Meeting privacy challenges while advancing intelligent transportation systems

Abstract As transportation engineers and practitioners continue to advance the scope and breadth of intelligent transportation systems (ITS) applications, privacy is a primary concern of transportation agencies in the United States (US) when tracking people, vehicles and goods within the nation’s transportation grid. As a number of technologies have rapidly advanced, including photo enforcement, electronic tolling, vehicle-mile taxing, weigh-in-motion, and Connected Vehicle technologies, research examining the privacy implications of system applications has lagged. In a recent national survey to determine how state departments of transportation (DOTs) are meeting the privacy needs of the traveling public, it was determined that DOTs favor aggregating and masking data for protecting privacy of motorists while collecting travel times and speeds. For capturing video surveillance, abiding by legislation or agency policies was the preferred method of protecting privacy. Unfortunately, there are no national standards in the US for the privacy protection of travelers as most privacy information merely takes the form of poorly defined precepts. With the increasing use of ITS applications, which are becoming more interwoven into the US transportation grid, there is a need to develop a national policy and related standards to ensure the privacy protection of the traveling public to ensure broader acceptance of ITS applications. The findings presented in this paper aim to provide direction on how to address the current and future privacy challenges that face the transportation industry.

[1]  Matthew Kanafani,et al.  California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways (PATH) , 1999 .

[2]  Rong Zhang,et al.  RFID Applications in Transportation Operation and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) , 2009 .

[3]  Caitlin D Cottrill,et al.  Approaches to Privacy Preservation in Intelligent Transportation Systems and Vehicle–Infrastructure Integration Initiative , 2009 .

[4]  Allan F. Williams,et al.  PUBLIC OPINION REGARDING RED LIGHT CAMERAS AND THE PERCEIVED RISK OF BEING TICKETED , 2000 .

[5]  James M Whitty,et al.  Oregon's Mileage Fee Concept and Road User Fee Pilot Program. Report to the 73rd Oregon Legislative Assembly , 2005 .

[6]  Dawn Royal,et al.  NATIONAL SURVEY OF SPEEDING, UNSAFE, DISTRACTED AND DROWSY DRIVING ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOR, 2002. VOLUME III, METHODS , 2003 .

[7]  C Michael Walton,et al.  State Commercial Vehicle Security Enforcement: Operations, Technologies, and Barriers , 2010 .

[8]  Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris,et al.  Designing and Operating Safe and Secure Transit Systems: Assessing Current Practices in the United States and Abroad, MTI Report 04-05 , 2005 .

[9]  James Witty,et al.  Oregon’s Mileage Fee Concept and Road User Fee Pilot Program , 2006 .

[10]  T. Litman London Congestion Pricing – Implications for Other Cities , 2005 .

[11]  Daniel C Murray,et al.  CVISN Business Case (Commercial Vehicle Information Systems and Networks) , 2007 .

[12]  Florian Dötzer,et al.  Privacy Issues in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks , 2005, Privacy Enhancing Technologies.

[13]  Ronald Czaja,et al.  Designing Surveys: A Guide to Decisions and Procedures , 1995 .

[14]  David Pines,et al.  A study of weigh station technologies and practices. , 2008 .

[15]  Tao Zhang,et al.  Adaptive Privacy-Preserving Authentication in Vehicular Networks , 2006, 2006 First International Conference on Communications and Networking in China.

[16]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Use of Data from Mobile Phone Networks for Transportation Applications , 2010 .

[17]  Piyushimita Thakuriah,et al.  Protecting Location Privacy , 2011 .

[18]  Carlos Carmona,et al.  Travel Time Forecasting and Dynamic Origin-Destination Estimation for Freeways Based on Bluetooth Traffic Monitoring , 2010 .

[19]  S. Ison Local authority and academic attitudes to urban road pricing: a UK perspective , 2000 .

[20]  John D. Fernandez,et al.  SCADA systems: vulnerabilities and remediation , 2005 .

[21]  Asdrubal Garcia-Ortiz,et al.  Traffic incident detection: Sensors and algorithms , 1998 .

[22]  Elizabeth Paton-Simpson Privacy and the Reasonable Paranoid: The Protection of Privacy in Public Places , 2000 .

[23]  Agachai Sumalee,et al.  One Step Forward, Two Steps Back? An Overview of Road Pricing Applications and Research Outside the United States , 2005 .

[24]  C M Walton,et al.  The Implications of Privacy Issues for Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Data , 2000 .

[25]  Hiroyuki Iseki,et al.  Examining the linkages between electronic roadway tolling technologies and road pricing policy objectives , 2012 .

[26]  David J. Forkenbrock,et al.  Implementing a Mileage-Based Road User Charge , 2005 .

[27]  Hui Xiong,et al.  Enhancing Security and Privacy in Traffic-Monitoring Systems , 2006, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[28]  Gordon J. Fielding,et al.  Congestion pricing and the future of transit , 1995 .