Challenges for a fully IP-based broadband satellite system

A number of broadband satellite systems have been proposed in recent years, offering alternative technical solutions. In order to reduce the cost of user equipment and expand the market of satellite services, it should be possible in the future to achieve a high level of commonality of user terminals between different satellite systems, even if different transmission schemes are used. IP-based transport is an established solution for provisioning of generic services. It is also a means of unifying different underlying networks to provide interworking between them, for example between satellite and terrestrial networks such as the Internet. Nevertheless, special support or adaptation of IP is needed over satellite networks to ensure such features as QoS for multimedia services, fair access to satellite resources, efficient use of radio resources especially for bursty traffic. Therefore, a generic satellite system (and terminal) architecture based on IP services and incorporating the qualities above was defined to allow flexibility for alternative satellite technologies. This was the main objective of the BRAHMS project, whose results were further developed in the SATIP6 project, both sponsored within the 5th European Research Framework in the area of IST (Information Society and Technology). The BRAHMS project, in particular, greatly contributed to the standardization activity in the field of broadband satellite access especially within the ETSI BSM working group.

[1]  Van Jacobson,et al.  Compressing IP/UDP/RTP Headers for Low-Speed Serial Links , 1999, RFC.

[2]  Allan C. Rubens,et al.  Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) , 2000, RFC.

[3]  Randall J. Atkinson,et al.  Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol , 1995, RFC.

[4]  John Wroclawski,et al.  Specification of the Controlled-Load Network Element Service , 1997, RFC.

[5]  David L. Black,et al.  Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers , 1998, RFC.

[6]  Mark Allman,et al.  Enhancing TCP Over Satellite Channels using Standard Mechanisms , 1999, RFC.

[7]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Mobile IP Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting Requirements , 2000, RFC.

[8]  Francesco Delli Priscoli Interworking of a satellite system for mobile multimedia applications with the terrestrial networks , 1999, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[9]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Minimal Encapsulation within IP , 1996, RFC.

[10]  Louis A. Mamakos,et al.  A Method for Transmitting PPP Over Ethernet (PPPoE) , 1999, RFC.

[11]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Mobile IP Network Access Identifier Extension for IPv4 , 2000, RFC.

[12]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Mobility support in IPv6 , 1996, MobiCom '96.

[13]  Scott Shenker,et al.  Specification of Guaranteed Quality of Service , 1997, RFC.

[14]  Scott Shenker,et al.  Integrated Services in the Internet Architecture : an Overview Status of this Memo , 1994 .

[15]  Glen Zorn,et al.  RADIUS Attributes for Tunnel Protocol Support , 2000, RFC.

[16]  Van Jacobson,et al.  A Two-bit Differentiated Services Architecture for the Internet , 1999, RFC.

[17]  Charles Hornig A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams over Ethernet Networks , 1984, RFC.

[18]  Antonio Pietrabissa,et al.  Validation of a QoS architecture for DVB-RCS satellite networks via the SATIP6 demonstration platform , 2005, Comput. Networks.

[19]  Luca Becchetti,et al.  Enhancing IP service provision over heterogeneous wireless networks: a path toward 4G , 2001 .

[20]  Lixia Zhang,et al.  Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP) - Version 1 Functional Specification , 1997, RFC.