The Anatomy of a Hybrid In-Person and Virtual Sexual Health Clinic in Oncology

Sexual health is compromised by the diagnosis and treatment of virtually all cancer types. Despite the prevalence and negative impact of sexual dysfunction, sexual health clinics are the exception in cancer centers. Consequently, there is a need for effective, efficient, and inclusive sexual health programming in oncology. This paper describes the development of the innovative Sexual Health Clinic (SHC) utilizing a hybrid model of integrated in-person and virtual care. The SHC evolved from a fusion of the in-person and virtual prostate cancer clinics at Princess Margaret. This hybrid care model was adapted to include six additional cancer sites (cervical, ovarian, testicular, bladder, kidney, and head and neck). The SHC is theoretically founded in a biopsychosocial framework and emphasizes interdisciplinary intervention teams, participation by the partner, and a medical, psychological, and interpersonal approach. Virtual visits are tailored to patients based on biological sex, cancer type, and treatment type. Highly trained sexual health counselors facilitate the virtual clinic and provide an additional layer of personalization and a “human touch”. The in-person visits complement virtual care by providing comprehensive sexual health assessment and sexual medicine prescription. The SHC is an innovative care model which has the potential to close the gap in sexual healthcare. The SHC is designed as a transferable, stand-alone clinic which can be shared with cancer centers.

[1]  Canadian Cancer Statistics: A 2022 special report on cancer prevalence. , 2023, Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice.

[2]  B. Sirohi,et al.  Sexuality After Cancer as an Unmet Need: Addressing Disparities, Achieving Equality. , 2022, American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting.

[3]  N. Fleshner,et al.  An online Sexual Health and Rehabilitation eClinic (TrueNTH SHAReClinic) for prostate cancer patients: a feasibility study , 2021, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[4]  M. Mckenney,et al.  The financial strain placed on America's hospitals in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic , 2020, The American Journal of Emergency Medicine.

[5]  Muhammad S. Khan,et al.  Unmet needs in sexual health in bladder cancer patients: a systematic review of the evidence , 2020, BMC Urology.

[6]  Michael Lawrence Barnett,et al.  Covid-19 and the Upcoming Financial Crisis in Health Care , 2020, Nejm Catalyst Innovations in Care Delivery.

[7]  H. Putter,et al.  Discussing Sexual Health in the Medical Oncologist’s Practice: Exploring Current Practice and Challenges , 2019, Journal of Cancer Education.

[8]  C. Short,et al.  A systematic review of the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of online supportive care interventions targeting men with a history of prostate cancer , 2019, Journal of Cancer Survivorship.

[9]  J. Trachtenberg,et al.  The Prostate Cancer Rehabilitation Clinic: a biopsychosocial clinic for sexual dysfunction after radical prostatectomy. , 2018, Current oncology.

[10]  T. Leroy,et al.  Digital health interventions to help living with cancer: A systematic review of participants' engagement and psychosocial effects , 2018, Psycho-oncology.

[11]  H. Kang,et al.  Online-based interventions for sexual health among individuals with cancer: a systematic review , 2018, BMC Health Services Research.

[12]  J. Trachtenberg,et al.  320 Prostate Cancer Rehabilitation: Outcomes of a Sexual Health Clinic , 2018 .

[13]  L. Barbera,et al.  Interventions to address sexual problems in people with cancer. , 2017, Current oncology.

[14]  Lucy Yardley,et al.  Developing and Evaluating Digital Interventions to Promote Behavior Change in Health and Health Care: Recommendations Resulting From an International Workshop , 2017, Journal of medical Internet research.

[15]  Simon Hagens,et al.  Cumulative Benefits of Digital Health Investments in Canada , 2017, International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine.

[16]  P. Stone,et al.  What is the economic evidence for mHealth? A systematic review of economic evaluations of mHealth solutions , 2017, PloS one.

[17]  D. Wittmann Emotional and sexual health in cancer: partner and relationship issues , 2016, Current opinion in supportive and palliative care.

[18]  D. Dizon,et al.  Sexuality After Cancer: A Model for Male Survivors. , 2016, The journal of sexual medicine.

[19]  W. Kwan,et al.  Impact of Prostate Cancer Treatment on the Sexual Quality of Life for Men-Who-Have-Sex-with-Men. , 2015, The journal of sexual medicine.

[20]  R. M. Bakker,et al.  Cervical cancer survivors’ and partners’ experiences with sexual dysfunction and psychosexual support , 2015, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[21]  Ilias Goranitis,et al.  Health care financing and the sustainability of health systems , 2015, International Journal for Equity in Health.

[22]  N. Van As,et al.  Development of UK guidance on the management of erectile dysfunction resulting from radical radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer , 2014, International journal of clinical practice.

[23]  L. Schover,et al.  Sexual dysfunction and infertility as late effects of cancer treatment , 2014, EJC supplements : EJC : official journal of EORTC, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer ... [et al.].

[24]  C. Nelson,et al.  Sexual and reproductive health in cancer survivors. , 2013, Seminars in oncology.

[25]  R. Rosen,et al.  Standard operating procedures for taking a sexual history. , 2013, The journal of sexual medicine.

[26]  S. Kelders,et al.  Persuasive System Design Does Matter: A Systematic Review of Adherence to Web-Based Interventions , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[27]  V. Varela,et al.  Sexuality in adult cancer survivors: challenges and intervention. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  R. Muñoz,et al.  Internet interventions for improving psychological well‐being in psycho‐oncology: review and recommendations , 2012, Psycho-oncology.

[29]  A. Abernethy,et al.  Patient experiences with communication about sex during and after treatment for cancer , 2012, Psycho-oncology.

[30]  H. Gabra,et al.  A study of symptoms described by ovarian cancer survivors. , 2012, Gynecologic oncology.

[31]  J. R. Ruud Bosch,et al.  Pre-diagnosis quality of life (QoL) in patients with hematuria: comparison of bladder cancer with other causes , 2012, Quality of Life Research.

[32]  Young Ae Kim,et al.  Web-based tailored education program for disease-free cancer survivors with cancer-related fatigue: a randomized controlled trial. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  M. Ory,et al.  Outcomes of online support and resources for cancer survivors: a systematic literature review. , 2012, Patient education and counseling.

[34]  L. Del Pup Management of vaginal dryness and dyspareunia in estrogen sensitive cancer patients. , 2012, Gynecological Endocrinology.

[35]  S. Rogers,et al.  Issues of intimacy and sexual dysfunction following major head and neck cancer treatment. , 2009, Oral oncology.

[36]  B. Bokhour,et al.  Sexuality after treatment for early prostate cancer , 2001, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[37]  L. Jones,et al.  The impact of cancer on sexual function: a controlled study , 2003, Palliative Medicine.

[38]  Roy Romanow,et al.  Building on Values: Report of the Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada [Reports] , 2002 .