Stop Sign Gap Assist Application in a Connected Vehicle Simulation Environment

Assessment of the safety and mobility impacts of connected vehicles (CVs) and cooperative automated vehicle applications is critical to the success of these applications. In many cases, there may be trade-offs in the mobility and safety impacts depending on the setting of the parameters of the applications. This study developed a method to evaluate the safety and mobility benefits of the Stop Sign Gap Assist (SSGA) system, a CV-based application at unsignalized intersections, which utilizes a calibrated microscopic simulation tool. The study results confirmed that it was critical to calibrate the drivers’ gap acceptance probability distributions in the utilized simulation model to reflect real-world driver behaviors when assessing SSGA impacts. The simulation models with the calibrated gap parameters were then used to assess the impacts of the SSGA. The results showed that SSGA can potentially improve overall minor approach capacity at unsignalized intersections by approximately 35.5% when SSGA utilization reaches 100%. However, this increase in capacity depended on the setting of the minimum gap time in the SSGA and there was a clear trade-off between capacity and safety. The analysis indicated that as the minimum gap time used in the SSGA increased, the safety of the intersection increased, showing for example that with the utilization of an 8-s gap at a 750 vph main street flow rate, the number of conflicts could decrease by 30% as the SSGA utilization rate increased from 0% to 100%.

[1]  Lily Elefteriadou,et al.  The Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition: A Guide for Multimodal Mobility Analysis , 2016 .

[2]  Charles Anum Adams,et al.  Volume warrants for major and minor roads left-turning traffic lanes at unsignalized T-intersections: A case study using VISSIM modelling , 2018, Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition).

[3]  Erika Schroeder,et al.  National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) notes. Drugged driving expert panel report: a consensus protocol for assessing the potential of drugs to impair driving. , 2012, Annals of emergency medicine.

[4]  John N. Ivan,et al.  Gap acceptance for left turns from the major road at unsignalized intersections , 2014 .

[5]  Use of Communication Technologies to Enhance Public Involvement in Transportation Projects , 2018 .

[6]  Chris Tampère,et al.  Dynamic Modeling of VISSIM's Critical Gap Parameter at Unsignalized Intersections , 2013 .

[7]  Denny Stephens,et al.  Accelerated vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) safety applications : concept of operations document. , 2012 .

[8]  Rahul Joshi,et al.  Surrogate Safety Assessment Model (SSAM): Software User Manual , 2008 .

[9]  Denny Stephens,et al.  Vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) safety applications : performance requirements, vol. 7, stop sign gap assist (SSGA). , 2015 .

[10]  M. Guerrieri,et al.  Unsignalized Intersections , 2020, Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering.

[11]  M. Hadi,et al.  Estimation of System Performance and Technology Impacts to Support Future Year Planning , 2019 .

[12]  Hao Yu,et al.  Development of a VISSIM Simulation Model for U-Turns at Unsignalized Intersections , 2012 .

[13]  Eazaz Sadeghvaziri,et al.  A data-driven approach to calibrate microsimulation models based on the degree of saturation at signalized intersections , 2020 .

[14]  Kimihiko Nakano,et al.  Influences of Waiting Time on Driver Behaviors While Implementing In-Vehicle Traffic Light for Priority-Controlled Unsignalized Intersections , 2017 .

[15]  Sunanda Dissanayake,et al.  Driver age differences in day and night gap acceptance capabilities , 2002 .