Cybercrime risk awareness rate among students in Central Asia: A comparative study in Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan

ABSTRACT It is a well-known fact that the system is as secure as its weakest point. Often, organizations and countries invest in the technologies, forgetting that it is impossible to assure information security without raising awareness among users. Therefore, in this study, the cybercrime awareness rate of users in two Central Asian Countries was investigated. As a target group, students of two public universities from each country were chosen. Results of quantitative research showed that in Kazakhstan, gender and age of respondents affect the cybercrime awareness rate, while in Kyrgyzstan, none of the factors had an impact on this rate. Although there was a statistically significant difference in cybercrime awareness of users in terms of the country of residence, students in two Central Asian countries showed a little difference in information security knowledge, which is, in its own term, mostly depends on the computer literacy rate of students.

[1]  Ali Alper Yayla.  Enforcing information security policies through cultural boundaries: a multinational company approach , 2011, ECIS.

[2]  Nir Kshetri,et al.  Diffusion and Effects of Cyber-Crime in Developing Economies , 2010 .

[3]  Ali Farooq,et al.  Information Security Awareness: Comparing perceptions and training preferences , 2013, 2013 2nd National Conference on Information Assurance (NCIA).

[4]  Fadi A. Aloul.  Information security awareness in UAE: A survey paper , 2010, 2010 International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions.

[5]  N. A. Safarov.  THE COMMONWEALTH OF INDEPENDENT STATES (CIS) , 2006 .

[6]  Rita Ismailova,et al.  Cyber crime risk awareness in Kyrgyz Republic , 2016, Inf. Secur. J. A Glob. Perspect..

[7]  Steven Furnell,et al.  Assessing the security perceptions of personal Internet users , 2007, Comput. Secur..

[8]  E. H. George,et al.  Quantitative versus Qualitative Methods: Understanding Why Quantitative Methods are Predominant in Criminology and Criminal Justice , 2013 .

[9]  Jim Q. Chen,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Comparison of U.S. and Chinese Computer Security Awareness , 2008, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[10]  Yacine Rezgui,et al.  Information security awareness in higher education: An exploratory study , 2008, Comput. Secur..

[11]  B. Lanvin,et al.  The global information technology report 2016 , 2016 .

[12]  Young U. Ryu,et al.  A Cross-cultural Perspective of Information Security Collective Efficacy , 2013, ICIS.

[13]  Igor Bernik,et al.  Cybercrime: Awareness and Fear: Slovenian Perspectives , 2011, 2011 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference.

[14]  F. Aloul.  The Need for Effective Information Security Awareness , 2011 .

[15]  Amit Kumar,et al.  A survey of cyber crime in India , 2013, 2013 15th International Conference on Advanced Computing Technologies (ICACT).

[16]  Himel Mondal,et al.  Using Google Forms for Medical Survey: A Technical Note , 2019 .

[17]  Princely Ifinedo,et al.  Employees' non-malicious, counterproductive computer security behaviors (CCSB) in Nigeria and Canada: An empirical and comparative analysis , 2014, 2014 IEEE 6th International Conference on Adaptive Science & Technology (ICAST).

[18]  Szde Yu.  Fear of Cyber Crime among College Students in the United States: An Exploratory Study , 2014 .

[19]  Elmarie Kritzinger,et al.  Cyber security for home users: A new way of protection through awareness enforcement , 2010, Comput. Secur..

[20]  S. Dutta,et al.  The Global Information Technology Report , 2003 .