The relationship between phoneme discrimination, speech production, and language comprehension in cerebral-palsied individuals.

Twenty-four individuals with impaired speech (anarthria or dysarthria) were compared on tests of receptive language to a control group with normal speech. All subjects were cerebral-palsied and groups were matched on age and nonverbal ability. The speech-impaired subjects performed less well than controls on a phoneme discrimination task in which they were required to judge whether pairs of nonwords were the same or different. They were also impaired relative to controls on a receptive vocabulary test, but not in understanding of grammatical structure. One year later, phoneme discrimination skills were reassessed in this sample, using another same-different task, plus a new task in which subjects were required to judge if the name of a picture was spoken correctly or altered by one sound. Speech-impaired subjects performed as well as controls on the word judgment task, indicating that they can discriminate phoneme contrasts adequately. However, the same-different task again resulted in highly significant differences between speech-impaired and control groups. It is concluded that poor performance on the same-different task reflects weak memory for novel phonological strings, rather than impaired phoneme perception. It is proposed that retention of unfamiliar words is facilitated by overt or covert repetition, so individuals who cannot speak fluently have difficulty remembering nonwords. This explanation can account both for the poor performance of speech-impaired subjects on the same-different task, and for their selective deficit in vocabulary acquisition.

[1]  D. Bishop Spelling ability in congenital dysarthria: Evidence against articulatory coding in translating between phonemes and graphemes , 1985 .

[2]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[3]  A M Liberman,et al.  Perception of the speech code. , 1967, Psychological review.

[4]  L. A. Kurdek,et al.  Vocal and Gestural Imitation in 8-, 14-, and 20-Month-Old Children , 1977 .

[5]  C E Snow,et al.  The uses of imitation , 1981, Journal of Child Language.

[6]  A. Liberman,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revised , 1985, Cognition.

[7]  Mm. Liabre Standard Progressive Matrices , 1984 .

[8]  D. Bishop,et al.  Accurate non-word spelling despite congenital inability to speak: phoneme-grapheme conversion does not require subvocal articulation. , 1989, British journal of psychology.

[9]  D. Massaro Preperceptual images, processing time, and perceptual units in auditory perception. , 1972, Psychological review.

[10]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Evaluation of the role of phonological STM in the development of vocabulary in children: A longitudinal study , 1989 .

[11]  Dorothy V. M. Bishop,et al.  Unimpaired Short-term Memory and Rhyme Judgement in Congenitally Speechless Individuals: Implications for the Notion of “Articulatory Coding” , 1989 .

[12]  J. Locke,et al.  The inference of speech perception in the phonologically disordered child. Part II: Some clinically novel procedures. Their use, some findings. , 1980, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[13]  Virginia W. Berninger,et al.  Language profiles in nonspeaking individuals of normal intelligence with severe cerebral palsy , 1986 .

[14]  P. MacNeilage,et al.  Speech production and perception in a patient with severe impairment of somesthetic perception and motor control. , 1967, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[15]  Don McNicol,et al.  A Primer of Signal Detection Theory , 1976 .

[16]  G. A. Miller,et al.  An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants , 1955 .