Second primary cancers in patients with carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix. The norwegian experience 1970–1992

Multiple primary cancers in the same individual occur rarely. Consequently, a large number of cancer patients have to be followed for long periods to obtain adequate information about their risk of subsequent tumour development. Studies of multiple malignancies are of interest, since they may provide information on common or opposite risk factors. In the present study, the risk of second primary cancers following carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix diagnosed in Norway in the period 1970–1992 was examined and quantified. Altogether, 37,001 patients with carcinoma m situ were followed from the date of diagnosis until 31 December 1992. The follow‐up period was divided into 5‐year intervals. The results were expressed as standardized incidence ratios (SIR = O/E), and their 95% confidence intervals were given. A total of 1,037 second primary cancers in 989 individuals were identified. There was no overall excess of second primary cancers. However, there were differences depending on the site: cancers of the oesophagus, nose, nasal cavities, trachea, bronchus, lung, vulva, vagina, bladder and other urinary organs, and other skin cancers, excluding basal‐cell carcinoma, occurred more frequently. A lower risk than expected was noted for cancer of the cervix uteri and cancer of the corpus uteri. There was a rising trend with time in the observed/expected ratio for cancer of urinary organs. In the group of patients evaluated, the likelihood of subsequent tumour development was no greater than in the general female population. Nevertheless, cancer sites of higher and of lower risk than expected were identified among the carcinoma‐In situ patients. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss Inc.

[1]  T. Bjørge,et al.  Incidence, survival and mortality in cervical cancer in Norway, 1956-1990. , 1993, European journal of cancer.

[2]  J. Kaldor,et al.  The causal link between human papillomavirus and invasive cervical cancer: A population‐based case‐control study in colombia and spain , 1992, International journal of cancer.

[3]  K. Holmes,et al.  A cohort study of the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 in relation to papillomavirus infection , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  F. X. Bosch,et al.  Second international workshop on the epidemiology of cervical cancer and human papillomavirus , 1992 .

[5]  R. Biggar,et al.  Second primary cancers following anal and cervical carcinoma: evidence of shared etiologic factors. , 1992, American journal of epidemiology.

[6]  K. Sherman,et al.  Cigarette smoking and the risk of anogenital cancer. , 1992, American journal of epidemiology.

[7]  M. Melbye,et al.  Aetiological parallel between anal cancer and cervical cancer , 1991, The Lancet.

[8]  W. Winkelstein,et al.  Smoking and cervical cancer--current status: a review. , 1990, American journal of epidemiology.

[9]  F. Pettersson,et al.  Second Primary Cancer After Treatment of Invasive Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix, Compared with Those Arising After Treatment for in Sltu Carcinomas. ‐ An Eft of Irradiation?: A Cancer Registry Study , 1990, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[10]  P Fraser,et al.  Radiation dose and second cancer risk in patients treated for cancer of the cervix. , 1988, Radiation research.

[11]  N. Day,et al.  Second cancers following radiation treatment for cervical cancer. An international collaboration among cancer registries. , 1985, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[12]  M. Mushinski,et al.  Tobacco and alcohol consumption in relation to the development of multiple primary cancers , 1977 .