Direct displacement‐based seismic assessment procedure for multi‐span reinforced concrete bridges with single‐column piers

In Italy, as in other high seismic risk countries, many bridges, nowadays deemed ‘strategic’ for civil protection interventions after an earthquake, were built without antiseismic criteria, and therefore their seismic assessment is mandatory. Accordingly, the development of a seismic assessment procedure that gives reliable results and, at the same time, is sufficiently simple to be applied on a large population of bridges in a short time is very useful. In this paper, a displacement-based procedure for the assessment of multi-span RC bridges, satisfying these requirements and called direct displacement-based assessment (DDBA), is proposed. Based on the direct displacement-based design previously developed by Priestley et al., DDBA idealizes the multi DOF bridge structure as an equivalent SDOF system and hence defines a safety factor in terms of displacement. DDBA was applied to hypothetical bridge configurations. The same structures were analyzed also using standard force-based approach. The reliability of the two methods was checked performing IDA with response spectrum compatible accelerograms. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Mervyn J. Kowalsky,et al.  A displacement‐based approach for the seismic design of continuous concrete bridges , 2002 .

[2]  Rui Pinho,et al.  An adaptive capacity spectrum method for assessment of bridges subjected to earthquake action , 2007 .

[3]  Mervyn J. Kowalsky,et al.  Implementation of Inelastic Displacement Patterns in Direct Displacement-Based Design of Continuous Bridge Structures , 2006 .

[4]  John F. Hall,et al.  Problems encountered from the use (or misuse) of Rayleigh damping , 2006 .

[5]  E. Faccioli,et al.  Displacement Spectra for Long Periods , 2004 .

[6]  Mahmoud Y. Al-Qaryouti,et al.  Local Site Effects Estimated from Ambient Vibration Measurements at Aqaba City, Jordan , 2007 .

[7]  M. Priestley DISPLACEMENT-BASED SEISMIC ASSESSMENT OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGS , 1997 .

[8]  J P Moehle,et al.  SHEAR STRENGTH AND DEFORMABILITY OF RC BRIDGE COLUMNS SUBJECTED TO INELASTIC CYCLIC DISPLACEMENTS , 1992 .

[9]  Mjn Priestley,et al.  Performance based seismic design , 2000 .

[10]  Mjn Priestley,et al.  VISCOUS DAMPING IN SEISMIC DESIGN AND ANALYSIS , 2005 .

[11]  Mervyn J. Kowalsky,et al.  Equivalent Damping in Support of Direct Displacement-Based Design , 2004 .

[12]  Mjn Priestley,et al.  Modelling inelastic response in direct displacement-based design , 2005 .

[13]  Tatjana Isaković,et al.  Applicability of pushover methods for the seismic analysis of single‐column bent viaducts , 2008 .

[14]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings , 2002 .

[15]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics , 1977 .

[16]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[17]  M. Fardis,et al.  Designer's guide to EN 1998-1 and en 1998-5 Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance; general rules, seismic actions, design rules for buildings, foundations and retaining structures/ M.Fardis[et al.] , 2005 .

[18]  Feng Wang,et al.  A PROBABILISTIC CAPACITY SPECTRUM STRATEGY FOR THE RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF BRIDGE PILE SHAFTS CONSIDERING SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION , 2011 .

[19]  Andreas J. Kappos,et al.  Further development of a multimodal pushover analysis procedure for seismic assessment of bridges , 2009 .

[20]  P Fajfar STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS IN EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING- A BREAKTHROUGH OF SIMPLIFIED NONLINEAR METHODS , 2002 .