Assessing coreness and intermediarity of technology sectors using patent co-classification analysis: the case of Korean national R&D

Rapid technological advancements and increasing research and development (R&D) costs are making it necessary for national R&D plans to identify the coreness and intermediarity of technologies in selecting projects and allocating budgets. Studies on the coreness or intermediarity of technology sectors have used patent citations, but there are limitations to dealing with patent data. The limitations arise from the most current patents and patents that do not require citations, e.g. Korean patents. Further, few or no studies have simultaneously considered both coreness and intermediarity. Therefore, we propose a patent co-classification based method to measure coreness and intermediarity of technology sectors by incorporating the analytic network process and the social network analysis. Using IPC co-classifications of patents as technological knowledge flows, this method constructs a network of directed knowledge flows among technology sectors and measures the long-term importance and the intermediating potential of each technology sector, despite the limitations of patent-based analyses. Considering both coreness and intermediarity, this method can provide more detailed and essential knowledge for decision making in planning national R&D. We demonstrated this method using Korean national R&D patents from 2008 to 2011. We expect that this method will help in planning national R&D in a rapidly evolving technological environment.

[1]  Minghong Chen,et al.  Study on Early Warning of Competitive Technical Intelligence Based on the Patent Map , 2010, J. Comput..

[2]  Hariolf Grupp,et al.  Perceptions of Scientification of Innovation as Measured by Referencing Between Patents and Papers: Dynamics in Science-Based Fields of Technology , 1992 .

[3]  R. Hanneman.  Introduction to Social Network Methods , 2001 .

[4]  Xianwen Wang,et al.  Patent co-citation networks of Fortune 500 companies , 2011, Scientometrics.

[5]  Daniel K. N. Johnson.  The OECD Technology Concordance (OTC): Patents by Industry of Manufacture and Sector of Use , 2002 .

[6]  Yongtae Park,et al.  Patent network analysis of inter-industrial knowledge flows: The case of Korea between traditional and emerging industries , 2006 .

[7]  Ying He,et al.  Patent-bibliometric analysis on the Chinese science — technology linkages , 2007, Scientometrics.

[8]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making With Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks , 2005 .

[9]  A. Valle,et al.  Diffusion of nuclear energy in some developing countries , 2014 .

[10]  Rainer Frietsch,et al.  Linking Technology Areas to Industrial Sectors Final Report to the European Commission, DG Research , 2003 .

[11]  Hsin-Yu Shih,et al.  Patent citation network analysis of core and emerging technologies in Taiwan: 1997–2008 , 2011, Scientometrics.

[12]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process : the organization and prioritization of complexity , 1996 .

[13]  Yongtae Park,et al.  Identification of technological knowledge intermediaries , 2010, Scientometrics.

[14]  A. Jaffe.  Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[15]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Measuring intersectoral technology spillovers estimates from the European and US patent office databases , 1997 .

[16]  Hao Song,et al.  Research on R&D Project Risk Management Model , 2009 .

[17]  John Scott.  Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[18]  장진규,et al.  Development of Methodology to Evaluate the Feasibility of Public R&D Investments in New Technologies in Korea , 2006 .

[19]  Samuel Kortum,et al.  Assigning Patents to Industries: Tests of the Yale Technology Concordance , 1997 .

[20]  Pablo Aragonés-Beltrán,et al.  An ANP-based approach for the selection of photovoltaic solar power plant investment projects , 2010 .

[21]  T. Saaty.  Fundamentals of the analytic network process — Dependence and feedback in decision-making with a single network , 2004 .

[22]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Patent classifications as indicators of intellectual organization , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[23]  So Young Sohn,et al.  Impact analysis for national R&D funding in science and technology using quantification method II , 2009 .

[24]  Birgit Aschhoff,et al.  Detecting Behavioural Additionality - an Empirical Study on the Impact of Public R&D Funding on Firms' Cooperative Behaviour in Germany , 2006 .

[25]  Andrew J. Nelson.  Measuring Knowledge Spillovers: What Patents, Licenses and Publications Reveal About Innovation Diffusion , 2009 .

[26]  Hakyeon Lee,et al.  Identifying core technologies based on technological cross-impacts: An association rule mining (ARM) and analytic network process (ANP) approach , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[27]  ChoTa-Shun,et al.  Patent citation network analysis of core and emerging technologies in Taiwan , 2011 .

[28]  Hakyeon Lee,et al.  Evaluation and management of new service concepts: An ANP-based portfolio approach , 2010, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[29]  Rainer Frietsch,et al.  Linking Technology Areas to Industrial Sectors , 2003 .

[30]  Hakyeon Lee,et al.  An ANP-based technology network for identification of core technologies: A case of telecommunication technologies , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[31]  Hakyeon Lee,et al.  Disembodied knowledge flows among industrial clusters: A patent analysis of the Korean manufacturing sector , 2009 .

[32]  Kwangsoo Kim,et al.  Invention property-function network analysis of patents: a case of silicon-based thin film solar cells , 2011, Scientometrics.

[33]  Show-Ling Jang,et al.  Measuring technological diversification: identifying the effects of patent scale and patent scope , 2010, Scientometrics.

[34]  Chen Liu,et al.  Shaping the interdisciplinary knowledge network of China: a network analysis based on citation data from 1981 to 2010 , 2011, Scientometrics.

[35]  이용호,et al.  A Study on the Measurement of Technological Impact using Citation Analysis of Patent Information , 2007 .

[36]  Ajay Mehra.  The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science , 2005 .

[37]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Network Embeddedness and the Exploration of Novel Technologies: Technological Distance, Betweenness Centrality and Density , 2006 .

[38]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  MERIT concordance table: IPC - ISIC (rev.2) , 1994 .

[39]  Pier Paolo Saviotti,et al.  The knowledge-base evolution in biotechnology: a social network analysis , 2011 .

[40]  Parimal Patel,et al.  The continuing, widespread (and neglected) importance of improvements in mechanical technologies , 1994 .

[41]  R. P. Mohanty,et al.  A fuzzy ANP-based approach to R&D project selection: A case study , 2005 .

[42]  魏屹东,et al.  Scientometrics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[43]  J. Galende,et al.  Internal factors determining a firm’s innovative behaviour , 2003 .

[44]  Yongtae Park,et al.  A Taxonomy of Industries Based on Knowledge Flow Structure , 1999 .

[45]  Fang-Ming Hsu,et al.  The effect of government-sponsored R&D programmes on additionality in recipient firms in Taiwan , 2009 .

[46]  C. Baden‐Fuller,et al.  The Influence of Technological Knowledge Base and Organizational Structure on Technology Collaboration , 2010 .

[47]  Domenico Caputo,et al.  Silicon Based Thin Film Solar Cells , 2013 .

[48]  Leonard M. Freeman,et al.  A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .

[49]  Tuomo Kässi,et al.  Patent citations as a tool for analysing the early stages of convergence , 2013 .

[50]  Wilfred Dolfsma,et al.  Government policy and technological innovation—a suggested typology , 2013 .

[51]  Uk Jung,et al.  An ANP approach for R&D project evaluation based on interdependencies between research objectives and evaluation criteria , 2010, Decis. Support Syst..

[52]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  Mapping of biotechnology patents of China from 1995–2008 , 2011, Scientometrics.