An Evaluation of Microwave Land Surface Emissivities Over the Continental United States to Benefit GPM-Era Precipitation Algorithms

Passive microwave (PMW) satellite-based precipitation over land algorithms rely on physical models to define the most appropriate channel combinations to use in the retrieval, yet typically require considerable empirical adaptation of the model for use with the satellite measurements. Although low-frequency channels are better suited to measure the emission due to liquid associated with rain, most techniques to date rely on high-frequency, scattering-based schemes since the low-frequency methods are limited to the highly variable land surface background, whose radiometric contribution is substantial and can vary more than the contribution of the rain signal. Thus, emission techniques are generally useless over the majority of the Earth's surface. As a first step toward advancing to globally useful physical retrieval schemes, an intercomparison project was organized to determine the accuracy and variability of several emissivity retrieval schemes. A three-year period (July 2004-June 2007) over different targets with varying surface characteristics was developed. The PMW radiometer data used includes the Special Sensor Microwave Imagers, SSMI Sounder, Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E), Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Microwave Imager (TMI), Advanced Microwave Sounding Units, and Microwave Humidity Sounder, along with land surface model emissivity estimates. Results from three specific targets in North America were examined. While there are notable discrepancies among the estimates, similar seasonal trends and associated variability were noted. Because of differences in the treatment surface temperature in the various techniques, it was found that comparing the product of temperature and emissivity yielded more insight than when comparing the emissivity alone. This product is the major contribution to the overall signal measured by PMW sensors and, if it can be properly retrieved, will improve the utility of emission techniques for over land precipitation retrievals. As a more rigorous means of comparison, these emissivity time series were analyzed jointly with precipitation data sets, to examine the emissivity response immediately following rain events. The results demonstrate that while the emissivity structure can be fairly well characterized for certain surface types, there are other more complex surfaces where the underlying variability is more than can be captured with the PMW channels. The implications for Global Precipitation Measurement-era algorithms suggest that physical retrievals are feasible over vegetated land during the warm seasons.

[1]  N. Bormann,et al.  IMPROVED USE OF SURFACE-SENSITIVE MICROWAVE RADIANCES AT ECMWF , 2009 .

[2]  Thomas J. Jackson,et al.  WindSat Global Soil Moisture Retrieval and Validation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  J. Janowiak,et al.  COMPARISON OF NEAR-REAL-TIME PRECIPITATION ESTIMATES FROM SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS AND NUMERICAL MODELS , 2007 .

[4]  E. Njoku,et al.  Vegetation and surface roughness effects on AMSR-E land observations , 2006 .

[5]  C. Matzler,et al.  On the determination of surface emissivity from Satellite observations , 2005, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[6]  Filipe Aires,et al.  Land Surface Microwave Emissivities over the Globe for a Decade , 2006 .

[7]  W. Rossow,et al.  Advances in understanding clouds from ISCCP , 1999 .

[8]  Florence Rabier,et al.  Toward a Better Modeling of Surface Emissivity to Improve AMSU Data Assimilation Over Antarctica , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[9]  John E. Janowiak,et al.  Diurnal cycle of precipitation determined from the CMORPH high spatial and temporal resolution global precipitation analyses , 2005 .

[10]  P. Rosenkranz Water vapor microwave continuum absorption: A comparison of measurements and models , 1998 .

[11]  Filipe Aires,et al.  A Parameterization of the Microwave Land Surface Emissivity Between 19 and 100 GHz, Anchored to Satellite-Derived Estimates , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[12]  J. D. Tarpley,et al.  Implementation of Noah land surface model advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational mesoscale Eta model , 2003 .

[13]  Valentine G. Anantharaj,et al.  Soil Moisture Sensitivity to NRL-Blend High-Resolution Precipitation Products: Analysis of Simulations With Two Land Surface Models , 2010, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[14]  Gail Skofronick Jackson,et al.  Surface and Atmospheric Contributions to Passive Microwave Brightness Temperatures , 2010 .

[15]  Catherine Prigent,et al.  Calculation of microwave land surface emissivity from satellite observations: validity of the specular approximation over snow-free surfaces? , 2005, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[16]  Fuzhong Weng,et al.  Use of a One-Dimensional Variational Retrieval to Diagnose Estimates of Infrared and Microwave Surface Emissivity Over Land for ATOVS Sounding Instruments , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[17]  Filipe Aires,et al.  A Tool to Estimate Land‐Surface Emissivities at Microwave frequencies (TELSEM) for use in numerical weather prediction , 2011 .

