Improving COVID-19 Research of University Hospitals in Germany: Formative Usability Evaluation of the CODEX Feasibility Portal

Background  Within the German “Network University Medicine,” a portal is to be developed to enable researchers to query on novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) data from university hospitals for assessing the feasibility of a clinical study. Objectives  The usability of a prototype for federated feasibility queries was evaluated to identify design strengths and weaknesses and derive improvement recommendations for further development. Methods  In the course of a remote usability test with the thinking-aloud method and posttask interviews, 15 clinical researchers evaluated the usability of a prototype of the Feasibility Portal. The identified usability problems were rated according to severity, and improvement recommendations were derived. Results  The design of the prototype was rated as simple, intuitive, and as usable with little effort. The usability test reported a total of 26 problems, 8 of these were rated as “critical.” Usability problems and revision recommendations focus primarily on improving the visual distinguishability of selected inclusion and exclusion criteria, enabling a flexible approach to criteria linking, and enhancing the free-text search. Conclusion  Improvement proposals were developed for these user problems which will guide further development and the adaptation of the portal to user needs. This is an important prerequisite for correct and efficient use in everyday clinical work in the future. Results can provide developers of similar systems with a good starting point for interface conceptualizations. The methodological approach/the developed test guideline can serve as a template for similar evaluations.

[1]  H-U Prokosch,et al.  Usability and Suitability of the Omics-Integrating Analysis Platform tranSMART for Translational Research and Education. , 2017, Applied clinical informatics.

[2]  Thomas Brox Røst,et al.  Testing an individualized digital decision assist system for the diagnosis and management of mental and behavior disorders in children and adolescents , 2020, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[3]  Reed McEwan,et al.  Usability Evaluation of an Unstructured Clinical Document Query Tool for Researchers , 2018, AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science.

[4]  C. von Kalle,et al.  The German Corona Consensus Dataset (GECCO): a standardized dataset for COVID-19 research in university medicine and beyond , 2020, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[5]  Jan Stage,et al.  What happened to remote usability testing?: an empirical study of three methods , 2007, CHI.

[6]  G. M. Wilson,et al.  Health Intelligence Atlas: A Core Tool for Public Health Intelligence , 2021, Applied Clinical Informatics.

[7]  C. Helfferich Die Qualität qualitativer Daten : Manual für die Durchführung qualitativer Interviews , 2011 .

[8]  Monique W. M. Jaspers,et al.  The think aloud method: a guide to user interface design , 2004, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[9]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Heuristic Evaluation of Prototypes (individual) , 2022 .

[10]  Danny T. Y. Wu,et al.  U.S. COVID-19 State Government Public Dashboards: An Expert Review , 2021, Applied Clinical Informatics.

[11]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .

[12]  A. Kocaballi,et al.  An Electronic Clinical Decision Support System for the Management of Low Back Pain in Community Pharmacy: Development and Mixed Methods Feasibility Study , 2020, JMIR medical informatics.

[13]  K. Khunti,et al.  Characteristics of patients in platform C19, a COVID-19 research database combining primary care electronic health record and patient reported information , 2021, PloS one.

[14]  Emil Kuric,et al.  Knowledge Graph Exploration: A Usability Evaluation of Query Builders for Laypeople , 2019, SEMANTiCS.

[15]  Ides Wong,et al.  Moving Faster than the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Rapid, Digital Transformation of a Public Health System , 2021, Appl. Clin. Inform..

[16]  Iñaki Soto-Rey,et al.  User Satisfaction Evaluation of the EHR4CR Query Builder: A Multisite Patient Count Cohort System , 2015, BioMed research international.

[17]  Thomas S. Tullis,et al.  An Empirical Comparison of Lab and Remote Usability Testing of Web Sites , 2002 .

[18]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Estimating the number of subjects needed for a thinking aloud test , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[19]  K Ann McKibbon,et al.  Engaging With a Wiki Related to Knowledge Translation: A Survey of WhatisKT Wiki Users , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[20]  Evaluation of Three Feasibility Tools for Identifying Patient Data and Biospecimen Availability: Comparative Usability Study , 2021, JMIR medical informatics.

[21]  C. Helfferich Interviewplanung und Intervieworganisation , 2004 .

[22]  Amanda S. Newton,et al.  Usability, learnability and performance evaluation of Intelligent Research and Intervention Software: A delivery platform for eHealth interventions , 2016, Health Informatics J..