Intelligence for Human-Assistant Planetary Surface Robots

The central premise in developing effective human-assistant planetary surface robots is that robotic intelligence is needed. The exact type, method, forms and/or quantity of intelligence is an open issue being explored on the ERA project, as well as others. In addition to field testing, theoretical research into this area can help provide answers on how to design future planetary robots. Many fundamental intelligence issues are discussed by Murphy [2], including (a) learning, (b) planning, (c) reasoning, (d) problem solving, (e) knowledge representation, and (f) computer vision (stereo tracking, gestures). The new "social interaction/emotional" form of intelligence that some consider critical to Human Robot Interaction (HRI) can also be addressed by human assistant planetary surface robots, as human operators feel more comfortable working with a robot when the robot is verbally (or even physically) interacting with them. Arkin [3] and Murphy are both proponents of the hybrid deliberative-reasoning/reactive-execution architecture as the best general architecture for fully realizing robot potential, and the robots discussed herein implement a design continuously progressing toward this hybrid philosophy. The remainder of this chapter will describe the challenges associated with robotic assistance to astronauts, our general research approach, the intelligence incorporated into our robots, and the results and lessons learned from over six years of testing human-assistant mobile robots in field settings relevant to planetary exploration. The chapter concludes with some key considerations for future work in this area.

[1]  Graham Mann,et al.  Jarntimarra-1: Selecting an Australian Mars analogue research site , 2002 .

[2]  Maarten Sierhuis,et al.  Advantages of Brahms for Specifying and Implementing a Multiagent Human-Robotic Exploration System , 2003, FLAIRS.

[3]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[4]  David Kortenkamp,et al.  A Survey of Space Robotics , 2003 .

[5]  Maarten Sierhuis,et al.  Brahms: simulating practice for work systems design , 1998, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  David Kortenkamp,et al.  Helping Humans: Agents for Distributed Space Operations , 2003 .

[7]  Francis Slakey,et al.  Robots vs. Humans: Who Should Explore Space? , 2008 .

[8]  Maarten Sierhuis,et al.  Automating CapCom Using Mobile Agents and Robotic Assistants , 2005 .

[9]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Seven principles of efficient human robot interaction , 2003, SMC'03 Conference Proceedings. 2003 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Conference Theme - System Security and Assurance (Cat. No.03CH37483).

[10]  Jeffrey Graham,et al.  Providing robotic assistance during extra-vehicular activity , 2002, SPIE Optics East.

[11]  David P. Miller,et al.  Experiences with an architecture for intelligent, reactive agents , 1995, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[12]  Paul R. Cohen,et al.  Handbook of AI , 1986 .

[13]  Fredrik Rehnmark,et al.  Robonaut: the 'short list' of technology hurdles , 2005, Computer.

[14]  Ronald C. Arkin,et al.  An Behavior-based Robotics , 1998 .

[15]  Lucy Suchman.  Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[16]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[17]  Milind Tambe,et al.  An Automated Teamwork Infrastructure for Heterogeneous Software Agents and Humans , 2003, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[18]  David Kortenkamp,et al.  User Interaction with Multi-Robot Systems , 2002 .

[19]  Robert O. Ambrose,et al.  Mobile manipulation using NASA's Robonaut , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[20]  Shawn R. Wolfe,et al.  SemanticOrganizer: A Customizable Semantic Repository for Distributed NASA Project Teams , 2004, International Semantic Web Conference.

[21]  William J. Clancey,et al.  Principles for Integrating Mars Analog Science, Operations, and Technology Research , 2003 .

[22]  Les Gasser,et al.  Social Conceptions of Knowledge and Action: DAI Foundations and Open Systems Semantics , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[23]  Stephen Braham,et al.  Communication system architecture for planetary exploration , 2001, 2001 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8542).

[24]  Maarten Sierhuis,et al.  Applying multiagent simulation to planetary surface operations , 2000 .

[25]  A. Acquisti,et al.  Multiagent Plan Execution and Work Practice: Modeling Plans and Practices Onboard the ISS , 2021 .

[26]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Common metrics for human-robot interaction , 2006, HRI '06.

[27]  William J. Clancey,et al.  Simulating activities: Relating motives, deliberation, and attentive coordination , 2002, Cognitive Systems Research.

[28]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Theory and evaluation of human robot interactions , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[29]  Maarten Sierhuis,et al.  Modeling and simulating work practice : BRAHMS: a multiagent modeling and simulation language for work system analysis and design , 2001 .

[30]  P. Pandurang Nayak,et al.  Remote Agent: To Boldly Go Where No AI System Has Gone Before , 1998, Artif. Intell..

[31]  Robert K. Vincent,et al.  A space-based end-to-end prototype geographic information network for lunar and planetary exploration and emergency response (2002 and 2003 field experiments) , 2005, Comput. Networks.