Helical axes of skeletal knee joint motion during running.

The purpose of this study was to determine the changes in the axis of rotation of the knee that occur during the stance phase of running. Using intracortical pins, the three-dimensional skeletal kinematics of three subjects were measured during the stance phase of five running trials. The stance phase was divided into equal motion increments for which the position and orientation of the finite helical axes (FHA) were calculated relative to a tibial reference frame. Results were consistent within and between subjects. At the beginning of stance, the FHA was located at the midepicondylar point and during the flexion phase moved 20mm posteriorly and 10mm distally. At the time of peak flexion, the FHA shifted rapidly by about 10-20mm in proximal and posterior direction. The angle between the FHA and the tibial transverse plane increased gradually during flexion, to about 15 degrees of medial inclination, and then returned to zero at the start of the extension phase. These changes in position and orientation of FHA in the knee should be considered in analyses of muscle function during human movement, which require moment arms to be defined relative to a functional rotation axis. The finding that substantial changes in axis of rotation occurred independent of flexion angle suggests that musculoskeletal models must have more than one kinematic degree-of-freedom at the knee. The same applies to the design of knee prostheses, if the goal is to restore normal muscle function.

[1]  Braden C Fleming,et al.  Measurement of anterior–posterior knee laxity: a comparison of three techniques , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[2]  J David Blaha,et al.  Kinematics of the Human Knee Using an Open Chain Cadaver Model , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  D. Dennis,et al.  In Vivo Fluoroscopic Analysis of the Normal Human Knee , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  A. J. van den Bogert,et al.  Effect of skin movement on the analysis of skeletal knee joint motion during running. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  D R Pedersen,et al.  A comparison of the accuracy of several hip center location prediction methods. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  B. Nigg,et al.  Tibiofemoral and tibiocalcaneal motion during walking: external vs. skeletal markers , 1997 .

[7]  F.E. Zajac,et al.  An interactive graphics-based model of the lower extremity to study orthopaedic surgical procedures , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  M P Kadaba,et al.  On the estimation of joint kinematics during gait. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  L Blankevoort,et al.  Helical axes of passive knee joint motions. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  C. Spoor,et al.  Rigid body motion calculated from spatial co-ordinates of markers. , 1980, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  J. O'Connor,et al.  Ligaments and articular contact guide passive knee flexion. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  F. Veldpaus,et al.  Finite centroid and helical axis estimation from noisy landmark measurements in the study of human joint kinematics. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  P R Cavanagh,et al.  Three-dimensional kinematics of the human knee during walking. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  J. Kärrholm,et al.  Three‐dimensional knee joint movements during a step‐up: Evaluation after anterior cruciate ligament rupture , 1994, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[15]  V Pinskerova,et al.  Tibiofemoral movement 2: the loaded and unloaded living knee studied by MRI. , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[16]  David G Lloyd,et al.  Repeatability of gait data using a functional hip joint centre and a mean helical knee axis. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Mohamed Mahfouz,et al.  In Vivo Three-Dimensional Determination of Kinematics for Subjects with a Normal Knee or a Unicompartmental or Total Knee Replacement , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  V. Pinskerova,et al.  Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee , 2000 .

[19]  Reinhard Blickhan,et al.  Stabilizing function of antagonistic neuromusculoskeletal systems: an analytical investigation , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[20]  I Söderkvist,et al.  Determining the movements of the skeleton using well-configured markers. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  Guoan Li,et al.  Femoral Rollback After Cruciate-Retaining and Stabilizing Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  V Pinskerova,et al.  Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[23]  Angelo Cappello,et al.  Fluoroscopic and gait analysis of the functional performance in stair ascent of two total knee replacement designs. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[24]  E S Grood,et al.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. , 1983, Journal of biomechanical engineering.