Layout optimization with h‐adaptivity of structures

In this paper, we propose a new procedure for the layout optimization of structures making use of h-adaptive methods. The method combines the topology optimization and the existing h-adaptive finite element methods in order to: (i) improve the definition of the material boundary, i.e. the contour between the material and void regions; (ii) reduce the effective number of design variables; and (iii) bound the relative solution error. The refinement strategy is applied to a given element if: (a) the measure of the quality of the element is below a given lower bound; (b) the element is a ‘material element’ or has a side which forms the ‘material boundary’ of the given optimum layout; and (c) the element average error estimate is larger than a multiple of the average error of the mesh. After the h-adaptive refinement, the mesh quality is improved with the application of a conditional Laplacian smoothing process. The formulation of the optimization problem is defined by the minimization of the compliance of the structure subjected to a volume and side constraints. The design variable is then the average density of the material, which is considered to be constant within each finite element. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  J. W. Bull,et al.  Self‐designing structures: a practical approach , 1998 .

[2]  Yi Min Xie,et al.  Shape and topology design for heat conduction by Evolutionary Structural Optimization , 1999 .

[3]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method , 1988 .

[4]  Yi Min Xie,et al.  On various aspects of evolutionary structural optimization for problems with stiffness constraints , 1997 .

[5]  E. Hinton,et al.  Fully stressed topological design of structures using an evolutionary procedure , 1995 .

[6]  J. W. Bull,et al.  Reverse adaptivity - a new evolutionary tool for structural optimization , 1999 .

[7]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  The three R's of engineering analysis and error estimation and adaptivity , 1990 .

[8]  J. Petersson,et al.  Numerical instabilities in topology optimization: A survey on procedures dealing with checkerboards, mesh-dependencies and local minima , 1998 .

[9]  Katsuyuki Suzuki,et al.  Structural Optimization of a Linearly Elastic Structure using the Homogenization Method , 1991 .

[10]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  Adaptivity and mesh generation , 1991 .

[11]  Noboru Kikuchi,et al.  Topology and Generalized Layout Optimization of Elastic Structures , 1993 .

[12]  Y. Xie,et al.  Computational efficiency and validation of bi-directional evolutionary structural optimisation , 2000 .

[13]  Martin P. Bendsøe,et al.  Integrated topology and boundary shape optimization of 2-D solids , 1991 .

[14]  Yi Min Xie,et al.  TOPOLOGY OPTIMIZATION OF STRUCTURES UNDER DYNAMIC RESPONSE CONSTRAINTS , 2000 .

[15]  Y. Xie,et al.  Evolutionary structural optimisation using an additive algorithm , 2000 .

[16]  Grant P. Steven,et al.  Evolutionary structural optimization for dynamic problems , 1996 .

[17]  Martin P. Bendsøe,et al.  Optimization of Structural Topology, Shape, And Material , 1995 .

[18]  H. Chickermane,et al.  Design of multi-component structural systems for optimal layout topology and joint locations , 1997, Engineering with Computers.

[19]  Zheng-Dong Ma,et al.  Optimal Shape and Topology Design of Vibrating Structures , 1995 .

[20]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization , 1999 .