Foliar deposition and coverage on young apple trees with PWM-controlled spray systems

Abstract Pulse width modulation (PWM) technology is recently introduced into orchard air-blast sprayers to achieve precision applications of plant protection products and reduce risks to the environment and ecosystems. Field tests in a two-year old, multi-row apple orchard were conducted to study the foliar spray deposition generated by three systems attached to an air-blast orchard sprayer: 1) a manually-PWM-controlled spray system producing a constant-rate application (Manual-PWM), 2) a laser-guided PWM-controlled intelligent spray system producing a variable-rate application (Laser-PWM), and 3) the same laser-guided spray system with disabled PWM control producing a constant-rate application (Disabled-PWM). The capability of applying sprays on multiple tree rows beyond the first target row was also quantitatively evaluated for the three systems. Test results showed that the Manual-PWM and Disabled-PWM produced greater spray deposits and coverage with over-sprayed potentials on the first target row trees than Laser-PWM. However, spray coverage results indicated that Laser-PWM provided higher uniformity across the tree canopy and a stronger relationship between spray deposits and coverage for all the rows than other two systems. Moreover, Laser-PWM used 67% and 76% less spray volume than Manual-PWM and Disabled-PWM, respectively. Test results also demonstrated that spray deposit densities on trees discharged from all three spray systems exceeded thresholds for effective fungicide and insecticide applications (proposed by pesticide manufacturers), not only in the first target row but also second and further downstream rows. A single spray pass from each of the three systems could provide adequate spray deposits and coverage on the two-year old young trees in the first two rows, thereby offering opportunities to save pesticides and reduce labor costs. Future field biological tests to verify the efficacy of these spray systems are necessary to confirm these hypotheses.

[1]  R. C. Derksen,et al.  VALIDATION OF A LASER-GUIDED VARIABLE-RATE SPRAYER FOR MANAGING INSECTS IN ORNAMENTAL NURSERIES , 2017 .

[2]  Martin J. Bukovac,et al.  Characterizing pesticide and surfactant penetration with isolated plant cuticles , 1993 .

[3]  Heping Zhu,et al.  Spray deposition inside tree canopies from a newly developed variable-rate air-assisted sprayer , 2013 .

[4]  Tomàs Pallejà,et al.  Real time canopy density estimation using ultrasonic envelope signals in the orchard and vineyard , 2015, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[5]  D. K. Giles,et al.  Intermittent control of liquid flow from fan nozzles in concurrent air streams : wind tunnel studies of droplet size effects , 1995 .

[6]  Alexandre Escolà,et al.  Spatial variability in commercial orange groves. Part 1: canopy volume and height , 2018, Precision Agriculture.

[7]  P Balsari,et al.  Developing strategies to reduce spray drift in pneumatic spraying in vineyards: Assessment of the parameters affecting droplet size in pneumatic spraying. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[8]  M. Grieshop,et al.  Spray coverage and pest management efficacy of a solid set canopy delivery system in high density apples. , 2019, Pest management science.

[9]  G. Kruger,et al.  Spray droplet size and carrier volume effect on dicamba and glufosinate efficacy. , 2018, Pest management science.

[10]  E. A. Anglund,et al.  FIELD EVALUATION OF RESPONSE TIMES FOR A VARIABLE RATE (PRESSURE–BASED AND INJECTION) LIQUID CHEMICAL APPLICATORS , 2003 .

[11]  Karl Mierzejewski,et al.  Effects of droplet density and concentration on the efficacy of bacillus thuringiensis and carbaryl against gypsy moth larvae (Lymantria dispar L.) , 1995 .

[12]  Emanuele Cerruto,et al.  A model to estimate the spray deposit by simulated water sensitive papers , 2019, Crop Protection.

[13]  Ding Weimin,et al.  Effects of fan speed on spray deposition and drift for targeting air-assisted sprayer in pear orchard , 2016 .

[14]  Heping Zhu,et al.  Spray Drift and Off-Target Loss Reductions with a Precision Air-Assisted Sprayer , 2013 .

[15]  Enrique Moltó,et al.  Effect of spray volume of two organophosphate pesticides on coverage and on mortality of California red scale Aonidiella aurantii (Maskell) , 2011 .

[16]  Santosh K. Pitla,et al.  Control system development and response analysis of an electronically actuated variable-orifice nozzle for agricultural pesticide applications. , 2015 .

[17]  C. Sinfort,et al.  Influence of spray characteristics on potential spray drift of field crop sprayers: A literature review , 2014 .

[18]  Heping Zhu,et al.  Techno-economic impacts of using a laser-guided variable-rate spraying system to retrofit conventional constant-rate sprayers , 2020, Precision Agriculture.

[19]  Alvin R. Womac,et al.  Spray Tip Effect on Glufosinate Canopy Deposits in Palmer Amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri ) for Pulse-Width Modulation versus Air-Induction Technologies , 2016 .

[20]  D. K. Giles,et al.  Droplet size and spray pattern characteristics of an electronic flow controller for spray nozzles , 1990 .

