Volatility in prediction markets: A measure of information flow in political campaigns

This article discusses the use of Bayesian analysis in the evaluation of temporal volatility and information flows in political campaigns. Using the 2004 US presidential election campaign as a case study, it demonstrates the utility of a model with two volatility regimes that simplifies the task of associating events with periods of high information. The article first explains why prediction markets are able to aggregate information such that the prices of future contracts are reflective of the event’s actual probability of occurring before analysing data from futures on ‘Bush wins the popular vote in 2004’, or the traded probability, of Bush winning the election. These data are used to build a measure of information flow. The results show that information flows increased as a result of the televised debates, and that these debates, along with the selection of the vice presidential candidate, increased prediction market volatility.

[1]  Thomas A. Rietz,et al.  Longshots, Overconfidence and Efficiency on the Iowa Electronic Market , 2017, International Journal of Forecasting.

[2]  Robin Hanson,et al.  Shall We Vote on Values, But Bet on Beliefs? , 2013 .

[3]  Helio S. Migon,et al.  Bayesian modeling of financial returns: A relationship between volatility and trading volume , 2010 .

[4]  Robert S. Erikson,et al.  Are Political Markets Really Superior to Polls as Election Predictors , 2008 .

[5]  Chris Den Hartog,et al.  The Value of Majority Status: The Effect of Jeffords's Switch on Asset Prices of Republican and Democratic Firms , 2008 .

[6]  Carlos M. Carvalho,et al.  Factor stochastic volatility with time varying loadings and Markov switching regimes , 2007 .

[7]  Carlos M. Carvalho,et al.  Simulation-based sequential analysis of Markov switching stochastic volatility models , 2007, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[8]  Douglas M. McLeod,et al.  Applying a Cognitive-Processing Model to Presidential Debate Effects: Postdebate News Analysis and Primed Reflection , 2007 .

[9]  William T. Bernhard,et al.  Democratic Processes and Financial Markets: Frontmatter , 2006 .

[10]  Paul C. Tetlock,et al.  Information Markets: A New Way of Making Decisions , 2006 .

[11]  Kenneth Oliven,et al.  Suckers Are Born but Markets Are Made: Individual Rationality, Arbitrage, and Market Efficiency on an Electronic Futures Market , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[12]  Koleman Strumpf,et al.  Historical presidential betting markets , 2004 .

[13]  William L. Benoit,et al.  A meta-analysis of the effects of viewing U.S. presidential debates , 2003 .

[14]  D. Hillygus,et al.  Voter Decision Making in Election 2000: Campaign Effects, Partisan Activation, and the Clinton Legacy , 2003 .

[15]  Thomas A. Rietz,et al.  Accuracy and Forecast Standard Error of Prediction Markets , 2003 .

[16]  John Brehm,et al.  History, heterogeneity, and presidential approval: a modified ARCH approach , 2002 .

[17]  Chris Kirby,et al.  Stochastic Volatility, Trading Volume, and the Daily Flow of Information , 2004 .

[18]  Gregory W. Brown,et al.  Market reaction to public information: The atypical case of the Boston Celtics , 2001 .

[19]  W. S. Chan,et al.  Stock Price Reaction to News and No-News: Drift and Reversal after Headlines , 2001 .

[20]  Nicholas G. Polson,et al.  The Impact of Jumps in Volatility and Returns , 2000 .

[21]  Toshiaki Watanabe Bayesian Analysis of Dynamic Bivariate Mixture Models: Can They Explain the Behavior of Returns and Trading Volume? , 2000 .

[22]  Cherie D. Maestas,et al.  Modeling volatility in political time series , 2000 .

[23]  Chang‐Jin Kim,et al.  State-Space Models with Regime-Switching: Classical and Gibbs Sampling Approaches with Applications , 1999 .

[24]  Thomas A. Rietz,et al.  Wishes, expectations and actions: a survey on price formation in election stock markets , 1999 .

[25]  Robert Forsythe,et al.  Markets as Predictors of Election Outcomes: Campaign Events and Judgement Bias in the 1993 UBC Election Stock Market , 1998 .

[26]  Mike K. P. So,et al.  A Stochastic Volatility Model With Markov Switching , 1998 .

[27]  Raymond D. Sauer,et al.  The Economics of Wagering Markets , 1998 .

[28]  Thomas M. Holbrook Do Campaigns Matter , 1996 .

[29]  T. Andersen Return Volatility and Trading Volume: An Information Flow Interpretation of Stochastic Volatility , 1996 .

[30]  N. Shephard,et al.  The simulation smoother for time series models , 1995 .

[31]  Thomas M. Holbrook The Behavioral Consequences of Vice-Presidential Debates , 1994 .

[32]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Bayesian Analysis of Stochastic Volatility Models , 1994 .

[33]  Joseph A. Schlesinger Political Parties and the Winning of Office , 1994 .

[34]  Gary King,et al.  Why Are American Presidential Election Campaign Polls So Variable When Votes Are So Predictable? , 1993, British Journal of Political Science.

[35]  James E. Campbell,et al.  The Convention Bump , 1992 .

[36]  D. J. Lanoue,et al.  ONE THAT MADE A DIFFERENCE: COGNITIVE CONSISTENCY, POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, AND THE 1980 PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE , 1992 .

[37]  Nicholas G. Polson,et al.  A Monte Carlo Approach to Nonnormal and Nonlinear State-Space Modeling , 1992 .

[38]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Stock Prices and Volume , 1992 .

[39]  Robert Forsythe,et al.  Anatomy of an Experimental Political Stock Market , 1992 .

[40]  Dennis F. Kinsey,et al.  The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns , 1993 .

[41]  Christopher G. Lamoureux,et al.  Persistence in Variance, Structural Change, and the GARCH Model , 1990 .

[42]  B. Grofman,et al.  The race may be close but my horse is going to win: Wish fulfillment in the 1980 presidential election , 1986 .

[43]  R. Jennings,et al.  Information Content and the Speed of Stock Price Adjustment , 1985 .

[44]  J. Patell,et al.  The intraday speed of adjustment of stock prices to earnings and dividend announcements , 1984 .

[45]  Edward Brent,et al.  When prophecy bends: The preference–expectation link in U.S. presidential elections, 1952–1980. , 1983 .

[46]  Sanford J. Grossman On the Impossibility of Informationally Efficient Markets , 1980 .

[47]  A. Miller,et al.  Learning About the Candidates: The 1976 Presidential Debates , 1979 .