Scientists' motivation to communicate science and technology to the public: surveying participants at the Madrid Science Fair

This paper investigates what motivates scientists to communicate science and technology in a science event involving a direct relationship and interaction with the public. A structured questionnaire survey was administered through face-to-face interviews to 167 research practitioners (researchers, technicians, support staff and fellows) at the Spanish Council for Scientific Research (CSIC) who participated in the Madrid Science Fair in the years 2001 to 2004. The motivations of members in each professional category are discussed. The most important motivations have to do with the desire to increase the public's interest in and enthusiasm for science, the public's scientific culture, and public awareness and appreciation of science and scientists. Senior researchers were also highly motivated by a sense of duty. Personal satisfaction and enjoyment were important motivations for younger scientists. This research will help to understand the mechanisms of scientists' motivation, and thus foster and encourage greater and better participation in events of this kind.

[1]  W. Bodmer,et al.  Research to improve public understanding programmes , 1992 .

[2]  Gillian Pearson,et al.  Scientists and the public understanding of science , 1997 .

[3]  J. Durant,et al.  The public understanding of science , 1989, Nature.

[4]  Lois W. Sayrs.  Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .

[5]  Rae Goodell,et al.  The visible scientists , 1975 .

[6]  Jon D. Miller.  The measurement of civic scientific literacy , 1998 .

[7]  Milagros Muñoz Martín.  Comunidad De Madrid , 2006 .

[8]  M. Ross.  Salience of reward and intrinsic motivation. , 1975 .

[9]  S. Lahiou,et al.  A guideline for survey-techniques in evaluation of research. EUR 14339 EN. Research evaluation , 1992 .

[10]  S. Kvale.  Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .

[11]  Steven Miller,et al.  Public understanding of science at the crossroads , 2001 .

[12]  Susan Stocklmayer,et al.  Science Communication: A Contemporary Definition , 2003 .

[13]  E. Deci.  INTRINSIC MOTIVATION, EXTRINSIC REINFORCEMENT, AND INEQUITY , 1972 .

[14]  Jean-Marc Lévy-Leblond,et al.  About misunderstandings about misunderstandings , 1992 .

[15]  E. Deci.  Effects of Externally Mediated Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation. , 1971 .

[16]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  The effects of extrinsic incentive on some qualitative aspects of task performance1 , 1971 .

[17]  G. Pearson.  The participation of scientists in public understanding of science activities: The policy and practice of the U.K. Research Councils , 2001 .

[18]  A. Gross.  The roles of rhetoric in the public understanding of science , 1994 .

[19]  Antonio Luque.  La ciencia y la tecnología en España , 1999 .

[20]  J. Gregory,et al.  Science in Public: Communication, Culture and Credibility , 2000 .

[21]  David C. McClelland,et al.  How Do Self-Attributed and Implicit Motives Differ?. , 1989 .

[22]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Incentives and Impediments to Scientists Communicating Through the Media , 1997 .

[23]  H. E. King.  The Achievement Motive , 1977 .

[24]  N. Allum,et al.  Science in Society: Re-Evaluating the Deficit Model of Public Attitudes , 2004 .

[25]  M. Michael.  Comprehension, Apprehension, Prehension: Heterogeneity and the Public Understanding of Science , 2002 .