Miniature bioreactors: current practices and future opportunities

This review focuses on the emerging field of miniature bioreactors (MBRs), and examines the way in which they are used to speed up many areas of bioprocessing. MBRs aim to achieve this acceleration as a result of their inherent high-throughput capability, which results from their ability to perform many cell cultivations in parallel. There are several applications for MBRs, ranging from media development and strain improvement to process optimisation. The potential of MBRs for use in these applications will be explained in detail in this review. MBRs are currently based on several existing bioreactor platforms such as shaken devices, stirred-tank reactors and bubble columns. This review will present the advantages and disadvantages of each design together with an appraisal of prototype and commercialised devices developed for parallel operation. Finally we will discuss how MBRs can be used in conjunction with automated robotic systems and other miniature process units to deliver a fully-integrated, high-throughput (HT) solution for cell cultivation process development.

[1]  J. Büchs,et al.  Mass transfer resistance of sterile plugs in shaking bioreactors. , 2001, Biochemical engineering journal.

[2]  Gary J. Lye,et al.  Basic Biotechnology: High-throughput screening and process optimisation , 2006 .

[3]  Philippe Girard,et al.  TubeSpin satellites: a fast track approach for process development with animal cells using shaking technology , 2004 .

[4]  Frank Kensy,et al.  Oxygen transfer phenomena in 48-well microtiter plates: determination by optical monitoring of sulfite oxidation and verification by real-time measurement during microbial growth. , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[5]  Yordan Kostov,et al.  Bioprocess monitoring. , 2002, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[6]  Yordan Kostov,et al.  Design and performance of a 24‐station high throughput microbioreactor , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[7]  S E Vecht-Lifshitz,et al.  Pellet formation and cellular aggregation in Streptomyces tendae , 1990, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[8]  M. Micheletti,et al.  Microscale process evaluation of recombinant biocatalyst libraries: application to Baeyer–Villiger monooxygenase catalysed lactone synthesis , 2005, Bioprocess and biosystems engineering.

[9]  Robert Hermann,et al.  Methods for Intense Aeration, Growth, Storage, and Replication of Bacterial Strains in Microtiter Plates , 2000, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[10]  B Allen,et al.  Design of a prototype miniature bioreactor for high throughput automated bioprocessing , 2003 .

[11]  Steven D. Doig,et al.  Characterisation of a novel miniaturised bubble column bioreactor for high throughput cell cultivation , 2005 .

[12]  Ingo Klimant,et al.  Integrated optical sensing of dissolved oxygen in microtiter plates: A novel tool for microbial cultivation , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[13]  M. Manocchia,et al.  The First Biopharmaceuticals Approved in the United States: 1980-1994 , 1996 .

[14]  Jay D Keasling,et al.  Microbioreactor arrays with parametric control for high‐throughput experimentation , 2004, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[15]  C. Thomas,et al.  Inoculum effects on fungal morphology: Shake flasks vs agitated bioreactors , 1994 .

[16]  Dirk Weuster-Botz,et al.  Methods and milliliter scale devices for high-throughput bioprocess design , 2005, Bioprocess and biosystems engineering.

[17]  Frank Baganz,et al.  Characterization of Oxygen Transfer in Miniature and Lab‐Scale Bubble Column Bioreactors and Comparison of Microbial Growth Performance Based on Constant kLa , 2008, Biotechnology progress.

[18]  Hideo Tanaka,et al.  Development of a novel box-shaped shake flask with efficient gas exchange capacity , 1998 .

[19]  Uwe Dingerdissen,et al.  Rapid Evaluation of Oxygen and Water Permeation through Microplate Sealing Tapes , 2003, Biotechnology progress.

[20]  J. Büchs,et al.  Device for sterile online measurement of the oxygen transfer rate in shaking flasks. , 2001, Biochemical engineering journal.

[21]  John M. Ward,et al.  A novel method for the measurement of oxygen mass transfer rates in small-scale vessels , 2005 .

[22]  Jochen Büchs,et al.  A Novel Parallel Shaken Bioreactor System for Continuous Operation , 2004, Biotechnology progress.

[23]  S. Lee,et al.  High cell-density culture of Escherichia coli. , 1996, Trends in biotechnology.

[24]  Gary J. Lye,et al.  Modelling surface aeration rates in shaken microtitre plates using dimensionless groups , 2005 .

[25]  Klavs F. Jensen,et al.  Gene expression analysis of Escherichia coli grown in miniaturized bioreactor platforms for high-throughput analysis of growth and genomic data , 2005, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[26]  D. Kirwan,et al.  Effects of stirring and sparging on cultured hybridoma cells , 1990, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[27]  W. Bentley,et al.  Green fluorescent protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: real-time studies of the GAL1 promoter. , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[28]  Yordan Kostov,et al.  Dual Excitation Ratiometric Fluorescent pH Sensor for Noninvasive Bioprocess Monitoring: Development and Application , 2002, Biotechnology progress.

[29]  Christoph Wittmann,et al.  Characterization and application of an optical sensor for quantification of dissolved O2 in shake-flasks , 2003, Biotechnology Letters.

[30]  G. Rao,et al.  Ratiometric oxygen sensing: detection of dual-emission ratio through a single emission filter. , 2000, The Analyst.

