Revising chronological uncertainties in marine archives using global anthropogenic signals: a case study on the oceanic 13C Suess effect

. Marine sediments are excellent archives for reconstructing past changes in climate and ocean circulation. Overlapping with instrumental records they hold the potential to elucidate natural variability and contextualize current changes. Yet, dating uncertainties of traditional approaches (e.g., up to ±30-50 years, for the last two centuries) pose major challenges for integrating the shorter instrumental records with these extended marine archives. Hence, robust sediment chronologies are 15 crucial and most existing age model constraints do not provide sufficient age control, particularly for the 20 th century, which is the most critical period for comparing proxy records to historical changes. Here we propose a novel chronostratigraphic approach that uses anthropogenic signals such as the oceanic 13 C Suess effect and spheroidal carbonaceous fly ash particles to reduce age model uncertainties in high-resolution marine archives. As a test, we apply this new approach to a marine sediment core located at the Gardar Drift, in the subpolar North Atlantic, and revise the previously published age model for this site. We 20 further provide refined estimate of regional reservoir corrections and uncertainties for Gardar Drift.

[1]  G. Gerdts,et al.  The East Gotland Basin (Baltic Sea) as a candidate Global boundary Stratotype Section and Point for the Anthropocene series , 2022, The Anthropocene Review.

[2]  P. Appleby,et al.  Detection of a hot 137Cs particle in marine sediments from Norway: potential implication for 137Cs dating , 2021, Geo-Marine Letters.

[3]  Byron A. Steinman,et al.  Absence of internal multidecadal and interdecadal oscillations in climate model simulations , 2020, Nature Communications.

[4]  N. Rose,et al.  Anomalously weak Labrador Sea convection and Atlantic overturning during the past 150 years , 2018, Nature.

[5]  E. Jansen,et al.  A signal of persistent Atlantic multidecadal variability in Arctic sea ice , 2014 .

[6]  A. Dyke,et al.  The exaggerated radiocarbon age of deposit‐feeding molluscs in calcareous environments , 2013 .

[7]  Rainer Zahn,et al.  Seasonal patterns of shell flux, δ18O and δ13C of small and large N. pachyderma (s) and G. bulloides in the subpolar North Atlantic , 2013 .

[8]  P. Ascough,et al.  Methodological approaches to determining the marine radiocarbon reservoir effect , 2005 .

[9]  D. Lea,et al.  Seasonal and interannual variation in Santa Barbara Basin water temperatures observed in sediment trap foraminiferal Mg/Ca , 2004 .

[10]  J. Betancourt,et al.  A tree‐ring based reconstruction of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation since 1567 A.D. , 2004 .

[11]  G. Ganssen,et al.  The isotopic signature of planktonic foraminifera from NE Atlantic surface sediments: implications for the reconstruction of past oceanic conditions , 2000, Journal of the Geological Society.

[12]  R. Schiebel,et al.  Population dynamics of the planktic foraminifer Globigerina bulloides from the eastern North Atlantic , 1997 .

[13]  P. Reimer,et al.  A Marine Reservoir Correction Database and On-Line Interface , 2001, Radiocarbon.

[14]  J. N. Smith,et al.  Why should we believe 210Pb sediment geochronologies? , 2001, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[15]  Neil L. Rose,et al.  A note on further refinements to a procedure for the extraction of carbonaceous fly-ash particles from sediments , 1994 .

[16]  Paula J. Reimer,et al.  A Computer Program for Radiocarbon Age Calibration , 1986, Radiocarbon.

[17]  C. D. Keeling The Suess effect: 13Carbon-14Carbon interrelations , 1979 .

[18]  J. Galloway A Review of the , 1901 .