Flat spacetimes with compact hyperbolic Cauchy surfaces

We study the flat (n+1)-spacetimes Y admitting a Cauchy surface diffeomorphic to a compact hyperbolic n-manifold M . Roughly speaking, we show how to construct a canonical future complete one, Yρ, among all such spacetimes sharing a same holonomy ρ. We study the geometry of Yρ in terms of its canonical cosmological time (CT). In particular we study the asymptotic behaviour of the level surfaces of the cosmological time. The present work generalizes the case n = 2 treated in [11] taking from [4] the emphasis on the fundamental role played by the canonical cosmological time. In particular Mess showed that if F is a closed surface of genus g ≥ 2 then the linear holonomies of the Lorentzian flat structures on R × F such that {0} × F is a spacelike surface are faithful and discrete representations of π1(F ) in SO (2, 1). Moreover he proved that every representation φ : π1(F ) → Iso(M3) whose linear part is faithful and discrete is a holonomy for some Lorentzian structure on R×F such that {0}×F is a spacelike surface. In particular he showed that there exists a unique maximal future complete convex domain of M3, called domain of dependence, which is φ(π1(F ))-invariant such that the quotient is a globally hyperbolic manifold homeomorphic to R × F with regular cosmological time. If we fix the linear holonomy f : π1(F ) → SO(2, 1) these domains (and so the affine deformations of the representation f) are parametrized by the measured geodesic laminations on H/f(π1(F )). The link between domains of dependence and measured geodesic laminations is the Gauss map of the CT-level surfaces. On the other hand Benedetti and Guadagnini noticed in [4] the singularity in the past of a domain of dependence is a real tree which is dual to the lamination. Moreover they argued that the action of π1(F ) on the CT-level surface Sa = T −1(a) converges in the Gromov sense to the action of π1(F ) on the singularity for a → 0 and to the action of π1(F ) on the hyperbolic plane

[1]  Thierry Barbot Globally hyperbolic flat space-times , 2004, math/0402257.

[2]  L. Andersson Constant mean curvature foliations of flat space--times , 2001, math/0110245.

[3]  Kevin P. Scannell 3-manifolds which are spacelike slices of flat spacetimes , 2000, math/0011021.

[4]  Kevin P. Scannell Infinitesimal deformations of some SO(3,1) lattices , 2000 .

[5]  R. Benedetti,et al.  Cosmological time in (2+1)-gravity , 2000, gr-qc/0003055.

[6]  Kevin P. Scannell Flat conformal structures and the classification of de Sitter manifolds , 1999 .

[7]  R. Howard,et al.  THE COSMOLOGICAL TIME FUNCTION , 1997, gr-qc/9709084.

[8]  R. Benedetti,et al.  Lectures on Hyperbolic Geometry , 1992 .

[9]  Sadayoshi Kojima,et al.  Polyhedral Decomposition of Hyperbolic 3-Manifolds with Totally Geodesic Boundary , 1992 .

[10]  A. Zeghib Laminations et hypersurfaces géodésiques des variétés hyperboliques , 1991 .

[11]  R. Skora Splittings of surfaces , 1990 .

[12]  W. Lickorish AUTOMORPHISMS OF SURFACES AFTER NIELSEN AND THURSTON (London Mathematical Society Student Texts 9) , 1990 .

[13]  G. P. Scott ANALYTICAL AND GEOMETRIC ASPECTS OF HYPERBOLIC SPACE: (London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series 111) , 1989 .

[14]  Steven A. Bleiler,et al.  Automorphisms of Surfaces after Nielsen and Thurston , 1988 .

[15]  F. Paulin Topologie de Gromov équivariante, structures hyperboliques et arbres réels , 1988 .

[16]  B. Apanasov The geometry of Nielsen's Hull for a Kleinian group in space and quasi-conformal mappings , 1988 .

[17]  D. Epstein,et al.  Analytical and geometric aspects of hyperbolic space : Warwick and Durham 1984 , 1987 .

[18]  John K. Beem,et al.  Global Lorentzian Geometry , 1981 .

[19]  R. Geroch,et al.  The domain of dependence , 1970 .

[20]  A. Weil Remarks on the cohomology of groups , 2016 .