[21]  Hui Liu,et al.  Development of a Laser-Guided, Embedded-Computer-Controlled, Air-Assisted Precision Sprayer , 2017 .

[22]  Emilio Gil,et al.  Comparative study of CFD models of the air flow produced by an air-assisted sprayer adapted to the crop geometry , 2017, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[23]  Heping Zhu,et al.  Performance Evaluation of a Newly Developed Variable-Rate Sprayer for Nursery Liner Applications , 2011 .

[24]  Shufeng Han,et al.  MODIFICATION AND TESTING OF A COMMERCIAL SPRAYER WITH PWM SOLENOIDS FOR PRECISION SPRAYING , 2001 .

[25]  John R. Washington,et al.  Relationship between the Spray Droplet Density of Two Protectant Fungicides and the Germination of Mycosphaerella fijiensis Ascospores on Banana Leaf Surfaces , 1997 .

[26]  Olivier Naud,et al.  Dataset of spray deposit distribution in vine canopy for two contrasted performance sprayers during a vegetative cycle associated with crop indicators (LWA and TRV) , 2018, Data in brief.

[27]  Martin J. Bukovac,et al.  Studies on octylphenoxy surfactants: XI. Effect on NAA diffusion through the isolated tomato fruit cuticular membrane , 1993 .

[28]  F. Cioni,et al.  Experimental results with intermitting spray application technique on grapevine, fruit trees and sugar beet diseases. , 2012 .

[29]  Y. C. Bhatt,et al.  Real-Time Variable Rate Spraying in Orchards and Vineyards: A Review , 2018 .

[30]  Marco Bietresato,et al.  Evaluation of a LiDAR-based 3D-stereoscopic vision system for crop-monitoring applications , 2016, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[31]  Chunjiang Zhao,et al.  Design and performance evaluation of a variable-rate orchard sprayer based on a laser-scanning sensor , 2019 .

[32]  Joe D. Luck,et al.  Analyzing the Nozzle Spray Fan Pattern of an Agricultural Sprayer Using Pulse Width Modulation Technology to Generate an On-Ground Coverage Map , 2017 .

[33]  G. M. Richardson,et al.  Spray deposits and losses in different sized apple trees from an axial fan orchard sprayer: 3. Effects of air volumetric flow rate , 2001 .

[34]  H. Jeon,et al.  Original paper: Evaluation of ultrasonic sensor for variable-rate spray applications , 2011 .

[35]  David C. Munthali,et al.  Biological efficiency of small dicofol droplets against Tetranychus urticae (Koch) eggs, larvae and protonymphs , 1984 .

[36]  Hui Liu,et al.  EVALUATION OF A LASER SCANNING SENSOR IN DETECTION OF COMPLEX-SHAPED TARGETS FOR VARIABLE-RATE SPRAYER DEVELOPMENT , 2016 .

[37]  R. D. Fox,et al.  EVALUATION OF SPRAY QUALITY BY OILAND WATER-SENSITIVE PAPERS , 1999 .

[38]  R. C. Derksen,et al.  A HISTORY OF AIR-BLAST SPRAYER DEVELOPMENT AND FUTURE PROSPECTS , 2008 .

[39]  Enrique Moltó,et al.  Comparison between standard and drift reducing nozzles for pesticide application in citrus: Part I. Effects on wind tunnel and field spray drift , 2017 .

[40]  Emilio Gil,et al.  Evaluation of leaf deposit quality between electrostatic and conventional multi-row sprayers in a trellised vineyard , 2020 .

[41]  W. C. Hoffmann,et al.  Evaluation of spray pattern uniformity using three unique analyses as impacted by nozzle, pressure, and pulse-width modulation duty cycle. , 2019, Pest management science.

[42]  Heping Zhu,et al.  Development of Digital Flow Control System for Multi-Channel Variable-Rate Sprayers , 2014 .

[43]  A. Escolà,et al.  Variable rate application of plant protection products in vineyard using ultrasonic sensors , 2007 .

[44]  P. J. Walklate,et al.  An examination of Leaf-Wall-Area dose expression , 2012 .

[45]  C. Sinfort,et al.  Emission of pesticides to the air during sprayer application: A bibliographic review , 2005 .

[46]  Luca Palmeri,et al.  An integrated model-based approach to the risk assessment of pesticide drift from vineyards , 2015 .

[47]  Mário Cunha,et al.  Assessing the ability of image processing software to analyse spray quality on water-sensitive papers used as artificial targets , 2012 .

[48]  Joan Ramón Rosell Polo,et al.  A tractor-mounted scanning LIDAR for the non-destructive measurement of vegetative volume and surface area of tree-row plantations: A comparison with conventional destructive measurements , 2009 .

[49]  Martyn G. Ford,et al.  The Kinetics of Insecticide Action. Part V: Deterministic Models to Simulate the Movement of Pesticide from Discrete Deposits and to Predict Optimum Deposit Characteristics on Leaf Surfaces for Control of Sedentary Crop Pests , 1996 .

[50]  J. C. van de Zande,et al.  A System for Adjusting the Spray Application to the Target Characteristics , 2008 .

