Internal models of limb geometry in the control of hand compliance

The aim of this article is to describe the role of some neural mechanisms in the adaptive control of limb compliance during preplanned mechanical interaction with objects. We studied the EMG responses and the kinematic responses evoked by pseudorandom perturbations continuously applied by means of a torque motor before and during a catching task. The temporal changes of these responses were studied by means of an identification technique for time-varying systems. We found a transient reversal of EMG stretch reflex responses centered on the time of ball impact on the hand; this reversal results in a transient coactivation of antagonist muscles at both the elbow and the wrist. The kinematic responses describe the relation between torque input and position output. Thus, they provide a global measure of limb compliance. The changes in limb compliance during catching were quantified by computing error criteria either in the Cartesian coordinates of the hand or in the angular coordinates of the elbow and wrist joints. We found that only the hand compliance in Cartesian coordinates is consistently minimized around impact, in coincidence with the transient reversal of the stretch reflex responses. By contrast, the error criteria expressed in the angular coordinates of the joints have a variable time course and are not minimized around impact. It is known that hand compliance depends on both the pattern of muscle activities and the geometrical configuration of the limb. Therefore, the lack of consistent correlation between the changes in hand compliance and the changes in the geometrical configuration of the limb during catching indicates that the gating of the stretch reflex responses around impact time is based on an internal model of limb geometry.

[1]  J MEAD,et al.  Mechanical properties of lungs. , 1961, Physiological reviews.

[2]  H T Whiting,et al.  Exposure and occluded duration effects in a ball-catching skill. , 1974, Journal of motor behavior.

[3]  G. Agarwal,et al.  Compliance of the Human Ankle Joint , 1977 .

[4]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Electromyographic response to pseudo-random torque disturbances of human forearm position , 1978, Neuroscience.

[5]  J C Houk,et al.  Regulation of stiffness by skeletomotor reflexes. , 1979, Annual review of physiology.

[6]  Gurfinkel' Vs,et al.  Sensory complexes and sensomotor integration. , 1979 .

[7]  V S Gurfinkel',et al.  Sensory complexes and sensomotor integration. , 1979, Human Physiology.

[8]  O. I. Fukson,et al.  The spinal frog takes into account the scheme of its body during the wiping reflex. , 1980, Science.

[9]  A. G. Feldman Superposition of motor programs—I. Rhythmic forearm movements in man , 1980, Neuroscience.

[10]  C. Marsden,et al.  A grab reflex in the human hand. , 1980, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  F Lacquaniti,et al.  Time-varying properties of myotatic response in man during some simple motor tasks. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  J. T. Massey,et al.  Spatial trajectories and reaction times of aimed movements: effects of practice, uncertainty, and change in target location. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  Perceptual Structures and Distributed Motor Control , 1981 .

[14]  I. Hunter,et al.  Dynamics of human ankle stiffness: variation with mean ankle torque. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Some factors pertinent to the organization and control of arm movements , 1982, Brain Research.

[16]  Richard B. Stein,et al.  What muscle variable(s) does the nervous system control in limb movements? , 1982, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Mechanical properties of muscles: Implications for motor control , 1982, Trends in Neurosciences.

[18]  H. Dr,et al.  Separate cortical systems for control of joint movement and joint stiffness: reciprocal activation and coactivation of antagonist muscles. , 1983 .

[19]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Changes in mechanical impedance and gain of the myotatic response during transitions between two motor tasks , 1983 .

[20]  K. Akazawa,et al.  Modulation of reflex EMG and stiffness in response to stretch of human finger muscle. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  G L Gottlieb,et al.  Mathematical modeling and simulation of the postural control loop. Part III. , 1984, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[22]  N. Hogan Adaptive control of mechanical impedance by coactivation of antagonist muscles , 1984 .

[23]  J. Abbs,et al.  Control of complex motor gestures: orofacial muscle responses to load perturbations of lip during speech. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[25]  A. Georgopoulos On reaching. , 1986, Annual review of neuroscience.

[26]  J. Sanes,et al.  Kinematics and end-point control of arm movements are modified by unexpected changes in viscous loading , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Anticipatory and reflex coactivation of antagonist muscles in catching , 1987, Brain Research.

[28]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Effect of load perturbations on EMG activity and trajectories of pointing movements , 1988, Brain Research.

[29]  A P Georgopoulos,et al.  Spatial coding of visually guided arm movements in primate motor cortex. , 1988, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[30]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of the electromyographic responses to multidirectional load perturbations of the human arm. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Grip force adjustments evoked by load force perturbations of a grasped object. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  C. Capaday,et al.  The trajectory of human wrist movements. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  G. Loeb,et al.  Spinal cord circuits: are they mirrors of musculoskeletal mechanics? , 1989, Journal of motor behavior.

[34]  F. Lacquaniti Central representations of human limb movement as revealed by studies of drawing and handwriting , 1989, Trends in Neurosciences.

[35]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  The role of preparation in tuning anticipatory and reflex responses during catching , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[36]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Errors in pointing are due to approximations in sensorimotor transformations. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Adaptation to suppression of visual information during catching , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[38]  Karl Johan Åström,et al.  Adaptive Control , 1989, Embedded Digital Control with Microcontrollers.

[39]  C. Atkeson,et al.  Learning arm kinematics and dynamics. , 1989, Annual review of neuroscience.

[40]  C Ghez,et al.  Roles of proprioceptive input in the programming of arm trajectories. , 1990, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[41]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Computations underlying the execution of movement: a biological perspective. , 1991, Science.

[42]  N. A. Borghese,et al.  Transient reversal of the stretch reflex in human arm muscles. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.