Performance Evaluation of a Mobile Touchscreen Interface for Assistive Robotic Manipulators: A Pilot Study.

Background: Assistive robotic manipulators (ARMs) have been developed to provide enhanced assistance and independence in performance of daily activities among people with spinal cord injury when a caregiver is not on site. However, the current commercial ARM user interfaces (UIs) may be difficult to learn and control. A touchscreen mobile UI was developed to overcome these challenges. Objective: The object of this study was to evaluate the performance between 2 ARM UIs, touchscreen and the original joystick, using an ARM evaluation tool (ARMET). Methods: This is a pilot study of people with upper extremity impairments (N = 8). Participants were trained on 2 UIs, and then they chose one to use when performing 3 tasks on the ARMET: flipping a toggle switch, pushing down a door handle, and turning a knob. Task completion time, mean velocity, and open interviews were the main outcome measurements. Results: Among 8 novice participants, 7 chose the touchscreen UI and 1 chose the joystick UI. All participants could complete the ARMET tasks independently. Use of the touchscreen UI resulted in enhanced ARMET performance (higher mean moving speed and faster task completion). Conclusions: Mobile ARM UIs demonstrated easier learning experience, less physical effort, and better ARMET performance. The improved performance, the accessibility, and lower physical effort suggested that the touchscreen UI might be an efficient tool for the ARM users.

[1]  Michael R. M. Jenkin,et al.  Evaluating haptic feedback in virtual environments using ISO 9241–9 , 2010, 2010 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference (VR).

[2]  Ninja P. Oess,et al.  Design and evaluation of a low-cost instrumented glove for hand function assessment , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[3]  Francois Routhier,et al.  Evaluation of the JACO robotic arm: Clinico-economic study for powered wheelchair users with upper-extremity disabilities , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[4]  Natsuki Yamanobe,et al.  Evaluation of single switch interface with robot arm to help disabled people daily life , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[5]  R. Cooper,et al.  Functional assessment and performance evaluation for assistive robotic manipulators: Literature review , 2013, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[6]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Lending a helping hand: toward novel assistive robotic arms , 2013, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[7]  J. Bach,et al.  Wheelchair-Mounted Robot Manipulators: Long Term Use by Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy , 1990, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[8]  H.J.A. Stuyt,et al.  Cost-savings and economic benefits due to the assistive robotic manipulator (ARM) , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[9]  Shari Trewin,et al.  Physical accessibility of touchscreen smartphones , 2013, ASSETS.

[10]  James G Wright,et al.  Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  Rory A. Cooper,et al.  Personal Mobility and Manipulation Appliance—Design, Development, and Initial Testing , 2012, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[12]  C. Leroux,et al.  Evaluation of a graphic interface to control a robotic grasping arm: a multicenter study. , 2009, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.