Climate modelling with endogenous technical change: Stochastic learning and optimal greenhouse gas abatement in the PAGE2002 model

This paper looks at the impact of ETC on the costs and benefits of different abatement strategies using a modified version of the PAGE2002 model. It was found that for most standard abatement paths there would be an initial “learning investment” required that would substantially reduce the unit costs of CO2 abatement as compared to a business as usual scenario. Furthermore, optimising an abatement program where ETC has been included leads to an increase in cost uncertainty during the period of widespread CO2 abatements due to our lack of knowledge of the learning investments involved. Finally, the inclusion of ETC leads to a slightly deferred optimised abatement path followed by a rapid abatement program. Together, the results draw attention to the possibilities of ‘uncovering uncertainty’ through proactive abatements. ‘Learning about learning’ could become an important consideration for any plan to optimise future abatements.

[1]  The Marginal Impacts of Co2, Ch4 and Sf6 Emissions , 2003 .

[2]  Pushpam Kumar Agriculture (Chapter8) in IPCC, 2007: Climate change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[3]  Bob van der Zwaan,et al.  The learning potential of photovoltaics: implications for energy policy , 2004 .

[4]  M. Noguer,et al.  Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2002 .

[5]  Michael Grubb,et al.  Induced Technical Change: Evidence and Implications for Energy-Environmental Modelling and Policy , 2000 .

[6]  C. Hope,et al.  Developing the PAGE2002 Model with Endogenous Technical Change , 2006 .

[7]  Sonja Peterson Uncertainty and economic analysis of climate change: A survey of approaches and findings , 2006 .

[8]  Maya Papineau,et al.  An economic perspective on experience curves and dynamic economies in renewable energy technologies , 2006 .

[9]  J Baron,et al.  Can We Use Human Judgments to Determine the Discount Rate? , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[10]  Kmd,et al.  Exploring climate regimes for differentiation of commitments to achieve the EU climate target , 2003 .

[11]  Zong-ci Zhao,et al.  Climate change 2001, the scientific basis, chap. 8: model evaluation. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC , 2001 .

[12]  Chris Hope,et al.  The marginal impact of CO2 from PAGE2002: An integrated assessment model incorporating the IPCC's five reasons for concern , 2006 .

[13]  J. Palutikof,et al.  Climate change 2007 : impacts, adaptation and vulnerability , 2001 .

[14]  David Popp,et al.  Entice: Endogenous Technological Change in the Dice Model of Global Warming , 2003 .

[15]  O. Davidson,et al.  Climate change 2001 : mitigation , 2001 .

[16]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Global experience curves for wind farms , 2005 .

[17]  Socrates Kypreos,et al.  Endogenizing R&D and Market Experience in the "Bottom-Up" Energy-Systems ERIS Model , 2004 .

[18]  I. B. Fridleifsson,et al.  Renewable Energy Technologies , 2000 .

[19]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 2001 : the scientific basis , 2001 .

[20]  M. Lieberman The learning curve, diffusion, and competitive strategy , 1987 .

[21]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Learning curves for environmental technology and their importance for climate policy analysis , 2004 .

[22]  T. P. Wright,et al.  Factors affecting the cost of airplanes , 1936 .

[23]  Andreas Löschel,et al.  Technological Change in Economic Models of Environmental Policy: A Survey , 2002 .

[24]  C. Wene Experience Curves for Energy Technology Policy , 2000 .

[25]  Richard S. J. Tol,et al.  CHIMP: A simple population model for use in integrated assessment of global environmental change , 2005 .

[26]  W. Cline How to Spend $50 Billion to Make the World a Better Place: Meeting the Challenge of Global Warming , 2006 .