Detecting impossible changes in infancy: a three-system account

Can infants detect that an object has magically disappeared, broken apart or changed color while briefly hidden? Recent research suggests that infants detect some but not other 'impossible' changes; and that various contextual manipulations can induce infants to detect changes they would not otherwise detect. We present an account that includes three systems: a physical-reasoning, an object-tracking, and an object-representation system. What impossible changes infants detect depends on what object information is included in the physical-reasoning system; this information becomes subject to a principle of persistence, which states that objects can undergo no spontaneous or uncaused change. What contextual manipulations induce infants to detect impossible changes depends on complex interplays between the physical-reasoning system and the object-tracking and object-representation systems.

[1]  Z. Pylyshyn.  Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision , 2001, Cognition.

[2]  David H. Rakison,et al.  Building object categories in developmental time : 32nd Carnegie Mellon symposium on cognition , 2005 .

[3]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  Object Individuation in Infancy: The Use of Featural Information in Reasoning about Occlusion Events , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Indexing and the object concept: developing `what' and `where' systems , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  Should all stationary objects move when hit? Developments in infants' causal and statistical expectations about collision events. , 2003, Infant behavior & development.

[6]  S. Carey,et al.  On the limits of infants' quantification of small object arrays , 2005, Cognition.

[7]  R. Baillargeon.  Innate Ideas Revisited: For a Principle of Persistence in Infants' Physical Reasoning , 2008, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[8]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  Detecting continuity violations in infancy: a new account and new evidence from covering and tube events , 2005, Cognition.

[9]  T. Wilcox.  Object individuation: infants’ use of shape, size, pattern, and color , 1999, Cognition.

[10]  A. Needham.  The role of shape in 4-month-old infants’ object segregation , 1999 .

[11]  K. Jellinger.  Processes of Change in Brain and Cognitive Development Attention and Performance XXI , 2007 .

[12]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[13]  Richard N Aslin,et al.  Statistical learning of new visual feature combinations by infants , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Renée Baillargeon,et al.  Can infants be “taught” to attend to a new physical variable in an event category? The case of height in covering events , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  T. Wilcox,et al.  Priming infants to attend to color and pattern information in an individuation task , 2004, Cognition.

[16]  Nora S. Newcombe,et al.  Infants' coding of location in continuous space. , 1999 .

[17]  Susan J. Hespos,et al.  Infants' Knowledge About Occlusion and Containment Events: A Surprising Discrepancy , 2001, Psychological science.

[18]  S. Gelman,et al.  Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity In Cognition And Culture , 1994 .

[19]  Alan M. Leslie,et al.  A memory span of one? Object identification in 6.5-month-old infants , 2005, Cognition.

[20]  Daniel T. Levin,et al.  Nothing compares 2 views: Change blindness results from failures to compare retained information , 2004 .

[21]  L. Kohne,et al.  Visual experience enhances infants' use of task-relevant information in an action task. , 2007, Developmental psychology.

[22]  Renée Baillargeon,et al.  Inducing Infants to Detect a Physical Violation in a Single Trial , 2005, Psychological science.

[23]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  Perseverative responding in a violation-of-expectation task in 6.5-month-old infants , 2003, Cognition.

[24]  Sean Duffy,et al.  Infants and Toddlers Discriminate Amount: Are They Measuring? , 2002, Psychological science.

[25]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  An Account of Infants' Physical Reasoning , 2008 .

[26]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  Steven J Luck,et al.  Rapid Development of Feature Binding in Visual Short-Term Memory , 2006, Psychological science.

[28]  Bonnie L. Angelone,et al.  The Relationship between Change Detection and Recognition of Centrally Attended Objects in Motion Pictures , 2003, Perception.

[29]  Karen Wynn,et al.  Addition and subtraction by human infants , 1992, Nature.

[30]  Susan J. Hespos,et al.  Reasoning about containment events in very young infants , 2001, Cognition.

[31]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  Developments in young infants' reasoning about occluded objects , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[32]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  When the ordinary seems unexpected: evidence for incremental physical knowledge in young infants , 2005, Cognition.

[33]  A. Needham,et al.  Infants' formation and use of categories to segregate objects , 2005, Cognition.

[34]  B. Scholl,et al.  Explaining the infant''s object concept: Beyond the perception/cognition dichotomy , 1999 .

[35]  Stephen R Mitroff,et al.  Nothing compares 2 views: Change blindness can occur despite preserved access to the changed information , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  Infants' physical knowledge affects their change detection. , 2006, Developmental science.

[37]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Secret Agents , 2005, Psychological science.

[38]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  Young infants' reasoning about hidden objects: evidence from violation-of-expectation tasks with test trials only , 2004, Cognition.

[39]  Amy Needham,et al.  Infants’ use of category knowledge and object attributes when segregating objects at 8.5 months of age , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[40]  Renée Baillargeon,et al.  Event categorization in infancy , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  The “what” and “where” of object representations in infancy , 2003, Cognition.

[42]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  The relationship between online visual representation of a scene and long-term scene memory. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  Effects of balance relations between objects on infant’s object segregation , 2000 .

[44]  A. Leslie.  Mapping the mind: ToMM, ToBY, and Agency: Core architecture and domain specificity , 1994 .

[45]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  Object permanence in young infants: further evidence. , 1991, Child development.

[46]  E. Spelke.  Initial knowledge: six suggestions , 1994, Cognition.

[47]  Zsuzsa Kaldy,et al.  Identification of objects in 9‐month‐old infants: integrating ‘what’ and ‘where’ information , 2003 .

[48]  B. Scholl,et al.  Interrupting infants' persisting object representations: an object-based limit? , 2006, Developmental science.

[49]  B. Eckardt.  What Is Cognitive Science , 1992 .

[50]  E. Spelke,et al.  Infants' Discrimination of Number vs. Continuous Extent , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[51]  Susan J. Hespos,et al.  Décalage in infants' knowledge about occlusion and containment events: Converging evidence from action tasks , 2006, Cognition.

[52]  Renée Baillargeon,et al.  The development of calibration-based reasoning about collision events in young infants , 1998, Cognition.