MSATSI: A MATLAB Package for Stress Inversion Combining Solid Classic Methodology, a New Simplified User‐Handling, and a Visualization Tool

Online Material: Figures of complete stress inversion results. The estimation of the stress‐field orientation from focal mechanisms of earthquakes is a relevant tool to understand crustal mechanics and the physics of earthquakes. In global seismology, Formal Stress Inversion (FSI) is a well‐established technique to study tectonic processes associated with the occurrence of large earthquakes (e.g., Hardebeck and Michael, 2004; Yoshida et al. , 2012). Information on the stress‐field orientation is also relevant for the exploitation of hydrocarbon and geothermal reservoirs. Knowledge of the orientation of the maximum horizontal stress ( σ Hmax) is crucial for reservoir development, such as drilling and leakage risk assessment (Terakawa et al. , 2012; Martinez‐Garzon et al. , 2013). Additionally, the FSI technique may be useful for understanding the physics of rupture processes at a microscale in the frame of rock deformation experiments in the laboratory. In seismological practice, the stress tensor is obtained either from inverting earthquake focal mechanisms or directly from first‐motion polarities. Most of the developed FSI methods share two main assumptions: Estimation of stress‐field orientation is a nonlinear inverse problem that can be solved either directly or linearized. When solving the nonlinear inverse problem, the best‐fitting stress tensor to the group of focal mechanisms is obtained using grid‐search algorithms (Gephart and Forsyth, 1984; Gephart, 1990; Arnold and Townend, 2007) or Monte Carlo sampling‐based optimization methods (Angelier, 1984; Xu, 2004). The linearized inversion scheme is solved by a generally less computationally extensive least‐squares technique (Michael, 1984; Hardebeck and Michael, 2006). Because of …

[1]  W. Menke Geophysical data analysis : discrete inverse theory , 1984 .

[2]  Paul G. Richards,et al.  Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods , 1980 .

[3]  G. Dresen,et al.  Stress Tensor Changes Related to Fluid Injection at The Geysers Geothermal Field, California , 2013 .

[4]  Nicholas Deichmann,et al.  High fluid pressure and triggered earthquakes in the enhanced geothermal system in Basel, Switzerland , 2011 .

[5]  E. Hauksson,et al.  Stress Orientations Obtained from Earthquake Focal Mechanisms: What Are Appropriate Uncertainty Estimates? , 2001 .

[6]  J. Angelier,et al.  Tectonic analysis of fault slip data sets , 1984 .

[7]  H. Houston,et al.  Stress orientations in northern and central California: Evidence for the evolution of frictional strength along the San Andreas plate boundary system , 2003 .

[8]  M. Zoback,et al.  Regional tectonic stress near the San Andreas fault in central and southern California , 2004 .

[9]  Richard Arnold,et al.  A Bayesian approach to estimating tectonic stress from seismological data , 2007 .

[10]  Andreas Barth,et al.  Global crustal stress pattern based on the World Stress Map database release 2008 , 2010 .

[11]  Peiliang Xu,et al.  Determination of regional stress tensors from fault‐slip data , 2004 .

[12]  Gonca Örgülü Seismicity and source parameters for small-scale earthquakes along the splays of the North Anatolian Fault (NAF) in the Marmara Sea , 2011 .

[13]  A. Michael,et al.  Stress orientations at intermediate angles to the San Andreas Fault, California , 2004 .

[14]  D. McKenzie The relation between fault plane solutions for earthquakes and the directions of the principal stresses , 1969 .

[15]  Robert E. Wallace,et al.  Geometry of Shearing Stress and Relation to Faulting , 1951, The Journal of Geology.

[16]  Georg Dresen,et al.  Strain partitioning and stress rotation at the North Anatolian fault zone from aftershock focal mechanisms of the 1999 Izmit Mw= 7.4 earthquake , 2006 .

[17]  Andrew J. Michael,et al.  Determination of stress from slip data: Faults and folds , 1984 .

[18]  M. Zoback First‐ and second‐order patterns of stress in the lithosphere: The World Stress Map Project , 1992 .

[19]  Andrew J. Michael,et al.  Use of focal mechanisms to determine stress: A control study , 1987 .

[20]  G. Dresen,et al.  Stress rotation and recovery in conjunction with the 1999 Izmit Mw 7.4 earthquake , 2014 .

[21]  G. Dresen,et al.  Characterization of aftershock‐fault plane orientations of the 1999 İzmit (Turkey) earthquake using high‐resolution aftershock locations , 2007 .

[22]  Björn Lund,et al.  Calculating horizontal stress orientations with full or partial knowledge of the tectonic stress tensor , 2007 .

[23]  R. L. Holland,et al.  Lagrangian least-squares prediction of solar flux (F10.7) , 1984 .

[24]  John W. Gephart,et al.  Stress and the direction of slip on fault planes , 1990 .

[25]  M. Bott,et al.  The Mechanics of Oblique Slip Faulting , 1959, Geological Magazine.

[26]  John W. Gephart,et al.  An improved method for determining the regional stress tensor using earthquake focal mechanism data: Application to the San Fernando Earthquake Sequence , 1984 .

[27]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy , 1986 .

[28]  Akira Hasegawa,et al.  Stress before and after the 2011 great Tohoku‐oki earthquake and induced earthquakes in inland areas of eastern Japan , 2012 .

[29]  O. T. Jones,et al.  The Dynamics of Faulting and Dyke Formation: with Applications to Britain , 1942, Nature.

[30]  A. Michael,et al.  Damped regional‐scale stress inversions: Methodology and examples for southern California and the Coalinga aftershock sequence , 2006 .

[31]  J. D. Huba,et al.  Preliminary study of the CRRES magnetospheric barium releases , 1992 .

[32]  G. Dresen,et al.  Seismotectonic setting of the Karadere-Düzce branch of the North Anatolian Fault Zone between the 1999 Izmit and Düzce ruptures from analysis of Izmit aftershock focal mechanisms , 2010 .