Measurement noise propagation in distribution-system state estimation

The distribution power networks are growing in complexity due to the increasing penetration of the distributed power generation such as from wind and solar plants, and distributed resources such as electric vehicles and batteries, which are making the operation of the system more and more challenging. The first step towards more efficient operational capabilities is to introduce an observability of the system. Power system is considered observable, when all its system variables are known, in other words, system variables are chosen in such a way that when known, they allow computation of all other physical quantities in the system. In this paper a State Estimation (SE) software that considers bus voltage magnitudes and phase angles as state variables is presented. To deduce the state of the system from measurements a non-linear relation between measurements and state variables is used. The system is also over-determined, i.e. there are more measurements then state variables. A nonlinear Weighted Least Square (WLS) approach is used to solve the problem at hand with the final goal to demonstrate how quality of measurements affects the quality of power system state awareness. The results are presented in terms of statistical information about the state variables estimated with presented state estimator using generated measurements with added zero-mean Gaussian noise. We show that noise propagation through the SE algorithm is greatly influenced by the selection and placement of measurement devices.

[1]  Sailes K. Sengijpta Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Estimation Theory , 1995 .

[2]  Antonello Monti,et al.  Impact of Different Uncertainty Sources on a Three-Phase State Estimator for Distribution Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[3]  J. Krupa The Quest: Energy, Security, and the Remaking of the Modern World , 2014 .

[4]  Malcolm Irving,et al.  Uncertainty modelling in power system state estimation , 2005 .

[5]  Thomas A. Stuart,et al.  A Sensitivity Analysis of Weighted Least Squares State Estimation for Power Systems , 1973 .

[6]  D. P. Steffen,et al.  The Quest: Energy, Security, and the Remaking of the Modern World , 2011 .

[7]  Mario Paolone,et al.  State estimation of Active Distribution Networks: Comparison between WLS and iterated kalman-filter algorithm integrating PMUs , 2012, 2012 3rd IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT Europe).

[8]  David Macii,et al.  Bayesian linear state estimation using smart meters and PMUs measurements in distribution grids , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm).

[9]  Gorazd Kandus,et al.  A unified three-phase branch model for a distribution-system state estimation , 2016, 2016 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT-Europe).

[10]  Dario Petri,et al.  Uncertainty sensitivity analysis of WLS-based grid state estimators , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Workshop on Applied Measurements for Power Systems Proceedings (AMPS).

[11]  A. W. Kelley,et al.  State estimation for real-time monitoring of distribution systems , 1994 .

[12]  W. H. Kersting,et al.  Radial distribution test feeders , 1991, 2001 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37194).

[13]  Jing Huang,et al.  State Estimation in Electric Power Grids: Meeting New Challenges Presented by the Requirements of the Future Grid , 2012, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[14]  Davide Della Giustina,et al.  Electrical distribution system state estimation: measurement issues and challenges , 2014, IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine.