Modeling the Formation of Dyadic Relationships between Consumers in Online Communities

Members of online communities access consumption related information posted by several other members. Over time, members are influenced by some members of the community, and develop informal relationships with them. We propose a model for the timing of the establishment of relationships between two community members. We explicitly model the salient properties of dyadic data (data on the timing of relationships formed between a pair of community members) arising due to their inherent interdependence: the correlation between the dyadic observations due to reciprocity, the correlation between sender and receiver specific observations due to the "duality" of roles of each member, and the interaction of the latent characteristics of dyad members due to "homophily". The proposed model outperforms benchmark models in terms of in sample fit and predictive power. Moreover, ignoring the properties of dyadic data leads to biased inferences about the effects of covariates. We explore the factors that influence relationship formation between community members who post product reviews in an existing online community. The amount and valence of the information that the dyad members share, the similarity between the information that they post and their network characteristics affect relationship formation. We demonstrate how the model can be applied to improve the targeting effectiveness of marketing campaigns through agents in online communities.

[1]  John Hagel,et al.  The real value of on-line communities , 1999 .

[2]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs andp , 1996 .

[3]  A. A. Mitchell,et al.  The Assessment of Alternative Measures of Consumer Expertise , 1996 .

[4]  Dina Mayzlin,et al.  Promotional Chat on the Internet , 2006 .

[5]  K. Tepper,et al.  The Role of Labeling Processes in Elderly Consumers' Responses to Age Segmentation Cues , 1994 .

[6]  Wagner A. Kamakura,et al.  Identifying Innovators for the Cross-Selling of New Products , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[7]  Robert M. Schindler,et al.  Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information , 2001 .

[8]  R. Mizerski.  An Attribution Explanation of the Disproportionate Influence of Unfavorable Information , 1982 .

[9]  Greg M. Allenby,et al.  Modeling Interdependent Consumer Preferences , 2003 .

[10]  E. Fehr,et al.  Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity , 2000, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[11]  Pradeep K. Chintagunta,et al.  Inertia and Variety Seeking in a Model of Brand-Purchase Timing , 1998 .

[12]  D.,et al.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 2022 .

[13]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  A Social Influence Model of Consumer Participation in Network- and Small-Group-Based Virtual Communities , 2004 .

[14]  Ann E. Schlosser.  Posting versus Lurking: Communicating in a Multiple Audience Context , 2005 .

[15]  David Godes,et al.  Using Online Conversations to Study Word-of-Mouth Communication , 2004 .

[16]  Peter D. Hoff,et al.  Bilinear Mixed-Effects Models for Dyadic Data , 2005 .

[17]  Jonathan K. Frenzen,et al.  Purchasing Behavior in Embedded Markets , 1990 .

[18]  M. Gilly,et al.  A dyadic study of interpersonal information search , 1998 .

[19]  S. Berg.  Snowball Sampling—I , 2006 .

[20]  D. Iacobucci,et al.  Modeling Dyadic Interactions and Networks in Marketing , 1992 .

[21]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: II. Multivariate relations. , 1999, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[22]  M. Brucks.  The Effects of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior , 1985 .

[23]  P. Henry,et al.  Social Class, Market Situation, and Consumers’ Metaphors of (Dis)Empowerment , 2005 .

[24]  Joyce E. Berg,et al.  Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History , 1995 .

[25]  Michelle Renee Nelson,et al.  Message order effects and gender differences in advertising persuasion , 2003, Journal of Advertising Research.

[26]  M. Hallinan,et al.  Sex differences in children's friendships. , 1978, American sociological review.

[27]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Reciprocity of interpersonal attraction: A confirmed hypothesis. , 1982 .

[28]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[29]  Dwayne D. Gremler,et al.  Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? , 2004 .

[30]  Pradeep K. Chintagunta,et al.  The Proportional Hazard Model for Purchase Timing , 2003 .

[31]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[32]  H. Bansal,et al.  Word-of-Mouth Processes within a Services Purchase Decision Context , 2000 .

[33]  J. Heckman,et al.  Econometric duration analysis , 1984 .

[34]  Peter H. Reingen,et al.  Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior , 1987 .

[35]  H. Ibarra.  Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. , 1992 .

[36]  Sha Yang,et al.  Estimating the Interdependence of Television Program Viewership Between Spouses: A Bayesian Simultaneous Equation Model , 2006 .

[37]  Adrian F. M. Smith,et al.  Sampling-Based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities , 1990 .

[38]  M. Newton.  Approximate Bayesian-inference With the Weighted Likelihood Bootstrap , 1994 .

[39]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Validating the Relationship Qualities of Influence and Persuasion With the Family Social Relations Model , 2003 .

[40]  David Godes,et al.  Firm-Created Word-of-Mouth Communication: A Field-Based Quasi-Experiment , 2004 .

[41]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Splitting the reciprocity correlation. , 1980 .

[42]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  Strategic Manipulation of Internet Opinion Forums: Implications for Consumers and Firms , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[43]  Rajiv K. Sinha,et al.  A Split Hazard Model for Analyzing the Diffusion of Innovations , 1992 .

[44]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas.  The Digitization of Word-of-Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Reputation Systems , 2001 .

[45]  Andrea Bonaccorsi,et al.  Entry Strategies Under Competing Standards: Hybrid Business Models in the Open Source Software Industry , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[46]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: III. Valued relations , 1999 .

[47]  K. Michael Haywood,et al.  Managing Word of Mouth Communications , 1989 .