Integrated physics and math course for engineering students: A first experience

This paper presents the curricular design of an integrated course of Physics and Mathematics for first-year engineering students at a large private university in northern Mexico. The innovation includes the redesign course content, teaching strategies, classroom environment, technology, and evaluation. Richard Feynman stated “The rules that describe nature seem to be mathematical”. This curricular design uses mathematical laws to study physical phenomena so students can make strong predictions. This combination of mathematical and physical content uses mathematics as a powerful tool that offers the concepts and operations needed to analyze and understand physical models. The main pedagogical approach is modeling by instruction, in which students are actively engage in the processes of conjecturing, testing and thinking revision. The classroom setting consists of round tables that accommodate nine students arranged in groups of three. This setting fosters group interaction, promotes communication, empowers students, and in turn facilitates the development of learning skills such as argumentation and self-regulation. The variety of technological tools and equipment available in the classroom facilitate students’ investigation of various models that were constructed based on their own observations and measurements. This is an ongoing project. This paper compares the grades of freshmen who took the integrated physics-math course and those who enrolled in separate math and physics courses. It will also present the authors’ conclusions about engineering students’ learning and attitudes towards physics and math, and competencies fostered by the curricular design and classroom setting.

[1]  R. Beichner The Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment Undergraduate Programs (SCALE-UP) Project , 2007 .

[2]  R. Hake Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[3]  D. Hestenes Toward a modeling theory of physics instruction , 1987 .

[4]  David Hestenes,et al.  A modeling method for high school physics instruction , 1995 .

[5]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  How Does Technology-Enabled Active Learning Affect Undergraduate Students' Understanding of Electromagnetism Concepts? , 2005 .

[6]  David Hestenes,et al.  Modeling methodology for physics teachers , 2008 .

[7]  Peter S. Shaffer,et al.  Tutorials in Introductory Physics , 1998 .

[8]  Doug Szajda,et al.  Challenging Disciplinary Boundaries in the First Year: A New Introductory Integrated Science Course for STEM Majors , 2012 .

[9]  Jenna Carpenter Integrating Calculus And Introductory Science Concepts , 2007 .

[10]  Werner Blum,et al.  APPLICATIONS AND MODELLING , 2010 .

[11]  Eric Brewe Modeling theory applied: Modeling Instruction in introductory physics , 2008 .

[12]  Hisham Alnajjar,et al.  Integrating Science And Math Into The Freshman Engineering Design Course , 2002 .

[13]  Chet Meyers,et al.  Promoting Active Learning: Strategies for the College Classroom , 1993 .

[14]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  Integrated Curricula In The Succeed Coalition , 2003 .

[15]  Ramarathnam Narasimhan,et al.  Impact A Pilot Program Creating An Integrated Mathematics, Physics And Communication Track In The Engineering Curriculum , 1996 .

[16]  Ronald K. Thornton,et al.  Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula , 1998 .

[17]  Joaquín Martínez-Torregrosa,et al.  Mathematics in Physics Education: Scanning Historical Evolution of the Differential to Find a More Appropriate Model for Teaching Differential Calculus in Physics , 2006 .