Development of a Pedestrian Demand Estimation Tool

Most research on walking behavior has focused on mode choice or walk-trip frequency. In contrast, this study is one of the first to analyze the destination choice behaviors of pedestrians. Using about 4,500 walk trips from a 2011 household travel survey in the Portland, Oregon, region, the authors estimated multinomial logit pedestrian destination choice models for six trip purposes. Independent variables included terms for impedance (walk-trip distance); size (employment by type, households); supportive pedestrian environments (parks, a pedestrian index of the environment variable called PIE); barriers to walking (terrain, industrial-type employment); and traveler characteristics. Unique to this study was the use of small-scale destination zone alternatives. Distance was a significant deterrent to pedestrian destination choice, and people in carless or childless households were less sensitive to distance for some purposes. Employment (especially retail) was a strong attractor: doubling the number of jobs nearly doubled the odds of choosing a destination for home-based shopping walk trips. More attractive pedestrian environments were also positively associated with pedestrian destination choice after controlling for other factors. These results shed light on determinants of pedestrian destination choice behavior, and sensitivities in the models highlight potential policy-levers to increase walking activity. In addition, the destination choice models can be used in regional travel demand models or as pedestrian planning tools to evaluate land use and transportation policy and investment scenarios.

[1]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Disaggregate Attraction-End Choice Modeling: Formulation and Empirical Analysis , 1998 .

[2]  David R. Ragland,et al.  Pilot Model for Estimating Pedestrian Intersection Crossing Volumes , 2009 .

[3]  Ronald W Eash,et al.  Destination and Mode Choice Models for Nonmotorized Travel , 1999 .

[4]  Washington State,et al.  Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages , 2012 .

[5]  Kelly J. Clifton,et al.  Improving the Representation of the Pedestrian Environment in Travel Demand Models, Phase I , 2013 .

[6]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  BIOGEME: a free package for the estimation of discrete choice models , 2003 .

[7]  Kelly J. Clifton,et al.  The Pedestrian Index of the Environment: Representing the Walking Environment in Planning Applications , 2014 .

[8]  Robert J. Schneider,et al.  Pedestrian and Bicycle Transportation Along Existing Roads—ActiveTrans Priority Tool Guidebook , 2015 .

[9]  Kelly J. Clifton,et al.  Pedestrians in Regional Travel Demand Forecasting Models: State of the Practice , 2013 .

[10]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Destination Choice Modeling for Home-Based Recreational Trips: Analysis and Implications for Land Use, Transportation, and Air Quality Planning , 2001 .

[11]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  STRATEGIC SAMPLING FOR LARGE CHOICE SETS IN ESTIMATION AND APPLICATION , 2012 .

[12]  Daniel A. Rodriguez,et al.  The relationship between non-motorized mode choice and the local physical environment , 2004 .

[13]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[14]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment , 2010 .

[15]  H. Timmermans,et al.  A Model of Pedestrian Route Choice and Demand for Retail Facilities within Inner-City Shopping Areas , 2010 .

[16]  Nagui M. Rouphail,et al.  Multimodal Level of Service Analysis for Urban Streets , 2008 .

[17]  Andrew Daly,et al.  Estimating choice models containing attraction variables , 1982 .

[18]  F. Pagliara,et al.  Choice set generation in spatial contexts: a review , 2009 .

[19]  David E. Boyce,et al.  Enhanced Destination Choice Models Incorporating Agglomeration Related to Trip Chaining While Controlling for Spatial Competition , 2009 .

[20]  Eric I. Pas,et al.  STATE OF THE ART AND RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES IN TRAVEL DEMAND: ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE , 1985 .

[21]  B. Saelens,et al.  Built environment correlates of walking: a review. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[22]  J. Sallis,et al.  Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures , 2003, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[23]  Hjp Harry Timmermans,et al.  A context-sensitive model of spatial choice behaviour , 1988 .

[24]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Numerical Analysis of Effect of Sampling of Alternatives in Discrete Choice Models , 2004 .

[25]  K. Kockelman,et al.  Models for Anticipating Non-motorized Travel Choices, and Role of the Built Environment , 2014 .

[26]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  A Self Instructing Course in Mode Choice Modeling: Multinomial and Nested Logit Models , 2006 .