SYSTEM CONSIDERATIONS AND CHALLENDES IN 3D MAPPING AND MODELING USING LOW-COST UAV SYSTEMS

In the last few years, low-cost UAV systems have been acknowledged as an affordable technology for geospatial data acquisition that can meet the needs of a variety of traditional and non-traditional mapping applications. In spite of its proven potential, UAV-based mapping is still lacking in terms of what is needed for it to become an acceptable mapping tool. In other words, a well-designed system architecture that considers payload restrictions as well as the specifications of the utilized direct geo-referencing component and the imaging systems in light of the required mapping accuracy and intended application is still required. Moreover, efficient data processing workflows, which are capable of delivering the mapping products with the specified quality while considering the synergistic characteristics of the sensors onboard, the wide range of potential users who might lack deep knowledge in mapping activities, and time constraints of emerging applications, are still needed to be adopted. Therefore, the introduced challenges by having low-cost imaging and georeferencing sensors onboard UAVs with limited payload capability, the necessity of efficient data processing techniques for delivering required products for intended applications, and the diversity of potential users with insufficient mapping-related expertise needs to be fully investigated and addressed by UAV-based mapping research efforts. This paper addresses these challenges and reviews system considerations, adaptive processing techniques, and quality assurance/quality control procedures for achievement of accurate mapping products from these systems.

[1]  J. Skaloud,et al.  Reliability of Direct Georeferencing-Beyond the Achilles ’ Heel of Modern Airborne Mapping , 2007 .

[2]  Ivan Detchev,et al.  Stability Analysis for a Multi-Camera Photogrammetric System , 2014, Sensors.

[3]  Changjae Kim,et al.  NEW APPROACH FOR PLANAR PATCH SEGMENTATION USING AIRBORNE LASER DATA , 2007 .

[4]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  Development of a UAV-LiDAR System with Application to Forest Inventory , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[5]  Mohannad Al-Durgham,et al.  A Framework for the Registration and Segmentation of Heterogeneous Lidar Data , 2013 .

[6]  F. Nex,et al.  UAV for 3D mapping applications: a review , 2014 .

[7]  Ana Paula Kersting,et al.  Mounting Parameters Calibration of GPS/INS-Assisted Photogrammetric Systems , 2011, 2011 International Workshop on Multi-Platform/Multi-Sensor Remote Sensing and Mapping.

[8]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  A Comparison and Evaluation of Multi-View Stereo Reconstruction Algorithms , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[9]  L. Pintoa,et al.  A SINGLE STEP CALIBRATION PROCEDURE FOR IMU / GPS IN AERIAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY , 2002 .

[10]  K. Kraus Photogrammetry: Geometry from Images and Laser Scans , 2007 .

[11]  D. Stallmann,et al.  SYSTEM CALIBRATION FOR DIRECT GEOREFERENCING , 2002 .

[12]  Anoop M. Pullivelli,et al.  Stability analysis of low‐cost digital cameras for aerial mapping using different georeferencing techniques , 2006 .

[13]  Heiko Hirschmüller,et al.  Stereo Processing by Semiglobal Matching and Mutual Information , 2008, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[14]  George Vosselman,et al.  Segmentation of point clouds using smoothness constraints , 2006 .

[15]  Ryosuke Shibasaki,et al.  UAV-Borne 3-D Mapping System by Multisensor Integration , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[16]  Kai-Wei Chiang,et al.  The Development of an UAV Borne Direct Georeferenced Photogrammetric Platform for Ground Control Point Free Applications , 2012, Sensors.

[17]  Guoqing Zhou,et al.  ADVANCES OF FLASH LIDAR DEVELOPMENT ONBOARD UAV , 2012 .

[18]  Yi Lin,et al.  Mini-UAV-Borne LIDAR for Fine-Scale Mapping , 2011, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[19]  Domenico Visintini,et al.  Reliable automatic classification and segmentation of laser point clouds by statistical analysis of surface curvature values , 2009 .

