Assessment and Comparison of Machine Operators’ Working Posture in Forest Thinning

background and Purpose: Due to technological progress and improvement of working processes, significant changes in the field of health protection and safety at work have occurred in the forestry sector. Accordingly, this paper presents the assessment and comparison of the working posture for operators of three different types of forest machines: chainsaw, forwarder and harvester. Materials and Methods: The analysis was carried out from an ergonomic point of view using ErgoFellow 3.0 software, i.e. two ergonomic methods: Ovako Working Posture Analyzing System (OWAS) and Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA). Field measurements and data collection were carried out during the summer of 2017, when different wood harvesting technologies were applied within the same forest stand. The operators’ body posture was recorded during effective work by a video camera and was taken as a relevant comparison factor of different types of forest machines and three observed operators. From the video recordings, the working body postures were defined in accordance with the snapshot method with the aim of obtaining an equal number of observations for all three operators of forest machines. results and Conclusions: The results of the analysis of the working posture for operators of all three types of forest machines show that, in terms of the level and type of their impact on the worker, the work of the chainsaw operator is more demanding and much more risky than that of the harvester or forwarder operators. The comparison of the two risk categorization methods, from the aspect of the working posture, shows that the REBA method has higher risk ratings than the OWAS method for all three types of forest machines. The need to implement preventive measures established in Scandinavian countries and to define the guidelines for future research of the working postures of forest machine operators is presented in the discussion of this paper.

[1]  M Hagberg,et al.  Neck pain combined with arm pain among professional drivers of forest machines and the association with whole-body vibration exposure , 2009, Ergonomics.

[2]  Marie-Ève Chiasson,et al.  ÉVALUATION DES FACTEURS DE RISQUE DE TROUBLES MUSCULO-SQUELETTIQUES : COMPARAISON DE MÉTHODES D'OBSERVATION ET PERCEPTION DES TRAVAILLEURS , 2011 .

[3]  Jan Johansson Hanse,et al.  Work organisation constructs and ergonomic outcomes among European forest machine operators , 2008, Ergonomics.

[4]  Rodolfo Picchio,et al.  Skidding operations in thinning and shelterwood cut of mixed stands – Work productivity, energy inputs and emissions , 2013 .

[5]  L Punnett,et al.  PATH: a work sampling-based approach to ergonomic job analysis for construction and other non-repetitive work. , 1996, Applied ergonomics.

[6]  G. David Ergonomic methods for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. , 2005, Occupational medicine.

[7]  Kaj Bo Veiersted,et al.  Muscle Activity Patterns in the Neck and Upper Extremities Among Machine Operators in Different Forest Vehicles , 2008 .

[8]  Svend Erik Mathiassen,et al.  Systematic evaluation of observational methods assessing biomechanical exposures at work. , 2010, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[9]  Waldemar Karwowski,et al.  Occupational ergonomics : principles of work design , 2003 .

[10]  O Karhu,et al.  Correcting working postures in industry: A practical method for analysis. , 1977, Applied ergonomics.

[11]  L McAtamney,et al.  RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. , 1993, Applied ergonomics.

[12]  A J van der Beek,et al.  Working postures and activities of lorry drivers: a reliability study of on-site observation and recording on a pocket computer. , 1992, Applied ergonomics.

[13]  Bengt Pontén,et al.  New ergonomic problems in mechanized logging operations , 1990 .

[14]  W Karwowski,et al.  LUBA: an assessment technique for postural loading on the upper body based on joint motion discomfort and maximum holding time. , 2001, Applied ergonomics.

[15]  M. van der Schilden THE OWAS SYSTEM FOR ANALYSING WORKING POSTURES , 1989 .

[16]  Svend Erik Mathiassen,et al.  Increased physical work loads in modern work – a necessity for better health and performance? , 2009, Ergonomics.

[17]  Waldemar Karwowski,et al.  A Comparison of Three Observational Techniques for Assessing Postural Loads in Industry , 2007, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[18]  S Hignett,et al.  Rapid entire body assessment (REBA). , 2000, Applied ergonomics.