Response selection in visual search: the influence of response compatibility of nontargets.

The authors used visual search tasks in which components of the classic flanker task (B. A. Eriksen & C. W. Eriksen, 1974) were introduced. In several experiments the authors obtained evidence of parallel search for a target among distractor elements. Therefore, 2-stage models of visual search predict no effect of the identity of those distractors. However, clear compatibility effects of the distractors were obtained: Responses were faster when the distractors were compatible with the response than when they were incompatible. These results show that even in parallel search tasks identity information is extracted from the distractors. In addition, alternative interpretations of the results in terms of the occasional identification of a distractor before or after the target was identified could be ruled out. The results showed that flat search slopes obtained in visual search experiments provide no benchmark for preattentive processing.

[1]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles , 1988 .

[2]  U. Neisser.  VISUAL SEARCH. , 1964, Scientific American.

[3]  M. Carrasco,et al.  The temporal dynamics of visual search: evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  V. J. Dark,et al.  Attentional processing of “unattended” flankers: Evidence for a failure of selective attention , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  H J Müller,et al.  Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  B. Julesz,et al.  Fast noninertial shifts of attention. , 1985, Spatial vision.

[7]  A. Treisman.  Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[8]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Postattentive vision. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  J. Duncan.  Divided attention: the whole is more than the sum of its parts. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  M. Cheal,et al.  Attention and nontarget effects in the location-cuing paradigm , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  S. Yantis.  On analog movements of visual attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  A. Treisman,et al.  Conjunction search revisited. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature binding, attention and object perception. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[14]  S A Hillyard,et al.  Spatial gradients of visual attention: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Tests of the automaticity of reading: dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  C M Francolini,et al.  On the nonautomaticity of “automatic” activation: Evidence of selective seeing , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Preattentive Object Files: Shapeless Bundles of Basic Features , 1997, Vision Research.

[19]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  G. Keren.  Some considerations of two alleged kinds of selective attention. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[21]  R. A. Kinchla,et al.  Detecting target elements in multielement arrays: A confusability model , 1974 .

[22]  J. Deutsch.  Perception and Communication , 1958, Nature.

[23]  C. J. Downing.  Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: effects on perceptual quality. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  D. LaBerge,et al.  Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. , 1989 .

[25]  E. Donchin,et al.  Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[26]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  G. Logan,et al.  Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention , 1996 .

[28]  Jon Driver,et al.  On the nonselectivity of "selective" seeing: Contrasts between interference and priming in selective attention. , 1989 .

[29]  Jeff F. Miller.  The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: A search for boundary conditions , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[31]  H. J. Muller,et al.  SEarch via Recursive Rejection (SERR): A Connectionist Model of Visual Search , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[32]  Richard M. Shiffrin,et al.  7. Processing visual information in an unattended location , 1996 .

[33]  B. Murdock.  A parallel-processing model for scanning , 1971 .

[34]  N. Lavie,et al.  On the Efficiency of Visual Selective Attention: Efficient Visual Search Leads to Inefficient Distractor Rejection , 1997 .

[35]  A. Cohen,et al.  Intra- and cross-dimensional visual search for single-feature targets , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[37]  J. Jonides.  Further toward a model of the Mind’s eye’s movement , 1983 .

[38]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  On the locus of visual selection: evidence from focused attention tasks. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  G. Sperling,et al.  Episodic theory of the dynamics of spatial attention. , 1995 .

[40]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  C. Eriksen,et al.  An electromyographic examination of response competition , 1985 .

[42]  S. Rose.  Selective attention , 1992, Nature.

[43]  J. Ridley.  Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .

[44]  J. H. Bertera,et al.  Latency of sequential eye movements: implications for reading. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  J. Palmer,et al.  Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  David A. Taylor.  Time Course of Context Effects. , 1977 .

[47]  David LaBerge,et al.  Spatial extent of attention to letters and words , 1983 .

[48]  N. Lavie.  Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  M. Shaw,et al.  Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial locations. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[50]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance , 2004 .

[51]  P. Goolkasian,et al.  Covert and Overt Attention and the Processing of Cues for Location and Target Identification. , 1999, The Journal of general psychology.

[52]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Attentional control during visual search: the effect of irrelevant singletons. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  J. Henderson,et al.  The spatial distribution of attention following an exogenous cue , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[54]  H. Egeth,et al.  Searching for conjunctively defined targets. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[55]  Y. Tsal.  Movements of attention across the visual field. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[56]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .

[57]  S M Anstis,et al.  Letter: A chart demonstrating variations in acuity with retinal position. , 1974, Vision research.

[58]  David E. Rumelhart,et al.  A multicomponent theory of the perception of briefly exposed visual displays , 1970 .

[59]  G. Grice,et al.  Temporal characteristics of noise conditions producing facilitation and interference , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[60]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[61]  G Mulder,et al.  Selective response activation can begin before stimulus recognition is complete: a psychophysiological and error analysis of continuous flow. , 1990, Acta psychologica.

[62]  C W Eriksen,et al.  Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[63]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[64]  J Miller,et al.  Priming is not necessary for selective-attention failures: Semantic effects of unattended, unprimed letters , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[65]  Asher Cohen,et al.  Perceptual Dimensional Constraints in Response Selection Processes , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[66]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[67]  J. Townsend.  SOME RESULTS CONCERNING THE IDENTIFIABILITY OF PARALLEL AND SERIAL PROCESSES , 1972 .

[68]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  SEARCH FOR A CONJUNCTIVELY DEFINED TARGET CAN BE SELECTIVELY LIMITED TO A COLOR-DEFINED SUBSET OF ELEMENTS , 1995 .

[69]  Todd S. Horowitz,et al.  Visual search has no memory , 1998, Nature.

[70]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. , 1990, Science.