Cardiovascular Screening Practices and Attitudes From the NCAA Autonomous “Power” 5 Conferences

Background: The development of athlete-specific electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation standards, along with recent rates of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in athletes being higher than previously estimated, has heightened the debate in the sports medicine community regarding cardiovascular screening of the college athlete, including whether certain high-risk subsets, such as male basketball athletes, should undergo more intensive screening. Hypothesis: ECG and/or echocardiography screening in National Collegiate Athletic Association Autonomous 5 Division I (A5DI) schools will be more common than previous reports, and there will be more frequent use of noninvasive cardiac screening for men’s basketball players than the general athlete population. Study Design: Cross-sectional, quantitative study. Level of Evidence: Level 4. Methods: The head team physician for each of the 65 schools in the A5DI conferences was contacted to complete an anonymous survey regarding cardiovascular screening practices at their institution. The survey inquired about current screening protocols, whether SCD epidemiology (SCD-E) was considered in establishing those practices, and whether awareness of present epidemiology altered physician attitudes toward screening. Results: A total of 45 of the 65 team physicians (69%) responded. All schools reported performing history and a physical evaluation. While 17 (38%) perform only history and physical, 26 (58%) also include an ECG, and 12 (27%) include echocardiography for all student-athletes. Specifically for male basketball athletes, 10 (22%) schools perform only history and physical, 32 (71%) include ECG, and 20 (45%) include echocardiography. Additionally, 64% reported using SCD-E in developing their screening protocol. Those that had not considered SCD-E indicated they were unlikely to change their screening protocol when presented with current SCD-E. Conclusion: The majority (62%) of A5DI institutions include ECG and/or echocardiography as part of their cardiovascular screening of all athletes, increasing to 78% when specifically analyzing male basketball athletes. Clinical Relevance: A5DI institutions, presumably with greater resources, have largely implemented more intensive cardiovascular screening than just history and physical for all student-athletes and specifically for men’s basketball—the athlete group at greatest risk.

[1]  H. Heidbuchel,et al.  International criteria for electrocardiographic interpretation in athletes: Consensus statement , 2017, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[2]  Wei Yang,et al.  Five-Year Experience with Screening Electrocardiograms in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Athletes , 2016, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[3]  J. Prutkin,et al.  Electrocardiographic Screening in National Collegiate Athletic Association Athletes. , 2016, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  W. Roberts,et al.  AMSSM Position Statement on Cardiovascular Preparticipation Screening in Athletes: Current evidence, knowledge gaps, recommendations and future directions , 2016, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[5]  P. Thompson,et al.  Interassociation Consensus Statement on Cardiovascular Care of College Student-Athletes. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  J. Prutkin,et al.  Cardiovascular screening in college athletes. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  Jonathan A Drezner,et al.  The effectiveness of screening history, physical exam, and ECG to detect potentially lethal cardiac disorders in athletes: a systematic review/meta-analysis. , 2015, Journal of electrocardiology.

[8]  C. Schmied Improvement of cardiac screening in amateur athletes. , 2015, Journal of electrocardiology.

[9]  V. Froelicher,et al.  Comparison of three ECG criteria for athlete pre-participation screening. , 2014, Journal of electrocardiology.

[10]  C. Asplund,et al.  Cardiovascular Preparticipation Screening Practices of College Team Physicians , 2014, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[11]  C. Elley,et al.  Standardised criteria improve accuracy of ECG interpretation in competitive athletes: a randomised controlled trial , 2014, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[12]  Michael F Dulin,et al.  Electrocardiography-inclusive screening strategies for detection of cardiovascular abnormalities in high school athletes. , 2014, Heart rhythm.

[13]  Mathew G. Wilson,et al.  Should axis deviation or atrial enlargement be categorised as abnormal in young athletes? The athlete's electrocardiogram: time for re-appraisal of markers of pathology. , 2013, European heart journal.

[14]  E. Behr,et al.  Clinical significance of electrocardiographic right ventricular hypertrophy in athletes: comparison with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and pulmonary hypertension. , 2013, European heart journal.

[15]  J. Kalman,et al.  The Seattle Criteria increase the specificity of preparticipation ECG screening among elite athletes , 2013, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[16]  Hein Heidbuchel,et al.  Electrocardiographic interpretation in athletes: the ‘Seattle Criteria’ , 2013, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[17]  G. Matheson,et al.  The International Olympic Committee (IOC) Consensus Statement on periodic health evaluation of elite athletes March 2009 , 2009, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[18]  B. Maron,et al.  Sudden Deaths in Young Competitive Athletes: Analysis of 1866 Deaths in the United States, 1980–2006 , 2009, Circulation.

[19]  Original Research Put Into Perspective for the Practicing Clinician Incidence, Cause, and Comparative Frequency of Sudden Cardiac Death in National Collegiate Athletic Association Athletes: A Decade in Review , 2015 .

[20]  E. Prescott Cardiovascular pre-participation screening of young competitive athletes for prevention of sudden death: proposal for a common European protocol. , 2006, European heart journal.