[18]  F. Ulaby,et al.  Microwave Dielectric Behavior of Wet Soil-Part II: Dielectric Mixing Models , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[19]  Catherine Prigent,et al.  Microwave signatures over carbonate sedimentary platforms in arid areas: Potential geological applications of passive microwave observations? , 2005 .

[20]  Rong Fu,et al.  A Practical Method for Retrieving Land Surface Temperature From AMSR-E Over the Amazon Forest , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[21]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  Satellite Microwave Remote Sensing of Daily Land Surface Air Temperature Minima and Maxima From AMSR-E , 2010, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[22]  Ralph Ferraro,et al.  The Fourth International Precipitation Working Group Workshop , 2010 .

[23]  F. Martin Ralph,et al.  Improving Short-Term (0–48 h) Cool-Season Quantitative Precipitation Forecasting: Recommendations from a USWRP Workshop , 2005 .

[24]  Fuzhong Weng,et al.  Retrieval of snow surface microwave emissivity from the advanced microwave sounding unit , 2008 .

[25]  Ralph Ferraro,et al.  TRMM 2A12 Land Precipitation Product - Status and Future Plans , 2009 .

[26]  Andrew S. Jones,et al.  Retrieval of microwave surface emittance over land using coincident microwave and infrared satellite measurements , 1997 .

[27]  Y. Hong,et al.  The TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA): Quasi-Global, Multiyear, Combined-Sensor Precipitation Estimates at Fine Scales , 2007 .

[28]  Ralph Ferraro,et al.  Status of the TRMM 2A12 Land Precipitation Algorithm , 2010 .

[29]  Catherine Prigent,et al.  Microwave land emissivity calculations using AMSU measurements , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[30]  G. Gayno,et al.  Implementation of Noah land-surface model advances in the NCEP operational mesoscale Eta model , 2003 .

[31]  F. J. Turk,et al.  Toward improved characterization of remotely sensed precipitation regimes with MODIS/AMSR-E blended data techniques , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[32]  B. Choudhury,et al.  Remote sensing of soil moisture content over bare field at 1.4 GHz frequency , 1981 .

[33]  Fuzhong Weng,et al.  A microwave land emissivity model , 2001 .

[34]  E. Njoku,et al.  Passive microwave remote sensing of soil moisture , 1996 .

[35]  Patrick Minnis,et al.  Observational evidence of changes in water vapor, clouds, and radiation at the ARM SGP site , 2006 .

[36]  Li Li,et al.  Retrieval of land surface parameters using passive microwave measurements at 6-18 GHz , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[37]  R. Reynolds,et al.  The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project , 1996, Renewable Energy.

[38]  Sujay V. Kumar,et al.  Land information system: An interoperable framework for high resolution land surface modeling , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[39]  Florence Rabier,et al.  Global 4DVAR Assimilation and Forecast Experiments Using AMSU Observations over Land. Part I: Impacts of Various Land Surface Emissivity Parameterizations , 2010 .

[40]  Florence Rabier,et al.  Global 4DVAR Assimilation and Forecast Experiments Using AMSU Observations over Land. Part II: Impacts of Assimilating Surface-Sensitive Channels on the African Monsoon during AMMA , 2010 .

[41]  F. Aires,et al.  A new neural network approach including first guess for retrieval of atmospheric water vapor, cloud liquid water path, surface temperature, and emissivities over land from satellite microwave observations , 2001 .

[42]  Florence Rabier,et al.  Potential Use of Surface-Sensitive Microwave Observations Over Land in Numerical Weather Prediction , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[43]  Walter A. Petersen NASA GPM/PMM Participation in the Canadian CloudSat/Calipso Validation Project (C3VP): Physical process studies in snow , 2007 .

[44]  Min-Jeong Kim,et al.  A physical model to determine snowfall over land by microwave radiometry , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[45]  Catherine Prigent,et al.  Microwave land surface emissivities estimated from SSM/I observations , 1997 .

[46]  Wanchun Chen,et al.  MiRS: An All-Weather 1DVAR Satellite Data Assimilation and Retrieval System , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.