An integrated rough number-based approach to design concept evaluation under subjective environments

This study aims at improving the quality and effectiveness of concept evaluation in the early phases of new product development. New product concept evaluation has long been recognised as one of the most crucial decisions for the success of product development, because it has significant impact on the downstream development activities. However, evaluating new product concept is a process involving subjectivity and vagueness. In order to manipulate this problem, a novel decision approach for selecting more rational new product concepts is proposed. Basically, two stages of evaluation process are described: the computation of evaluation criteria weights for new product alternatives and the selection of the most appropriate concept. These stages are composed of a hybrid approach based on a rough group analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method and a rough group technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method. The novel approach integrates the strength of rough number in handling vagueness, the advantage of AHP in hierarchy evaluation and the merit of TOPSIS in modelling multi-criteria decision-making. Finally, an application in mini-fridge concept evaluation is given to demonstrate the potential of the methodology.

[1]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[2]  Kwangsun Yoon,et al.  The Propagation of Errors in Multiple-attribute Decision Analysis: A Practical Approach , 1989 .

[3]  Deborah L Thurston,et al.  Multiattribute utility analysis in design management , 1990 .

[4]  Deborah L Thurston,et al.  Fuzzy Ratings and Utility Analysis in Preliminary Design Evaluation of Multiple Attributes , 1992 .

[5]  Eric R. Marsh Hierarchical Decision Making in Machine Design , 1993 .

[6]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[7]  Pratyush Sen,et al.  Multiple Attribute Design Evaluation of Complex Engineering Products Using the Evidential Reasoning Approach , 1997 .

[8]  A. Johne,et al.  New service development: a review of the literature and annotated bibliography , 1998 .

[9]  Desire L. Massart,et al.  Rough sets theory , 1999 .

[10]  A. M. King,et al.  Development of a Methodology for Concept Selection in Flexible Design Strategies , 1999 .

[11]  S. Tor,et al.  A Rough-Set-Based Approach for Classification and Rule Induction , 1999 .

[12]  Graham Green Towards integrated design evaluation: Validation of models , 2000 .

[13]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[14]  Ching-Hung Lee,et al.  Fine Tuning Of Membership Functions For Fuzzy Neural Systems , 2008 .

[15]  Juite Wang,et al.  Ranking engineering design concepts using a fuzzy outranking preference model , 2001, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[16]  Susan Carlson Skalak House of Quality , 2002 .

[17]  Michael J. Scott,et al.  Quantifying Certainty in Design Decisions: Examining AHP , 2002 .

[18]  J Wang,et al.  A design—decision support framework for evaluation of design options/proposals using a composite structure methodology based on the approximate reasoning approach and the evidential reasoning method , 2003 .

[19]  Zeki Ayağ,et al.  A fuzzy AHP-based simulation approach to concept evaluation in a NPD environment , 2005 .

[20]  Bimal Nepal,et al.  Integrated fuzzy logic-based model for product modularization during concept development phase , 2005 .

[21]  Zeki Ayağ,et al.  An integrated approach to evaluating conceptual design alternatives in a new product development environment , 2005 .

[22]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Collaborative multidisciplinary decision making using game theory and design capability indices , 2005 .

[23]  Jian S. Dai,et al.  Product Cost Estimation: Technique Classification and Methodology Review , 2006 .

[24]  Wei Chen,et al.  An integrated computational intelligence approach to product concept generation and evaluation , 2006 .

[25]  Chi-Chun Lo,et al.  A fuzzy group-preferences analysis method for new-product development , 2006, Expert Syst. Appl..

[26]  Zhongsheng Hua,et al.  A note on group decision-making based on concepts of ideal and anti-ideal points in a fuzzy environment , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..

[27]  Z. Ayağ,et al.  An analytic network process-based approach to concept evaluation in a new product development environment , 2007 .

[28]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Group decision-making based on concepts of ideal and anti-ideal points in a fuzzy environment , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..

[29]  S. Q. Xie,et al.  Product Development Cost Estimation in Mass Customization , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[30]  D. Akay,et al.  Evaluation of product design concepts using grey-fuzzy information axiom , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Grey Systems and Intelligent Services.

[31]  Michael J. Scott Quantifying uncertainty in multicriteria concept selection methods , 2007 .

[32]  Sameer Kumar,et al.  Phase reviews versus fast product development: a business case , 2007 .

[33]  Li Pheng Khoo,et al.  A rough set enhanced fuzzy approach to quality function deployment , 2008 .

[34]  A. J. Dentsoras,et al.  Soft computing in engineering design - A review , 2008, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[35]  A. Braga,et al.  The influence of time-to-market and target costing in the new product development success , 2008 .

[36]  Li Pheng Khoo,et al.  Design concept evaluation in product development using rough sets and grey relation analysis , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[37]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  An Evidential-Reasoning-Interval-Based Method for New Product Design Assessment , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[38]  Zaifang Zhang,et al.  A new integrated decision-making approach for design alternative selection for supporting complex product development , 2009, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[39]  Chin-Tsai Lin,et al.  Using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to evaluate service performance of a travel intermediary , 2009 .

[40]  Li Pheng Khoo,et al.  A rough set based QFD approach to the management of imprecise design information in product development , 2009, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[41]  Rifat Gürcan Özdemir,et al.  A hybrid approach to concept selection through fuzzy analytic network process , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[42]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  Modeling subjective evaluation for fuzzy group multicriteria decision making , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[43]  Li Pheng Khoo,et al.  Towards a QFD-based expert system: A novel extension to fuzzy QFD methodology using rough set theory , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[44]  Reza Zanjirani Farahani,et al.  Fuzzy AHP to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria and Fuzzy TOPSIS to rank the alternatives , 2010, Appl. Soft Comput..

[45]  Diyar Akay,et al.  Conceptual design evaluation using interval type-2 fuzzy information axiom , 2011, Comput. Ind..