Revealing indirect risks in complex socioeconomic systems: A highly detailed multi‐model analysis of flood events in Austria

Cascading risks that can spread through complex systems have recently gained attention. As it is crucial for decision-makers to put figures on such risks and their interactions, models that explicitly capture such interactions in a realistic manner are needed. Climate related hazards often cascade through different systems, from physical to economic and social systems, causing direct but also indirect risks and losses. Despite their growing importance in the light of ongoing climate change and increasing global connections, such indirect risks are not well understood. Applying two fundamentally different economic models-a computable general equilibrium model and an agent-based model-we reveal indirect risks of flood events. The models are fed with sector-specific capital stock damages, which constitutes a major methodological improvement. We apply these models for Austria, a highly flood exposed country with strong economic linkages. A key finding is that flood damages pose very different indirect risks to different sectors and household groups (distributional effects) in the short and long-term. Our results imply that risk management should focus on specific societal subgroups and sectors. We provide a simple metric for indirect risk, showing how direct and indirect losses are related. This can provide new ways forward in risk management, for example, focusing on interconnectedness of sectors and agents within different risk-layers of indirect risk. Although we offer highly relevant leverage points for indirect risk management in Austria, the methodology of analyzing indirect risks can be transferred to other regions.

[1]  I. Linkov,et al.  Modeling critical infrastructure resilience under compounding threats: A systematic literature review , 2022, Progress in Disaster Science.

[2]  S. Hochrainer-Stigler,et al.  Barriers and Ways Forward to Climate Risk Management Against Indirect Effects of Natural Disasters: A Case Study on Flood Risk in Austria , 2022, Climate Risk Management.

[3]  K. Adams,et al.  Adaptation to transboundary climate risks in trade: Investigating actors and strategies for an emerging challenge , 2022, WIREs Climate Change.

[4]  G. Bachner,et al.  Is carbon pricing regressive? Insights from a recursive-dynamic CGE analysis with heterogeneous households for Austria , 2021, Energy Economics.

[5]  T. Carter,et al.  A conceptual framework for cross-border impacts of climate change , 2021, Global Environmental Change.

[6]  S. Hochrainer-Stigler Changes in fiscal risk against natural disasters due to Covid-19 , 2021, Progress in Disaster Science.

[7]  M. Laubichler,et al.  Systemic Risks from Different Perspectives , 2020, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[8]  K. Steininger,et al.  Uncertainties in macroeconomic assessments of low-carbon transition pathways - The case of the European iron and steel industry , 2020 .

[9]  Sebastian Poledna,et al.  Economic Forecasting with an Agent-Based Model , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[10]  I. Linkov,et al.  Lack of resilience in transportation networks: Economic implications , 2019, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[11]  Gina L. Tonn,et al.  Simulating Behavioral Influences on Community Flood Risk under Future Climate Scenarios , 2019, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[12]  W. Botzen,et al.  The Economic Impacts of Natural Disasters: A Review of Models and Empirical Studies , 2019, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[13]  Aaron B Gertz,et al.  A CGE Framework for Modeling the Economics of Flooding and Recovery in a Major Urban Area , 2019, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[14]  Gina L. Tonn,et al.  An Agent‐Based Model of Evolving Community Flood Risk , 2018, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[15]  A. Rose,et al.  Dynamic Economic Resilience and Economic Recovery from Disasters: A Quantitative Assessment , 2018, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[16]  J. Handmer,et al.  Government liabilities for disaster risk in industrialized countries: a case study of Australia , 2018 .

[17]  A. Turrell,et al.  An Interdisciplinary Model for Macroeconomics , 2017 .

[18]  Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler,et al.  Structured Coupling of Probability Loss Distributions: Assessing Joint Flood Risk in Multiple River Basins , 2015, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[19]  Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler,et al.  Increasing stress on disaster-risk finance due to large floods , 2014 .

[20]  L. Bouwer,et al.  Managing unnatural disaster risk from climate extremes , 2014 .

[21]  J. Cuñado,et al.  The Macroeconomic Impacts of Natural Disasters: The Case of Floods , 2014, Land Economics.

[22]  H. Kunreuther,et al.  Catastrophe modeling : a new approach to managing risk , 2013 .

[23]  T. Fomby,et al.  THE GROWTH AFTERMATH OF NATURAL DISASTERS: THE GROWTH AFTERMATH OF NATURAL DISASTERS , 2013 .

[24]  L. Christiaensen,et al.  Natural Disasters and Growth - Going Beyond the Averages , 2009 .

[25]  Paul A. Raschky,et al.  Creative Disasters? Flooding Effects on Capital, Labour and Productivity Within European Firms , 2009 .

[26]  David Enke,et al.  Case Study: Applying a Regional Cge Model for Estimation of Indirect Economic Losses Due to Damaged Highway Bridges , 2007 .

[27]  S. Hallegatte,et al.  Why economic dynamics matter in assessing climate change damages : illustration on extreme events , 2007 .

[28]  Stéphane Hallegatte,et al.  An Adaptive Regional Input‐Output Model and its Application to the Assessment of the Economic Cost of Katrina , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[29]  K. D. Bruijn,et al.  Resilience indicators for flood risk management systems of lowland rivers , 2004 .

[30]  Paul A. Samuelson,et al.  Interactions Between The Multiplier Analysis And The Principle Of Acceleration , 1939 .