[51]  Davide Falchieri.  New Application Method for Reducing Pesticide Rate/ha and Cost in Plant Protection , 2013 .

[52]  Xiongkui He,et al.  Design and experiment of variable rate orchard sprayer based on laser scanning sensor , 2018 .

[53]  Markus Riederer,et al.  Mechanisms of cuticular uptake of xenobiotics into living plants: 1. Influence of xenobiotic dose on the uptake of three model compounds applied in the absence and presence of surfactants into Chenopodium album, Hedera helix and Stephanotis floribunda leaves. , 2004, Pest management science.

[54]  Masoud Salyani,et al.  A portable scanning system for evaluation of spray deposit distribution , 2011 .

[55]  John P. Fulton,et al.  Real-Time Pressure and Flow Dynamics Due to Boom Section and Individual Nozzle Control on Agricultural Sprayers , 2010 .

[56]  Emilio Gil,et al.  Ground Deposition and Airborne Spray Drift Assessment in Vineyard and Orchard: The Influence of Environmental Variables and Sprayer Settings , 2017 .

[57]  Heping Zhu,et al.  Control of Insects and Diseases with Intelligent Variable-rate Sprayers in Ornamental Nurseries1 , 2019, Journal of Environmental Horticulture.

[58]  Michel Kinnaert,et al.  Improvement Of Spray Deposit Homogeneity Using A Pwm Spray Controller To Compensate Horizontal Boom Speed Variations , 2004 .

[59]  W. Siegfried,et al.  Comparison of spray deposits and efficacy against powdery mildew of aerial and ground-based spraying equipment in viticulture , 2003 .

[60]  W. Siegfried,et al.  Dosage of plant protection products adapted to leaf area index in viticulture , 2007 .

[61]  David Nuyttens,et al.  Assessment of orchard sprayers using laboratory experiments and computational fluid dynamics modelling , 2013 .

[62]  Nigel E. A. Scopes,et al.  A technique for studying the biological efficiency of small droplets of pesticide solutions and a consideration of the implications , 1982 .

[63]  Heping Zhu,et al.  Spray Outputs from a Variable-Rate Sprayer Manipulated with PWM Solenoid Valves , 2018 .

[64]  Heping Zhu,et al.  Assessment of Fluorescent Dye Brilliant Sulfaflavine Deposition on Stainless Steel Screens as Spray Droplet Collectors , 2019 .

[65]  A Rodríguez-Lizana,et al.  Assessing the optimal liquid volume to be sprayed on isolated olive trees according to their canopy volumes. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[66]  D. Stajnko,et al.  Interactions between spray drift and sprayer travel speed in two different apple orchard training systems , 2015, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology.

[67]  H. E. Ozkan,et al.  Development of a Variable-Rate Sprayer with Laser Scanning Sensor to Synchronize Spray Outputs to Tree Structures , 2012 .

[68]  Alvin R. Womac,et al.  Spray Tip Configurations with Pulse-Width Modulation for Glufosinate-Ammonium Deposits in Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) , 2017 .

[69]  A. Escolà,et al.  Variable rate dosing in precision viticulture: use of electronic devices to improve application efficiency. , 2010 .

[70]  Enrique Moltó,et al.  Description of the airflow produced by an air-assisted sprayer during pesticide applications to citrus , 2015 .

[71]  Joe D. Luck,et al.  Field application uniformity and accuracy of two rate control systems with automatic section capabilities on agricultural sprayers , 2013, Precision Agriculture.

[72]  Denis Stajnko,et al.  Development of alternative plant protection product application techniques in orchards, based on measurement sensing systems: A review , 2016, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[73]  Jordi Llorens,et al.  Variable rate sprayer. Part 2 - Vineyard prototype: Design, implementation, and validation , 2013 .

[74]  Heping Zhu,et al.  Control of Insect Pests and Diseases in an Ohio Fruit Farm with a Laser-guided Intelligent Sprayer , 2020, HortTechnology.

[75]  I. Jonckheere,et al.  Influence of measurement set-up of ground-based LiDAR for derivation of tree structure , 2006 .

[76]  Semjons Ivanovs,et al.  Impact of forced air flow upon introducing pesticides under conditions of lateral wind , 2018, Research in Agricultural Engineering.

[77]  W. M. Miller,et al.  Investigation of Laser and Ultrasonic Ranging Sensors for Measurements of Citrus Canopy Volume , 2002 .

[78]  Alexandre Escolà,et al.  Real-Time Tree-Foliage Surface Estimation Using a Ground Laser Scanner , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[79]  Masoud Salyani,et al.  SPRAY DEPOSITION AND MASS BALANCE IN CITRUS ORCHARD APPLICATIONS , 2007 .

[80]  A. Escolà,et al.  An Electronic Control System for Pesticide Application Proportional to the Canopy Width of Tree Crops , 2006 .

[81]  J. Rosell,et al.  Sensitivity of tree volume measurement to trajectory errors from a terrestrial LIDAR scanner. , 2010 .