Failure patterns and related risk factors of sagittal reconstruction following pedicle subtraction osteotomy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis and thoracolumbar kyphosis.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to analyze the specific patterns and risk factors of sagittal reconstruction failure in ankylosing spondylitis (AS)-related thoracolumbar kyphosis after pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO). METHODS A retrospective study was performed in patients with AS and thoracolumbar kyphosis after lumbar PSO with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patients were classified as having successful realignment (group A), inadequate correction immediately postoperatively (group B), and sagittal decompensation during follow-up (group C) according to the immediately postoperative and latest follow-up sagittal vertical axis (SVA). Radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes were collected. Pelvic tilt (PT) was used to assess the magnitude of pelvic backward rotation. Hip structural damage and ossification of the anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL) at the proximal junction, PSO level, and distal junction were also evaluated on radiographs. RESULTS Overall, 109 patients with a mean age of 35.3 years were included. Patients in both group B (n = 16) and group C (n = 13) were older than those in group A (n = 80) (mean ages 43.6 vs 32.9 years, p < 0.011; and 39.2 vs 32.9 years, p = 0.018; respectively). Age (OR 1.102, p = 0.011), and preoperative PT (OR 1.171, p = 0.041) and SVA (OR 1.041, p = 0.016) were identified as independent risk factors of inadequate correction. Additionally, a higher distribution of patients with adequate ALL ossification at the PSO level was found in group B than in group A (37.5% vs 22.5%, p = 0.003). Age (OR 1.101, p = 0.011) and preoperative SVA (OR 1.013, p = 0.020) were identified as independent risk factors of sagittal decompensation. Furthermore, compared with group A, group C showed a higher distribution of patients with severe hip structural damage (15.4% vs 0, p = 0.018) and higher incidences of rod fracture (RF) (38.5% vs 8.8%, p = 0.011) and pseudarthrosis (15.4% vs 0, p = 0.018). Additionally, the incidence of RF (19.6% vs 6.9%, p = 0.045) and changes in the proximal junctional angle (0.5° vs 2.2°, p = 0.027) and the distal junctional angle (0.3° vs 2.2°, p = 0.019) were lower during follow-up in patients with adequate ALL ossification than in those without adequate ossification. CONCLUSIONS Sagittal reconstruction failure in patients with AS could be attributed to inadequate correction immediately after surgery (14.7%) and sagittal decompensation during follow-up (11.9%). Adequate ALL ossification was a risk factor of inadequate correction. However, adequate ALL ossification could decrease the development of RF and relieve the junctional kyphotic change during follow-up. Older age and greater baseline SVA were independent risk factors for both inadequate correction and sagittal decompensation.

[1]  K. Ha,et al.  Radiographic findings for surgery-related complications after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for thoracolumbar kyphosis in 230 patients with ankylosing spondylitis. , 2020, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[2]  D. Togawa,et al.  Preoperative and Postoperative Sitting Radiographs for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Upper Instrumented Vertebra Selection Using Sitting C2 Plumb Line Distance to Prevent Proximal Junctional Kyphosis. , 2020, Spine.

[3]  B. Qian,et al.  Impact of cervical range of motion on the global spinal alignment in ankylosing spondylitis patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis following pedicle subtraction osteotomy. , 2020, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[4]  B. Qian,et al.  What is the optimal postoperative sagittal alignment in ankylosing spondylitis patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis following one-level pedicle subtraction osteotomy? , 2019, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[5]  B. Qian,et al.  Does solid fusion eliminate rod fracture after pedicle subtraction osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis-related thoracolumbar kyphosis? , 2019, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[6]  E. Sauleau,et al.  Possible factors associated with sagittal malalignment recurrence after pedicle subtraction osteotomy , 2018, European Spine Journal.

[7]  B. Qian,et al.  The clinical relevance of the presence of bridging syndesmophytes on kyphosis correction and maintenance following pedicle subtraction osteotomy for thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity in ankylosing spondylitis: a comparative cohort study , 2018, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[8]  B. Qian,et al.  The patterns of loss of correction after posterior wedge osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis-related thoracolumbar kyphosis: a minimum of five-year follow-up , 2017, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[9]  A. Mannion,et al.  Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) Score: Development and Validation of a New Method of Analyzing Spinopelvic Alignment to Predict Mechanical Complications After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery , 2017, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  B. Qian,et al.  Mechanisms, Predisposing Factors, and Prognosis of Intraoperative Vertebral Subluxation During Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy in Surgical Correction of Thoracolumbar Kyphosis Secondary to Ankylosing Spondylitis , 2017, Spine.

[11]  Y. Qiu,et al.  The effect of total hip arthroplasty on sagittal spinal–pelvic–leg alignment and low back pain in patients with severe hip osteoarthritis , 2016, European Spine Journal.

[12]  Samuel K. Cho,et al.  Proximal junctional kyphosis following adult spinal deformity surgery , 2014, European Spine Journal.

[13]  M. Aebi,et al.  Junctional spinal disorders in operated adult spinal deformities: present understanding and future perspectives , 2013, European Spine Journal.

[14]  O. Boachie-Adjei,et al.  Sagittal realignment failures following pedicle subtraction osteotomy surgery: are we doing enough?: Clinical article. , 2012, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[15]  G. Demey,et al.  Sagittal balance analysis after pedicle subtraction osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[16]  K. Cho,et al.  Risk Factors of Sagittal Decompensation After Long Posterior Instrumentation and Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis , 2010, Spine.

[17]  J. Buchowski,et al.  Role of Pelvic Incidence, Thoracic Kyphosis, and Patient Factors on Sagittal Plane Correction Following Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy , 2009, Spine.

[18]  L. Lenke,et al.  Selection of the Optimal Distal Fusion Level in Posterior Instrumentation and Fusion for Thoracic Hyperkyphosis: The Sagittal Stable Vertebra Concept , 2004, Spine.

[19]  L. Lenke,et al.  Results of Lumbar Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomies for Fixed Sagittal Imbalance: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-up Study , 2007, Spine.

[20]  Yang-Jin Im,et al.  Spinal Pseudarthrosis in Advanced Ankylosing Spondylitis With Sagittal Plane Deformity: Clinical Characteristics and Outcome Analysis , 2007, Spine.

[21]  K. Bridwell,et al.  Debate: to fuse or not to fuse to the sacrum, the fate of the L5-S1 disc. , 2006, Spine.

[22]  Samuel K. Cho,et al.  Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Following Segmental Posterior Spinal Instrumentation and Fusion: Minimum 5-Year Follow-up , 2005, Spine.

[23]  M. A. van 't Hof,et al.  Assessment of outcome in ankylosing spondylitis: an extended radiographic scoring system , 2004, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[24]  L. Lenke,et al.  Thoracolumbar Deformity Arthrodesis to L5 in Adults: The Fate of the L5-S1 Disc , 2003, Spine.

[25]  A. Calin,et al.  The development and validation of a radiographic grading system for the hip in ankylosing spondylitis: the bath ankylosing spondylitis radiology hip index. , 2000, The Journal of rheumatology.

[26]  E. L. Persons,et al.  Ankylosing Spondylitis , 1955, GP.