Emotional Responses to Energy Projects: Insights for Responsible Decision Making in a Sustainable Energy Transition

Energy projects aimed at a sustainable energy transition can trigger strong negative emotions and resistance from the public. While practitioners are increasingly realising that they cannot simply ignore public emotions, they struggle with how to deal with people’s emotional responses and how to secure public acceptability of sustainable energy projects. We argue that a first critical step in order to adequately address emotional responses to energy projects is to understand where these emotional responses come from. We introduce a value-based approach, which entails that different characteristics of energy projects may violate or support people’s core values, which evokes emotions in people. We present a theoretical framework of the relationship between people’s values, the (perceived) implications of energy projects for these values, and people’s emotional responses to energy projects. We give examples from case studies in the literature to substantiate our reasoning, and we offer directions for future research. Our novel approach provides critical insights for project developers, decision makers, engineers, and scientists who aim to better understand the human dimension of a sustainable energy transition.

[1]  Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al.  Effects of exemplar scenarios on public preferences for energy futures using the my2050 scenario-building tool , 2017, Nature Energy.

[2]  Linda Steg,et al.  Contextual and psychological factors shaping evaluations and acceptability of energy alternatives: Integrated review and research agenda , 2014 .

[3]  John A. Glaser,et al.  Environmental values , 2008 .

[4]  Ulf J. J. Hahnel,et al.  Intentions to adopt photovoltaic systems depend on homeowners' expected personal gains and behavior of peers , 2015 .

[5]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The affect heuristic , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  L. Steg,et al.  Going green? The relative importance of feelings over calculation in driving environmental intent in the Netherlands and the United States , 2016 .

[7]  Sabine Roeser,et al.  Aesthetics as a Risk Factor in Designing Architecture , 2013 .

[8]  K. Scherer,et al.  Appraisal Theories of Emotion: State of the Art and Future Development , 2013 .

[9]  Stephen M. Johnson,et al.  The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits , 2000 .

[10]  D. Sander,et al.  Handbook of value : perspectives from economics, neuroscience, philosophy, psychology and sociology , 2015 .

[11]  David Bidwell,et al.  The role of values in public beliefs and attitudes towards commercial wind energy , 2013 .

[12]  Mirosław Żelazny,et al.  The Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals , 2011 .

[13]  B. Wee,et al.  Hydrogen fuel station acceptance: A structural equation model based on the technology acceptance framework , 2014 .

[14]  P. Slovic Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[15]  Kate Burningham,et al.  An Array of Deficits: Unpacking NIMBY Discourses in Wind Energy Developers' Conceptualizations of Their Local Opponents , 2015 .

[16]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy case study , 2010 .

[17]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Examining the Relationship Between Affect and Implicit Associations: Implications for Risk Perception , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[18]  L. Steg,et al.  The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology , 2012 .

[19]  K. Shrader-Frechette Environmental Justice: Creating Equality, Reclaiming Democracy , 2002 .

[20]  S. Schwartz Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries , 1992 .

[21]  David J Ball,et al.  The Feeling of Risk: New Perspectives on Risk Perception , 2010 .

[22]  Stephen D. Schwarz The Right and the Good , 1992 .

[23]  P. Stern,et al.  Integrating social science in energy research , 2015 .

[24]  J. Stainer,et al.  The Emotions , 1922, Nature.

[25]  R. Lazarus Psychological stress and the coping process , 1970 .

[26]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Affective Imagery and Acceptance of Replacing Nuclear Power Plants , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[27]  Robert C. Roberts,et al.  Emotions : an essay in aid of moral psychology , 2003 .

[28]  Linda Steg,et al.  The influence of values on evaluations of energy alternatives , 2015 .

[29]  Sabine Roeser,et al.  Moral Emotions and Intuitions , 2010 .

[30]  G. Vries,et al.  How Positive Framing May Fuel Opposition to Low-Carbon Technologies: The Boomerang Model , 2017 .

[31]  Ernst H. Noppers,et al.  The adoption of sustainable innovations: Driven by symbolic and environmental motives , 2014 .

[32]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy , 2005 .

[33]  Linda Steg,et al.  Morality and Nuclear Energy: Perceptions of Risks and Benefits, Personal Norms, and Willingness to Take Action Related to Nuclear Energy , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[34]  M. Zimmer,et al.  Values and pragmatic action: The challenges of introducing ethical intelligence in technical design communities , 2009 .

[35]  Linda Steg,et al.  Expanding the role for psychology in addressing environmental challenges. , 2016, The American psychologist.

[36]  Eefje Cuppen,et al.  Responsible innovation as an endorsement of public values: the need for interdisciplinary research , 2014 .

[37]  P. Slovic,et al.  The Role of Affect and Worldviews as Orienting Dispositions in the Perception and Acceptance of Nuclear Power1 , 1996 .

[38]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Public acceptance of renewable energy technologies from an abstract versus concrete perspective and the positive imagery of solar power , 2017 .

[39]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Putting pylons into place: a UK case study of public perspectives on the impacts of high voltage overhead transmission lines , 2013 .

[40]  J. Rawls,et al.  A Theory of Justice , 1971, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[41]  Emma ter Mors,et al.  It's not only about safety: Beliefs and attitudes of 811 local residents regarding a CCS project in Barendrecht , 2012 .

[42]  L. Steg,et al.  Is gas perceived as sustainable? Insights from value-driven evaluations in the Netherlands , 2016 .

[43]  Neil Simcock,et al.  Spatializing energy justice , 2017 .

[44]  Linda Steg,et al.  Values, Perceived Risks and Benefits, and Acceptability of Nuclear Energy , 2013, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[45]  Jeroen van den Hoven,et al.  Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design , 2015 .

[46]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Diversity: Energy studies need social science , 2014, Nature.

[47]  Nicole M. A. Huijts,et al.  The emotional dimensions of energy projects: Anger, fear, joy and pride about the first hydrogen fuel station in the Netherlands , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[48]  Sabine Roeser,et al.  An Emotional Deliberation Approach to Risk , 2016 .

[49]  Claudia Basta Risk and Spatial Planning , 2012 .

[50]  Hanna Damasio,et al.  Impairment of social and moral behavior related to early damage in human prefrontal cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[51]  Heather Barnes Truelove,et al.  Energy source perceptions and policy support: Image associations, emotional evaluations, and cognitive beliefs , 2012 .

[52]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Planning of renewables schemes: Deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation , 2007 .

[53]  Eefje Cuppen,et al.  Energy justice and controversies: Formal and informal assessment in energy projects , 2017 .

[54]  Emma ter Mors,et al.  The potential of host community compensation in facility siting , 2012 .

[55]  Gordon Walker,et al.  Emotion and rationality: The characterisation and evaluation of opposition to renewable energy projects , 2009 .

[56]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  Regular ArticleProtected Values , 1997 .

[57]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Motivations and barriers associated with adopting microgeneration energy technologies in the UK , 2013 .

[58]  J. Haidt The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. , 2001, Psychological review.

[59]  Justine Lacey,et al.  How wind became a four-letter word: Lessons for community engagement from a wind energy conflict in King Island, Australia , 2016 .

[60]  L. Steg,et al.  The Significance of Hedonic Values for Environmentally Relevant Attitudes, Preferences, and Actions , 2014 .