A registration-based tracking algorithm based on noise separation

Abstract Object tracking by image registration is one of important issues in image processing and computer vision. The traditional registration-based tracking algorithms are based on the optical flow constant assumption, and therefore are very sensitive to some challenging factors (such as illumination variation, pose change, partial occlusion and so on). In order to handle these challenges, this paper proposes a robust registration-based tracking algorithm. This algorithm models the tracked object by using a principle component analysis (PCA) subspace, adopts the idea of noise separation to handle the abnormal noise that appears in the tracking process, and designs the corresponding objective function. This objective function can be effectively solved by an iteration algorithm, and then the representation coefficients and motion parameters are obtained at the same time. The experimental results on some challenging video dataset demonstrate that the proposed tracking algorithm could achieve promising performance.

[1]  Huchuan Lu,et al.  This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING 1 Online Object Tracking with Sparse Prototypes , 2022 .

[2]  Junseok Kwon,et al.  Visual tracking decomposition , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[3]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  An Iterative Image Registration Technique with an Application to Stereo Vision , 1981, IJCAI.

[4]  Shai Avidan,et al.  Support vector tracking , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[5]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Sparse Representation for Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[6]  Haibin Ling,et al.  Real time robust L1 tracker using accelerated proximal gradient approach , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[7]  Zdenek Kalal,et al.  Tracking-Learning-Detection , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[8]  Haibin Ling,et al.  Robust visual tracking using ℓ1 minimization , 2009, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[9]  Stefano Soatto,et al.  Occlusion Detection and Motion Estimation with Convex Optimization , 2010, NIPS.

[10]  Qilong Wang,et al.  Robust Registration-Based Tracking by Sparse Representation with Model Update , 2012, ACCV.

[11]  Yuan Li,et al.  Tracking in Low Frame Rate Video: A Cascade Particle Filter with Discriminative Observers of Different Lifespans , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[12]  Patrick Pérez,et al.  Color-Based Probabilistic Tracking , 2002, ECCV.

[13]  Horst Bischof,et al.  Semi-supervised On-Line Boosting for Robust Tracking , 2008, ECCV.

[14]  Shai Avidan Ensemble Tracking , 2007, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[15]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  Kernel-Based Object Tracking , 2003, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[16]  Tobias Bjerregaard,et al.  A survey of research and practices of Network-on-chip , 2006, CSUR.

[17]  Ming-Hsuan Yang,et al.  Robust Object Tracking with Online Multiple Instance Learning , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[18]  Ming-Hsuan Yang,et al.  Incremental Learning for Robust Visual Tracking , 2008, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[19]  Huchuan Lu,et al.  Superpixel tracking , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision.

[20]  Ling Shao,et al.  Recent advances and trends in visual tracking: A review , 2011, Neurocomputing.

[21]  Simon Baker,et al.  Lucas-Kanade 20 Years On: A Unifying Framework , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.