In Silico Analysis of Bioethanol Overproduction by Genetically Modified Microorganisms in Coculture Fermentation

Lignocellulosic biomass is an attractive sustainable carbon source for fermentative production of bioethanol. In this context, use of microbial consortia consisting of substrate-selective microbes is advantageous as it eliminates the negative impacts of glucose catabolite repression. In this study, a detailed in silico analysis of bioethanol production from glucose-xylose mixtures of various compositions by coculture fermentation of xylose-selective Escherichia coli strain ZSC113 and glucose-selective wild-type Saccharomyces cerevisiae is presented. Dynamic flux balance models based on available genome-scale metabolic networks of the microorganisms have been used to analyze bioethanol production and the maximization of ethanol productivity is addressed by computing optimal aerobic-anaerobic switching times. A set of genetic engineering strategies for ethanol overproduction by E. coli strain ZSC113 have been evaluated for their efficiency in the context of batch coculture process. Finally, simulations are carried out to determine the pairs of genetically modified E. coli strain ZSC113 and S. cerevisiae that significantly enhance ethanol productivity in batch coculture fermentation.

[1]  D. Sarkar,et al.  In silico analysis of bioethanol production from glucose/xylose mixtures during fed-batch fermentation of co-culture and mono-culture systems , 2014, Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering.

[2]  K. Shanmugam,et al.  Genetic improvement of Escherichia coli for ethanol production: chromosomal integration of Zymomonas mobilis genes encoding pyruvate decarboxylase and alcohol dehydrogenase II , 1991, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[3]  D. Kompala,et al.  Cybernetic model of the growth dynamics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in batch and continuous cultures. , 1999, Journal of biotechnology.

[4]  T. W. Jeffries,et al.  Metabolic engineering for improved fermentation of pentoses by yeasts , 2004, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[5]  U. Stahl,et al.  Relevance of microbial coculture fermentations in biotechnology , 2010, Journal of applied microbiology.

[6]  H. Min,et al.  Improvement of ethanol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by hetero-expression of GAPN and FPS1 deletion. , 2011 .

[7]  D. Sarkar,et al.  Dynamic flux balance analysis of batch fermentation: effect of genetic manipulations on ethanol production , 2014, Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering.

[8]  Adam M. Feist,et al.  A genome-scale metabolic reconstruction for Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655 that accounts for 1260 ORFs and thermodynamic information , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[9]  Jennifer L. Reed,et al.  OptORF: Optimal metabolic and regulatory perturbations for metabolic engineering of microbial strains , 2010, BMC Systems Biology.

[10]  F. Doyle,et al.  Dynamic flux balance analysis of diauxic growth in Escherichia coli. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[11]  B. Dien,et al.  Fermentation of hexose and pentose sugars using a novel ethanologenic Escherichia coli strain. , 1998 .

[12]  J. Nielsen,et al.  Fuel ethanol production from lignocellulose: a challenge for metabolic engineering and process integration , 2001, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[13]  B. Palsson,et al.  Metabolic Flux Balancing: Basic Concepts, Scientific and Practical Use , 1994, Bio/Technology.

[14]  Sarah A. Lee,et al.  A co-fermentation strategy to consume sugar mixtures effectively , 2008, Journal of biological engineering.

[15]  Timothy J. Hanly,et al.  Dynamic flux balance modeling of S. cerevisiae and E. coli co-cultures for efficient consumption of glucose/xylose mixtures , 2011, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[16]  Markus J. Herrgård,et al.  Reconstruction and validation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae iND750, a fully compartmentalized genome-scale metabolic model. , 2004, Genome research.

[17]  T. W. Jeffries,et al.  Bacteria engineered for fuel ethanol production: current status , 2003, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[18]  Jens Nielsen,et al.  Metabolic engineering of yeast for production of fuels and chemicals. , 2013, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[19]  Ronan M. T. Fleming,et al.  Quantitative prediction of cellular metabolism with constraint-based models: the COBRA Toolbox v2.0 , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[20]  M. Cotta Ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass by recombinant Escherichia coli strain FBR5 , 2012, Bioengineered.

[21]  Tiangang Liu,et al.  Genetic engineering of Escherichia coli for biofuel production. , 2010, Annual review of genetics.

[22]  J. Förster,et al.  In silico aided metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for improved bioethanol production. , 2006, Metabolic engineering.

[23]  L. Min,et al.  Metabolic engineering of an ethanol-tolerant Escherichia coli MG1655 for enhanced ethanol production from xylose and glucose , 2010 .

[24]  Jeffrey D Orth,et al.  What is flux balance analysis? , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[25]  F. Srienc,et al.  Minimal Escherichia coli Cell for the Most Efficient Production of Ethanol from Hexoses and Pentoses , 2008, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[26]  Timothy J. Hanly,et al.  Dynamic metabolic modeling of a microaerobic yeast co-culture: predicting and optimizing ethanol production from glucose/xylose mixtures , 2013, Biotechnology for Biofuels.

[27]  Timothy J. Hanly,et al.  Dynamic flux balance modeling of microbial co‐cultures for efficient batch fermentation of glucose and xylose mixtures , 2011, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[28]  Ronan M. T. Fleming,et al.  Quantitative prediction of cellular metabolism with constraint-based models: the COBRA Toolbox v2.0 , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[29]  Evangelos Simeonidis,et al.  Flux balance analysis: a geometric perspective. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[30]  Probing the bioethanol production potential of Scheffersomyces (Pichia) stipitis using validated genome-scale model , 2014, Biotechnology Letters.

[31]  B. Dien,et al.  Conversion of corn fiber to ethanol by recombinant E. coli strain FBR3 , 1999, Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[32]  Yanli Chen Development and application of co-culture for ethanol production by co-fermentation of glucose and xylose: a systematic review , 2011, Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology.

[33]  L. Vane,et al.  Kinetics of growth and ethanol production on different carbon substrates using genetically engineered xylose-fermenting yeast. , 2007, Bioresource technology.