Meta‐analysis: a review.

An empirical evaluation of meta-analytic procedures, defining results of individual studies, effect size and statistical significance, a framework for meta-analytic procedures, comparing and combiniting studies, the file drawer problem, the evaluation of effect sizes, the issue of study quality, a summarizing example

[1]  Enrico T. Federighi,et al.  Extended Tables of the Percentage Points of Student's t-Distribution , 1959 .

[2]  Ralph L. Rosnow,et al.  Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis , 1984 .

[3]  Quinn McNemar,et al.  At random: Sense and nonsense. , 1960 .

[4]  Edward H. Haertel,et al.  Research Integration: The State of the Art. , 1980 .

[5]  Robert Rosenthal,et al.  How are we doing in soft psychology , 1990 .

[6]  Robert Rosenthal,et al.  Further Evidence for the Cliff Effect in the Interpretation of Levels of Significance , 1964 .

[7]  D. Koshland.  The confusion profusion. , 1989, Science.

[8]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  A Note on Percent Variance Explained as A Measure of the Importance of Effects , 1979 .

[9]  M. Kendall.  Statistical Methods for Research Workers , 1937, Nature.

[10]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Statistical versus traditional procedures for summarizing research findings. , 1980, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  Brian Mullen,et al.  Basic Meta-Analysis: Procedures and Programs , 1985 .

[12]  R. Rosenthal.  Meta-analytic procedures for social research , 1984 .

[13]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice by H. M. Collins (review) , 1988, Technology and Culture.

[14]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Meta-Analytic Procedures for Combining Studies With Multiple Effect Sizes , 1986 .

[15]  Donald W. Fiske,et al.  The several kinds of generalization , 1978, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[16]  M. Braga,et al.  Exploratory Data Analysis , 2018, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. 2nd Ed..

[17]  Larry V. Hedges,et al.  How hard is hard science, how soft is soft science? The empirical cumulativeness of research. , 1987 .

[18]  R. Smart.  The importance of negative results in psychological research. , 1964 .

[19]  R. Pool.  Will New Evidence Support Cold Fusion?: Nearly 7 months after "cold fusion" was announced, some controlled studies of the phenomenon are nearing completion. , 1989, Science.

[20]  Gwenn W. Gröndal,et al.  Meta-analytic procedures for social research , 1993 .

[21]  Robert Rosenthal,et al.  The Interpretation of Levels of Significance by Psychological Researchers , 1963 .

[22]  David B. Pillemer,et al.  Summing Up: The Science of Reviewing Research. , 1986 .

[23]  D. Rubin,et al.  Further issues in summarizing 345 studies of interpersonal expectancy effects , 1980, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[24]  M. Zuckerman.  Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception , 1981 .

[25]  L. Hedges.  Estimation of effect size from a series of independent experiments. , 1982 .

[26]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Comment: Assumptions and Procedures in the File Drawer Problem , 1988 .

[27]  H. Friedman.  Magnitude of experimental effect and a table for its rapid estimation. , 1968 .

[28]  K. Wachter,et al.  Disturbed by meta-analysis? , 1988, Science.

[29]  L. Hedges.  Distribution Theory for Glass's Estimator of Effect size and Related Estimators , 1981 .

[30]  Judith A. Hall.  Nonverbal sex differences , 1984 .

[31]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Interpersonal expectancy effects: the first 345 studies , 1978, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[32]  Robert Rosenthal,et al.  Judgment Studies: Design, Analysis, and Meta-Analysis , 1987 .

[33]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Further meta-analytic procedures for assessing cognitive gender differences. , 1982 .

[34]  M. L. Smith,et al.  Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. , 1977, The American psychologist.

[35]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  A Simple, General Purpose Display of Magnitude of Experimental Effect , 1982 .

[36]  D. Rubin,et al.  Comparing Effect Sizes of Independent Studies , 1982 .

[37]  R. Light,et al.  Accumulating Evidence: Procedures for Resolving Contradictions among Different Research Studies. , 1971 .

[38]  R. Pool.  Similar experiments, dissimilar results. , 1988, Science.

[39]  David B. Pillemer,et al.  Summing Up: The Science of Reviewing Research , 1984 .

[40]  Gene V. Glass,et al.  The benefits of psychotherapy , 1980 .

[41]  Robert Rosenthal,et al.  Interpretation of significance levels and effect sizes by psychological researchers. , 1986 .

[42]  M. Strube.  Combining and comparing significance levels from nonindependent hypothesis tests. , 1985 .

[43]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Mediation of interpersonal expectancy effects: 31 meta-analyses. , 1985 .

[44]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[45]  A. Eagly,et al.  Sex of researchers and sex-typed communications as determinants of sex differences in influenceability: A meta-analysis of social influence studies , 1981 .

[46]  D M Barnes,et al.  Promising results halt trial of anti-AIDS drug. , 1986, Science.

[47]  Harris Cooper.  On the significance of effects and the effects of significance. , 1981 .

[48]  Harris Cooper,et al.  Integrating research: A guide for literature reviews, 2nd ed. , 1989 .

[49]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Paradoxical interventions: a meta-analysis. , 1987, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[50]  R. Rosenthal.  Combining results of independent studies. , 1978 .

[51]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Comparing Significance Levels of Independent Studies , 1979 .

[52]  Brian Mullen,et al.  Advanced BASIC meta-analysis , 1989 .

[53]  G. Glass,et al.  Meta-analysis in social research , 1981 .

[54]  D. Rubin,et al.  Statistical Analysis: Summarizing Evidence Versus Establishing Facts , 1985 .

[55]  R. Rosenthal.  Pygmalion Effects: Existence, Magnitude, and Social Importance , 1987 .

[56]  R. Rosenthal.  Quality-weighting of studies in meta-analytic research , 1991 .

[57]  R. Rosenthal.  The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results , 1979 .

[58]  G. Glass.  Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research1 , 1976 .

[59]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  The Volunteer Subject , 1965 .

[60]  R. Rosenthal.  Experimenter expectancy and the reassuring nature of the null hypothesis decision procedure , 1968 .

[61]  T. Sterling.  Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice Versa , 1959 .