Mapping urban morphology: a classification scheme for interpreting contributions to the study of urban form

Urban morphology is a thriving field of enquiry involving researchers from a wide diversity of disciplinary, linguistic and cultural backgrounds. While this diversity has helped advance our understanding of the complexity of urban form, confusion and controversy has also arisen over the various theoretical formulations forwarded by researchers from different philosophical and epistemological backgrounds. With the aim of improving intelligibility in the field, this paper proposes a straightforward scheme to identify, classify and interpret, or 'map', individual contributions to the study of urban form according to their respective theoretical or epistemological perspectives. Drawing upon epistemological discussions familiar to the readers of this journal, the authors first distinguish between cognitive and normative studies. A second distinction is made between internalist studies that consider urban form as a relatively independent system, and externalist studies in which urban form stands as a passive product of various external determinants. Using these basic criteria, it is possible to interpret and synthesize a multitude of contributions and map them using a simple Cartesian grid. The paper highlights how contributions from seemingly different theoretical approaches to urban morphology are intrinsically similar in their treatment of urban form as an object of enquiry.

[1]  Albert Levy,et al.  New orientations in urban morphology , 2005 .

[2]  K. Lynch.  Good city form , 1984 .

[3]  Ivor Samuels,et al.  From description to prescription: reflections on the use of a morphological approach in design guidance , 1997 .

[4]  J. Whitehand.  British urban morphology: the Conzenian tradition , 2001 .

[5]  Lloyd Rodwin,et al.  A Theory of Urban Form , 1958 .

[6]  N. J. Habraken,et al.  The Structure of the Ordinary: Form and Control in the Built Environment , 1998 .

[7]  Lewis Mumford,et al.  The City in History: Its Origins, Its Transformations, and Its Prospects , 1962 .

[8]  Bill Hillier,et al.  Space is the machine , 1996 .

[9]  N. Marzot.  The study of urban form in Italy , 2002, Urban Morphology.

[10]  Leland M. Roth.  The City Shaped: Urban Patterns and Meanings Through History , 1992 .

[11]  Amos Rapoport,et al.  Human Aspects of Urban Form: Towards a Man Environment Approach to Urban Form and Design , 1977 .

[12]  Kevin Lynch,et al.  The Image of the City , 1960 .

[13]  H. Lefèbvre.  La révolution urbaine , 1992 .

[14]  Françoise Boudon,et al.  Système de l'architecture urbaine : le quartier des Halles à Paris , 1977 .

[15]  G. Rondeau,et al.  Introduction à la terminologie , 1981 .

[16]  Peter J. Larkham,et al.  Conservation and the City , 1996 .

[17]  B. Hofmeister.  The study of urban form in Germany , 2003, Urban Morphology.

[18]  Peter J. Larkham,et al.  Conservation and the Changing Urban Landscape , 1992 .

[19]  A. King.  The Social Production of Building form: Theory and Research , 1984 .

[20]  J. Whitehand.  Building Cycles and the Spatial Pattern of Urban Growth , 1972 .

[21]  Michael P. Conzen,et al.  The study of urban form in the United States , 2001, Urban Morphology.

[22]  T. Slater,et al.  The built form of western cities : essays for M.R.G. Conzen on the occasion of his eightieth birthday , 1992 .

[23]  J. Whitehand,et al.  The urban landscape : historical development and management , 1981 .

[24]  J. Vance.  The Continuing City: Urban Morphology in Western Civilization , 1990 .

[25]  M. Conzen.  Alnwick, Northumberland : a study in town-plan analysis , 1960 .

[26]  Jon T. Lang,et al.  Creating Architectural Theory: The Role of the Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design , 1987 .

[27]  P. Calthorpe.  The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream , 1993 .

[28]  B. Hillier,et al.  The Social Logic of Space , 1984 .

[29]  K. Kropf.  An alternative approach to zoning in France: Typology, historical character and development control , 1996 .

[30]  Jeremy Whitehand,et al.  The Making of the Urban Landscape , 1992 .

[31]  Saverio Muratori,et al.  Studi per una operante storia urbana di venezia , 1959 .

[32]  Richard Rodger,et al.  The Changing Face of Cities: A Study of Development Cycles and Urban Form. , 1988 .

[33]  M. Darin,et al.  The study of urban form in France , 1998, Urban Morphology.

[34]  L. Mumford.  The city in history : its origins, its transformations, and its prospects , 1961 .

[35]  A. Moudon.  Urban Morphology as an emerging interdisciplinary field , 2022, Urban Morphology.

[36]  A. Duany,et al.  Suburban Nation: The Rise of Sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream , 2000 .

[37]  J. Gilliland,et al.  The study of urban form in Canada , 2005, Urban Morphology.

[38]  Anne Vernez Moudon,et al.  A Catholic Approach to Organizing What Urban Designers Should Know , 1992 .

[39]  T. Slater.  Family, society and the ornamental villa on the fringes of English country towns , 1978 .

[40]  J. Castex,et al.  Lecture d'une ville: Versailles , 1979 .

[41]  Steve Fett.  URBAN MORPHOLOGY , 2008 .

[42]  Anne Vernez Moudon.  Built for Change: Neighborhood Architecture in San Francisco , 1986 .

[43]  J. Whitehand,et al.  The Physical Fabric of Town Centres: The Agents of Change , 1984 .

[44]  J. Vance,et al.  This scene of man : the role and structure of the city in the geography of Western civilization , 1979 .

[45]  Zeynep Çelik,et al.  Urban Forms and Colonial Confrontations: Algiers Under French Rule , 1997 .

[46]  Jean Ibarz.  The study of urban form in Spain , 1997, Urban Morphology.

[47]  Bill Hillier,et al.  The Social Logic of Space: Preface , 1984 .

[48]  Joseph Rykwert,et al.  The Idea of a Town: The Anthropology of Urban Form in Rome, Italy and the Ancient World , 1976 .