It investment and complements in value creation: meta-analytic replication

We execute four theoretically motivated replications of earlier analyses on business value of information technology (IT). We classify firm level IT value research and select alternative studies to understand and the core logics of current research and its sensitivity to used measures. Simultaneous replication of several models enables generalization across a variety of constructs, and abstracts their findings as is commonly done through meta-analyses. An access to a common dataset and availability of well matched analogs allow execution of these replications. Our results show robustness of some constructs across studies in predicting aspects of IT value. The models also offer theoretical insights of plausible interactions between the technology artifact, organizational characteristics and productivity outcomes. These results are preliminary due to a limited dataset, which was not customized to the proposed replications. Extensions to current theories are suggested which would enable better explanation and prediction.

[1]  Maryellen R. Kelley,et al.  Productivity and Information Technology: The Elusive Connection , 1994 .

[2]  Jay Brand,et al.  File Drawer Problem , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[3]  Leon A. Kappelman,et al.  Cautions on the Use of the SERVQUAL Measure to Assess the Quality of Information Systems Services , 1999 .

[4]  P. Harker,et al.  Examining the Contribution of Information Technology Toward Productivity and Profitability in U.S. Retail Banking , 1997 .

[5]  Daniel E. Vetter,et al.  Replications in the Finance Literature: An Empirical Study , 1991 .

[6]  Charles H. Kriebel,et al.  Information Technologies and Business Value: An Analytic and Empirical Investigation , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  BaruaAnitesh,et al.  Information Technologies and Business Value , 1995 .

[8]  Chiara Francalanci,et al.  Information Technology and Worker Composition: Determinants of Productivity in the Life Insurance Industry , 1998, MIS Q..

[9]  Arun Rai,et al.  Technology investment and business performance , 1997, CACM.

[10]  J. Armstrong,et al.  Replications and Extensions in Marketing - Rarely Published But Quite Contrary , 1994 .

[11]  T. E. Marshall,et al.  Relating information technology investment to organizational performance: a causal model analysis , 1997 .

[12]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  Global Measures of Information Service Quality: A Cross‐National Study , 1995 .

[13]  Sandra E. Black,et al.  How to Compete: The Impact of Workplace Practices and Information Technology on Productivity , 1997, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[14]  A. Adam Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[15]  Chung-ki Min,et al.  The substitution of information technology for other factors of production: a Firm Level Analysis , 1997 .

[16]  A. Ehrenberg,et al.  The Design of Replicated Studies , 1993 .

[17]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Measuring Information Technology Payoff: A Meta - Analysis of Structural Variables in Firm - Level Empirical Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Is Information Systems Spending Productive? New Evidence and New Results , 1993, ICIS.

[19]  Sunder Kekre,et al.  Business Value of Information Technology: A Study of Electronic Data Interchange , 1995, MIS Q..

[20]  F. Lichtenberg The Output Contributions of Computer Equipment and Personnel: A Firm- Level Analysis , 1993 .

[21]  Peter Weill,et al.  The Relationship Between Investment in Information Technology and Firm Performance: A Study of the Valve Manufacturing Sector , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  D. Eden Replication, Meta-Analysis, Scientific Progress, and AMJ's Publication Policy , 2002 .

[23]  R. Rosenthal The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results , 1979 .

[24]  Daniel E. Vetter,et al.  Replication in strategic management: scientific testing for validity, generalizability, and usefulness , 1998 .