The effectiveness of specific fire prevention measures for different population groups

There are several different preventive measures that can be used to reduce the number of fire fatalities in residential buildings, but information on how effective different measures are for different groups are, however, lacking. As a result, general measures are often implemented on large portions of the total population, which is not as cost-effective as targeting certain measures for certain groups in the population. Therefore, an analysis of fire statistics and data based on fire investigations reports is performed in this paper in order to provide recommendations for how different preventive measures can be targeted effectively.The studied population is divided into various groups based on the type of measures that are effective for each group, and it is seen that the effectiveness of different preventive measures are depending on age, gender, occupancy type, whether an individual is living alone and whether the individual is a smoker. The effectiveness of the different studied measured are presented in terms of fraction of fatalities averted and the benefit per implemented measure. The results presented in this paper is novel and can be used to motivate targeted interventions and for cost-benefit analyses.

[1]  Nobhojit Roy,et al.  The global burden of injury: incidence, mortality, disability-adjusted life years and time trends from the Global Burden of Disease study 2013 , 2015, Injury Prevention.

[2]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1983 .

[3]  Lynne Warda,et al.  Interventions to Prevent Residential Fire Injury , 2008 .

[4]  David T. Butry,et al.  Economic Performance of Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems , 2009 .

[5]  M. Moffatt,et al.  House fire injury prevention update. Part I. A review of risk factors for fatal and non-fatal house fire injury , 1999, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[6]  Sabina Yeasmin,et al.  'Triangulation' Research Method as the Tool of Social Science Research , 2012 .

[7]  Sara J. Kadolph,et al.  A flammability hazard rating and index for women's apparel , 1987 .

[8]  Stefan Särdqvist,et al.  Fire-Related Mortality in Sweden: Temporal Trends 1952 to 2013 , 2016 .

[9]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[10]  Mikael Svensson,et al.  The value of a statistical life in Sweden: a review of the empirical literature. , 2012, Health policy.

[11]  Nils Johansson,et al.  How could the fire fatalities have been prevented? An analysis of 144 cases during 2011–2014 in Sweden: An analysis , 2016 .

[12]  Carl Bonander,et al.  Differences in Determinants Amongst Individuals Reporting Residential Fires in Sweden: Results from a Cross-Sectional Study , 2015 .

[13]  A. Richard Horrocks,et al.  The particular flammability hazards of nightwear , 2004 .