Molecular Docking and High-Throughput Screening for Novel Inhibitors of Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase-1 B

High-throughput screening (HTS) of compound libraries is used to discover novel leads for drug development. When a structure is available for the target, computer-based screening using molecular docking may also be considered. The two techniques have rarely been used together on the same target. The opportunity to do so presented itself in a project to discover novel inhibitors for the enzyme protein tyrosine phosphatase-1B (PTP1B), a tyrosine phosphatase that has been implicated as a key target for type II diabetes. A corporate library of approximately 400 000 compounds was screened using high-throughput experimental techniques for compounds that inhibited PTP1B. Concurrently, molecular docking was used to screen approximately 235 000 commercially available compounds against the X-ray crystallographic structure of PTP1B, and 365 high-scoring molecules were tested as inhibitors of the enzyme. Of approximately 400 000 molecules tested in the high-throughput experimental assay, 85 (0.021%) inhibited the enzyme with IC50 values less than 100 μM; the most active had an IC50 value of 4.2 μM. Of the 365 molecules suggested by molecular docking, 127 (34.8%) inhibited PTP1B with IC50 values less than 100 μM; the most active of these had an IC50 of 1.7 μM. Structure-based docking therefore enriched the hit rate by 1700-fold over random screening. The hits from both the high-throughput and docking screens were dissimilar from phosphotyrosine, the canonical substrate group for PTP1B; the two hit lists were also very different from each other. Surprisingly, the docking hits were judged to be more druglike than the HTS hits. The diversity of both hit lists and their dissimilarity from each other suggest that docking and HTS may be complementary techniques for lead discovery.

[1]  S. Haggarty,et al.  Dissecting cellular processes using small molecules: identification of colchicine-like, taxol-like and other small molecules that perturb mitosis. , 2000, Chemistry & biology.

[2]  R. Rando,et al.  A high-throughput fluorescence screen to monitor the specific binding of antagonists to RNA targets. , 1998, Analytical biochemistry.

[3]  J H Zhang,et al.  Confirmation of primary active substances from high throughput screening of chemical and biological populations: a statistical approach and practical considerations. , 2000, Journal of combinatorial chemistry.

[4]  Brian K. Shoichet,et al.  Molecular docking using shape descriptors , 1992 .

[5]  C. Moxham,et al.  PTP1B inhibition and antihyperglycemic activity in the ob/ob mouse model of novel 11-arylbenzo[b]naphtho[2,3-d]furans and 11-arylbenzo[b]naphtho[2,3-d]thiophenes. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[6]  M Rarey,et al.  Detailed analysis of scoring functions for virtual screening. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[7]  Y. Keng,et al.  Structure-based discovery of small molecule inhibitors targeted to protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[8]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Structure-based discovery of inhibitors of thymidylate synthase. , 1993, Science.

[9]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Characterization and kinetic analysis of the intracellular domain of human protein tyrosine phosphatase beta (HPTP beta) using synthetic phosphopeptides. , 1994, The Biochemical journal.

[10]  J. Proudfoot,et al.  Ligands for the tyrosine kinase p56lck SH2 domain: discovery of potent dipeptide derivatives with monocharged, nonhydrolyzable phosphate replacements. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[11]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Computational methods for biomolecular docking. , 1996, Current opinion in structural biology.

[12]  B. Kennedy,et al.  Increased insulin sensitivity and obesity resistance in mice lacking the protein tyrosine phosphatase-1B gene. , 1999, Science.

[13]  B. Ozenberger,et al.  Identification of a calcium channel modulator using a high throughput yeast two-hybrid screen , 1998, Nature Biotechnology.

[14]  D. Rognan,et al.  Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[15]  Alexander A. Rashin,et al.  Hydration phenomena, classical electrostatics, and the boundary element method , 1990 .

[16]  G. Ferry,et al.  High-Capacity Screening of Arylalkylamine N-Acetyltransferase Inhibitors using a High-Performance Liquid Chromatography System , 2000, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[17]  M. Murcko,et al.  Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[18]  D. Lawrence,et al.  Potent and highly selective inhibitors of the protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[19]  A. Pope,et al.  A Homogenous 384-Well High Throughput Screen for Novel Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor: Ligand Interactions Using Time Resolved Energy Transfer , 1999, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[20]  J. Tainer,et al.  Screening a peptidyl database for potential ligands to proteins with side‐chain flexibility , 1998, Proteins.

[21]  R M Knegtel,et al.  Efficacy and selectivity in flexible database docking , 1999, Proteins.

[22]  Daniel A. Gschwend,et al.  Orientational sampling and rigid-body minimization in molecular docking revisited: On-the-fly optimization and degeneracy removal , 1996, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[23]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Automated docking with grid‐based energy evaluation , 1992 .

[24]  Thompson N. Doman,et al.  Algorithm5: A Technique for Fuzzy Similarity Clustering of Chemical Inventories , 1996, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[25]  P. Focia,et al.  Efficient identification of inhibitors targeting the closed active site conformation of the HPRT from Trypanosoma cruzi. , 2000, Chemistry & biology.

[26]  J M Blaney,et al.  A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  B. Shoichet,et al.  Flexible ligand docking using conformational ensembles , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[28]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Structure-Based Molecular Design , 1994 .

[29]  J. Dixon,et al.  Roles of aspartic acid-181 and serine-222 in intermediate formation and hydrolysis of the mammalian protein-tyrosine-phosphatase PTP1. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[30]  Zhon-Yin Zhang,et al.  Protein–tyrosine phosphatases: Structure, mechanism, and inhibitor discovery , 1998, Biopolymers.

[31]  G. Klebe,et al.  Statistical potentials and scoring functions applied to protein-ligand binding. , 2001, Current opinion in structural biology.

[32]  M Webb,et al.  Ultra-High Throughput Screen of Two-Million-Member Combinatorial Compound Collection in a Miniaturized, 1536-Well Assay Format , 2000, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[33]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  Distributed automated docking of flexible ligands to proteins: Parallel applications of AutoDock 2.4 , 1996, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[34]  D S Lawrence,et al.  Identification of a second aryl phosphate-binding site in protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B: a paradigm for inhibitor design. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  A J Olson,et al.  Automated docking and the search for HIV protease inhibitors. , 1998, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[36]  B. Honig,et al.  Calculation of electrostatic potentials in an enzyme active site , 1987, Nature.

[37]  New Azolidinediones as Inhibitors of Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase 1B with Antihyperglycemic Properties. , 2000 .

[38]  P Willett,et al.  Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Ligand solvation in molecular docking , 1999, Proteins.

[40]  R Nussinov,et al.  Efficient computational algorithms for docking and for generating and matching a library of functional epitopes II. Computer vision-based techniques for the generation and utilization of functional epitopes. , 1999, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.

[41]  B. Matthews,et al.  Docking molecules by families to increase the diversity of hits in database screens: Computational strategy and experimental evaluation , 2001, Proteins.

[42]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Matching chemistry and shape in molecular docking. , 1993, Protein engineering.

[43]  L. Iversen,et al.  Protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) as drug targets: inhibitors of PTP-1B for the treatment of diabetes. , 2000, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[44]  F. Lombardo,et al.  Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. , 2001, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[45]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  The MIDAS display system , 1988 .

[46]  Daniel A. Gschwend,et al.  Molecular docking towards drug discovery , 1996, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[47]  X Y Wang,et al.  Small molecule peptidomimetics containing a novel phosphotyrosine bioisostere inhibit protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B and augment insulin action. , 2001, Biochemistry.