A Multimodal Biometric System Based on an Active Database Paradigm

Today, on many occasions and in many different places, one must be authorised in order to use certain services or applications or to access protected data. A user (person) can be authorised in three different ways or combinations of ways: it is either information that the user knows, something that the user possesses or a measurement of some physical or psychological characteristics unique to that user, i.e. biometric characteristics. In this paper we emphasize this third possibility. When talking about biometrics we can distinguish two basic types of systems: unimodal and multimodal. The main difference is that the unimodal biometric system is based solely on a single biometric feature, while multimodal biometric systems combine several features. We intend to show how active databases could be used in order to implement a multimodal (unimodal) biometric system and reduce the time needed for authorisation (identification or verification). Specifically, the concept of reactivity upon which active databases rely could be the core of a multimodal biometric system, as will be shown in the paper. We will especially consider the use of complex events used in active databases for authorisation purposes. Key words: ADBMS, active database, complex events, biometrics, biometric system

[1]  Roberto Brunelli,et al.  Person identification using multiple cues , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[2]  Ioannis P. Vlahavas,et al.  DEVICE: Compiling production rules into event-driven rules using complex events , 1997, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[3]  Peter C. Lockemann,et al.  Distributed Events in Active Database Systems: Letting the Genie out of the Bottle , 1998, Data Knowl. Eng..

[4]  Norman W. Paton,et al.  Active Rules in Database Systems , 1998, Monographs in Computer Science.

[5]  Fabio Casati,et al.  An Environment for Designing Exceptions in Workflows , 1999, Inf. Syst..

[6]  Jörgen Hansson,et al.  Active, Real-Time, and Temporal Database Systems: Second International Workshop, ARTDB'97, Como, Italy, September 8-9, 1997, Proceedings , 1999 .

[7]  Angela Goh,et al.  Composite event support in an active database , 1999 .

[8]  Robert Frischholz,et al.  BioID: A Multimodal Biometric Identification System , 2000, Computer.

[9]  C. J. Date What Not How: The Business Rules Approach to Application Development , 2000 .

[10]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Decision-Level Fusion in Fingerprint Verification , 2001, Multiple Classifier Systems.

[11]  Fernando L. Podio,et al.  Biometric Authentication Technology: From the Movies to Your Desktop , 2001 .

[12]  Michael Schrefl,et al.  Active data warehouses: complementing OLAP with analysis rules , 2001, Data Knowl. Eng..

[13]  Danilo Montesi,et al.  Analysis and optimization of active databases , 2002, Data Knowl. Eng..

[14]  Joselito Medina Marín,et al.  A Structural Model of ECA Rules in Active Database , 2002, MICAI.

[15]  Alexandra Poulovassilis,et al.  Analysis and optimisation of event-condition-action rules on XML , 2002, Comput. Networks.

[16]  Klaus R. Dittrich,et al.  SAMOS in hindsight: experiences in building an active object-oriented DBMS , 2003, Inf. Syst..

[17]  Sharath Pankanti,et al.  Biometric Recognition: Security and Privacy Concerns , 2003, IEEE Secur. Priv..

[18]  Mirko Maleković,et al.  Implementing business rules in active databases , 2004 .

[19]  K. Rabuzin,et al.  E-learning: Biometrics as a Security Factor , 2006, 2006 International Multi-Conference on Computing in the Global Information Technology - (ICCGI'06).