[20]  S. Gehrke,et al.  a Multi-Sensor Approach to Semi-Global Matching , 2012 .

[21]  Jan Skaloud,et al.  A micro-UAV with the capability of direct georeferencing , 2013 .

[22]  Ayman Habib,et al.  A novel quality control procedure for the evaluation of laser scanning data segmentation , 2014 .

[23]  Josef Jansa,et al.  THE GENERATION OF TRUE ORTHOPHOTOS USING A 3D BUILDING MODEL IN CONJUNCTION WITH A CONVENTIONAL DTM , 1998 .

[24]  Qing Zhu,et al.  Multiple close‐range image matching based on a self‐adaptive triangle constraint , 2010 .

[25]  Changjae Kim,et al.  New Methodologies for True Orthophoto Generation , 2007 .

[26]  Eunju Kwak,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Different Approaches for Multi-camera System Calibration , 2013 .

[27]  Ayman Habib,et al.  Stability Analysis and Geometric Calibration of Off-the-Shelf Digital Cameras , 2005 .

[28]  T. Rabbani,et al.  SEGMENTATION OF POINT CLOUDS USING SMOOTHNESS CONSTRAINT , 2006 .

[29]  Ayman Habib,et al.  Multi-camera System Calibration with Built-in Relative Orientation Constraints (Part 2) Automation, Implementation, and Experimental Results , 2014 .

[30]  C. Tao,et al.  Advances in Mobile Mapping Technology , 2009 .

[31]  Naser El-Sheimy,et al.  The development of VISAT: a mobile survey system for GIS applications , 1996 .

[32]  D. Lichti,et al.  An Object-space Simulation Method for Low-cost Digital Camera Stability Testing , 2009 .

[33]  Livio Pinto,et al.  A SINGLE STEP CALIBRATION PROCEDURE FOR IMU/GPS IN AERIAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY , 2002 .

[34]  N. El-Sheimy An Overview of Mobile Mapping Systems , 2005 .

[35]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  New Associate Editor pp iii-iv Segmentation of airborne laser scanning data using a slope adaptive neighborhood , 2006 .

[36]  Jean Ponce,et al.  Accurate, Dense, and Robust Multiview Stereopsis , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[37]  Dirk Rieke-Zapp,et al.  Evaluation of the geometric stability and the accuracy potential of digital cameras - Comparing mechanical stabilisation versus parameterisation , 2009 .

[38]  F. Neitzel,et al.  XXXVIII-1 / C 22 UAV-g 2011 , Conference on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle in Geomatics , Zurich , Switzerland MOBILE 3 D MAPPING WITH A LOW-COST UAV SYSTEM , 2011 .

[39]  Ayman Habib,et al.  An adaptive approach for the segmentation and extraction of planar and linear/cylindrical features from laser scanning data , 2014 .

[40]  Ayman Habib,et al.  A NEW APPROACH FOR SEGMENTATION-BASED TEXTURING OF LASER SCANNING DATA , 2015 .

[41]  J. Everaerts,et al.  THE USE OF UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES ( UAVS ) FOR REMOTE SENSING , 2008 .

[42]  A. Habib,et al.  Linear Approach for Initial Recovery of the Exterior Orientation Parameters of Randomly Captured Images by Low-Cost Mobile Mapping Systems , 2014 .

[43]  Henri Eisenbeiss The Potential of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Mapping , 2011 .

[44]  Horst A. Beyer,et al.  Calibration stability of the Kodak DCS420 and 460 cameras , 1997, Optics & Photonics.

[45]  Christian Heipke,et al.  EVALUATION OF AUTOMATIC ROAD EXTRACTION , 2007 .

[46]  J. S. Aber,et al.  Small-Format Aerial Photography: Principles, Techniques and Geoscience Applications , 2010 .

[47]  K. Bang,et al.  A novel single-step procedure for the calibration of the mounting parameters of a multi-camera terrestrial mobile mapping system , 2011 .