Developing and trialing a measure of group thinking

Abstract This paper offers a critical review of the issue of assessing the quality of group thinking, describes the development of a Group Thinking Measure that fills a gap revealed by the literature and illustrates the use of this measure, in combination with interpretative discourse analysis, as a way of distinguishing those behaviors that add value to group thinking from those behaviors that detract value. The Group Thinking Measure combines two tests of equal difficulty, one for individual use and one for use by triads. This enables a measure not only of how well groups are thinking together but also a correlation between individual thinking and group thinking. This innovation gives an indication of whether or not working in a group adds value and so the extent to which a classroom culture supports collaborative thinking.

[1]  Hanni Muukkonen,et al.  Technology-Mediated Progressive Inquiry in Higher Education , 2005, Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology.

[2]  E. Matusov.  Irreconcilable differences in Vygotsky’s and Bakhtin’s approaches to the social and the individual: An educational perspective , 2011 .

[3]  N. Mercer,et al.  Dialogue and the Development of Children's Thinking: A Sociocultural Approach , 2007 .

[4]  N. Mercer,et al.  Reasoning as a scientist: ways of helping children to use language to learn science , 2004 .

[5]  Christine Howe,et al.  Classroom dialogue: a systematic review across four decades of research , 2013 .

[6]  N. Mercer,et al.  Children's Talk and the Development of Reasoning in the Classroom , 1999 .

[7]  David Engel,et al.  Collective Intelligence in Computer-Mediated Collaboration Emerges in Different Contexts and Cultures , 2015, CHI.

[8]  S. Michaels,et al.  Deliberative Discourse Idealized and Realized: Accountable Talk in the Classroom and in Civic Life , 2008 .

[9]  D. Meyer,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S6 References Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups , 2022 .

[10]  J. Wertsch.  Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind , 1985 .

[11]  Anderson Luiz Machado,et al.  Distance Education and Online Dialogues: Between Themes and Identities , 2015 .

[12]  R. Wegerif,et al.  The importance of dialogic processes to conceptual development in mathematics , 2015 .

[13]  E. White.  Introducing Dialogic Pedagogy: Provocations for the Early Years , 2015 .

[14]  Douglas R. Barnes,et al.  Communication and learning in small groups , 1977 .

[15]  Neil Mercer,et al.  Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: The value and potential of sociocultural theory , 2012 .

[16]  Martin Nystrand,et al.  Discussion-Based Approaches to Developing Understanding: Classroom Instruction and Student Performance in Middle and High School English , 2003 .

[17]  Neil Mercer,et al.  Words and Minds : How We Use Language to Think Together , 2000 .

[18]  Neil Mercer,et al.  Sociocultural discourse analysis: analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking , 2007 .

[19]  E. Matusov.  Intersubjectivity Without Agreement , 1996 .

[20]  Ramon Flecha,et al.  Sharing Words: Theory and Practice of Dialogic Learning , 2000 .

[21]  Neil Mercer,et al.  Re-Conceptualizing "Scaffolding" and the Zone of Proximal Development in the Context of Symmetrical Collaborative Learning. , 2015 .

[22]  R. Wegerif.  Dialogic Education and Technology: Expanding the Space of Learning , 2007 .

[23]  Karen Barad.  Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning , 2007 .

[24]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Collaborative reasoning: a dialogic approach to group discussions , 2009 .

[25]  Yang Yang.  Lessons learnt from contextualising a UK teaching thinking program in a conventional Chinese classroom , 2016 .

[26]  N. Mercer,et al.  From social interaction to individual reasoning: an empirical investigation of a possible socio-cultural model of cognitive development , 1999 .

[27]  J. Kounios,et al.  The Aha! Moment , 2009 .

[28]  M. Nystrand.  Research on the Role of Classroom Discourse As It Affects Reading Comprehension , 2006 .

[29]  RUPERT WEGERIF,et al.  Using computers to help coach exploratory talk across the curriculum , 1996, Comput. Educ..

[30]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Using Exploratory Talk to Enhance Problem-solving and Reasoning Skills in Grade-7 Science Classrooms , 2006 .

[31]  N. Webb.  Peer interaction and learning in small groups , 1989 .

[32]  Klaas Sijtsma,et al.  On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha , 2008, Psychometrika.

[33]  R. Wegerif.  Towards a Dialogic Theory of How Children Learn to Think. , 2011 .

[34]  J. Kincheloe.  On to the Next Level: Continuing the Conceptualization of the Bricolage , 2005 .

[35]  S Rojas-Drummod,et al.  Talking for reasoning among Mexican primary school children , 2003 .

[36]  Cathy Ota,et al.  Improving the effects of group working in classrooms with young school-aged children: Facilitating attainment, interaction and classroom activity , 2008 .

[37]  Brigid Barron.  When Smart Groups Fail , 2003 .

[38]  R. Wegerif.  Dialogic: Education for the Internet Age , 2013 .

[39]  Lauren B. Resnick,et al.  Re-thinking Intelligence: schools that build the mind , 2015 .

[40]  R. Wegerif.  Dialogic or dialectic? The significance of ontological assumptions in research on educational dialogue , 2008 .

[41]  The use of Quality Talk to increase critical analytical speaking and writing of students in three secondary schools , 2016 .

[42]  D. Kuhn.  Thinking Together and Alone , 2015 .

[43]  Gerry Stahl,et al.  Group Cognition: Computer Support for Building Collaborative Knowledge (Acting with Technology) , 2006 .

[44]  Jorge Larreamendy-Joerns,et al.  “You're going to want to find out which and prove it”: collective argumentation in a mathematics classroom , 1998 .

[45]  C. Howe.  Scaffolding in context: Peer interaction and abstract learning , 2013 .

[46]  Deborah Osberg,et al.  “Enlarging the Space of the Possible” Around What it Means to Educate and Be Educated , 2009 .

[47]  J. Nunnally.  Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[48]  Timothy Koschmann.  Theories of learning and studies of instructional practice , 2011 .

[49]  J. Kounios,et al.  The Eureka Factor: Aha Moments, Creative Insight, and the Brain , 2015 .

[50]  Neil Mercer,et al.  Thinking together in the UK and Mexico: transfer of an educational innovation , 2005 .