Breeding for low body weight in Goettingen minipigs.

The Goettingen minipig is a laboratory animal with increasing popularity in medical research. To get a genetically smaller minipig, a new breeding scheme with a focus on weight reduction has to be developed. Therefore, 19 505 body weight measurements of 3461 Goettingen minipigs were analysed with multiple trait models and random regression models (RRM) for the estimation of genetic parameters. Heritabilities were moderate with slightly higher values estimated with the RRM. Genetic correlations between body weight measurements at different ages were decreasing with increasing time lag between the measurements. An operational breeding goal for relative weight reduction RWR is suggested in which the weight reduction in each age class is expressed as per cent of the actual body weight and is weighted according to the proportion of animals sold in this age class. Expected genetic progress was calculated for two different selection ages (80 and 150 days). Selection at age 150 days leads to an expected genetic progress of 3.9 % RWR per year. And it is shown how the selection for RWR will modify the shape of the growth curve. On the basis of these results, a new breeding scheme with a focus on weight reduction can be implemented, which also has to account for correlated undesirable effects, like decline of fertility and increased rate of inbreeding.

[1]  W. Holtz Pigs and Minipigs , 2010 .

[2]  H. Simianer,et al.  Estimation of genetic parameters for body weight of the Goettingen minipig with random regression models. , 2007, Journal of animal science.

[3]  K. Meyer,et al.  Estimates of genetic covariance functions for growth of Angus cattle. , 2005, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[4]  Rainer Roehe,et al.  Comparison of linear and nonlinear functions and covariance structures to estimate feed intake pattern in growing pigs , 2003 .

[5]  J. K. Bertrand,et al.  Analyses of growth curves of nellore cattle by multiple-trait and random regression models. , 2003, Journal of animal science.

[6]  R. Veerkamp,et al.  Genetic parameters for various random regression models to describe the weight data of pigs. , 2002, Journal of Animal Science.

[7]  S. Brotherstone,et al.  A genetic evaluation of growth in sheep using random regression techniques , 2002 .

[8]  K. Meyer,et al.  Estimates of covariance functions for growth from birth to 630 days of age in Nelore cattle. , 2001, Journal of animal science.

[9]  T. Meuwissen Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[10]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Estimation of genetic and phenotypic covariance functions for longitudinal or ‘repeated’ records by restricted maximum likelihood , 1997 .

[11]  K. M. Irvin,et al.  Genetic, phenotypic and environmental relationships between sow body weight and sow productivity traits. , 1985, Journal of animal science.

[12]  David A. Belsley,et al.  Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity , 1980 .

[13]  Alan Robertson,et al.  Inbreeding in artificial selection programmes. , 1961, Genetical research.

[14]  O. Kempthorne,et al.  Restricted Selection Indices , 1959 .

[15]  G. Cummings The Care and Management of Laboratory Animals , 1948 .

[16]  J. Lush,et al.  THE EFFICIENCY OF THREE METHODS OF SELECTION , 1942 .

[17]  H. Simianer,et al.  Modeling the growth of the Goettingen minipig. , 2007, Journal of animal science.

[18]  L. A. García-Cortés,et al.  VCE-5, a package for the estimation of dispersion parameters. , 2002 .

[19]  J. Jamrozik,et al.  BAYESIAN COMPARISON OF RANDOM REGRESSION MODELS FOR TEST-DAY YIELDS IN DAIRY CATTLE , 2002 .