[31]  Daniel I. C. Wang,et al.  Effects of paddle impeller geometry on power input and mass transfer in small‐scale animal cell culture vessels , 1989, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[32]  Peter J. Coassin,et al.  Miniaturized FRET assays and microfluidics: key components for ultra-high-throughput screening. , 1999, Drug discovery today.

[33]  D Weuster-Botz,et al.  Development, parallelization, and automation of a gas-inducing milliliter-scale bioreactor for high-throughput bioprocess design (HTBD). , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[34]  Gary J. Lye,et al.  An automated microscale technique for the quantitative and parallel analysis of microfiltration operations , 2006 .

[35]  Amit Varma,et al.  Production of monoclonal antibody using free‐suspended and immobilized hybridoma cells: Effect of serum , 1991, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[36]  F. Wurm,et al.  Small-scale bioreactor system for process development and optimization. , 2001, Biochemical engineering journal.

[37]  J. Büchs,et al.  Characterization of gas-liquid mass transfer phenomena in microtiter plates. , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[38]  A. Pavlou,et al.  Recombinant protein therapeutics—success rates, market trends and values to 2010 , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[39]  F. Wurm,et al.  Transfecting mammalian cells: optimization of critical parameters affecting calcium-phosphate precipitate formation. , 1996, Nucleic acids research.

[40]  Dirk Weuster-Botz,et al.  Methods and milliliter scale devices for high-throughput bioprocess design , 2005, Bioprocess and biosystems engineering.

[41]  G. Rao,et al.  A study of oxygen transfer in shake flasks using a non‐invasive oxygen sensor , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[42]  Nicolas Szita,et al.  Development of a multiplexed microbioreactor system for high-throughput bioprocessing. , 2005, Lab on a chip.

[43]  J Büchs,et al.  Introduction to advantages and problems of shaken cultures. , 2001, Biochemical engineering journal.

[44]  Gary J. Lye,et al.  pH control in microwell fermentations of S. erythraea CA340: influence on biomass growth kinetics and erythromycin biosynthesis , 2003 .

[45]  Jonathan I. Betts,et al.  Characterization and Application of a Miniature 10 mL Stirred‐Tank Bioreactor, Showing Scale‐Down Equivalence with a Conventional 7 L Reactor , 2006, Biotechnology progress.

[46]  Dirk Weuster-Botz,et al.  Parallel reactor systems for bioprocess development. , 2005, Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology.

[47]  B. Junker.  Scale-up methodologies for Escherichia coli and yeast fermentation processes. , 2004, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[48]  J G Houston,et al.  The chemical-biological interface: developments in automated and miniaturised screening technology. , 1997, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[49]  Nicolas Szita,et al.  A well‐mixed, polymer‐based microbioreactor with integrated optical measurements , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[50]  James E. Bailey,et al.  Streptomycetes in micro-cultures: Growth, production of secondary metabolites, and storage and retrieval in the 96–well format , 2000, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[51]  D. Weuster‐Botz,et al.  Process-engineering characterization of small-scale bubble columns for microbial process development , 2001 .

[52]  Xudong Ge,et al.  Validation of an optical sensor-based high-throughput bioreactor system for mammalian cell culture. , 2006, Journal of biotechnology.

[53]  A. P. Ison,et al.  Turbulent breakage of filamentous bacteria in mechanically agitated batch culture , 2000 .

[54]  John M Woodley,et al.  Accelerated design of bioconversion processes using automated microscale processing techniques. , 2003, Trends in biotechnology.

[55]  Mark R. Marten,et al.  Optical analysis of liquid mixing in a minibioreactor , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[56]  Sang Yup Lee,et al.  Systems biotechnology for strain improvement. , 2005, Trends in biotechnology.

[57]  Dirk Weuster-Botz,et al.  Parallel Bubble Columns with Fed‐Batch Technique for Microbial Process Development on a Small Scale , 1999 .

[58]  M. Bushell,et al.  Effect of small scale culture vessel type on hyphal fragment size and erythromycin production in Saccharopolyspora erythraea , 1997, Biotechnology Letters.

[59]  Alvin W. Nienow,et al.  The dependency on scale of power numbers of Rushton disc turbines , 1987 .

[60]  Fahir Borak,et al.  Bubble column reactors , 2005 .

[61]  J. Büchs,et al.  Characterisation of the gas-liquid mass transfer in shaking bioreactors. , 2001, Biochemical engineering journal.

[62]  Arthur E. Humphrey,et al.  Shake Flask to Fermentor: What Have We Learned? , 1998 .

[63]  Ingo Klimant,et al.  Modeling of Mixing in 96‐Well Microplates Observed with Fluorescence Indicators , 2002, Biotechnology progress.

[64]  Nicolas Szita,et al.  Membrane‐aerated microbioreactor for high‐throughput bioprocessing , 2004, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[65]  Nigel J. Titchener-Hooker,et al.  Evaluation of a pH-stat feeding strategy on the production and recovery of Fab’ fragments from E. coli , 2005 .

[66]  John M. Woodley,et al.  Fluid mixing in shaken bioreactors: Implications for scale-up predictions from microlitre-scale microbial and mammalian cell cultures , 2006 .