Comparison of carbon assimilation estimates over tropical forest types in India based on different satellite and climate data products

Carbon assimilation defined as the overall rate of fixation of carbon through the process of photosynthesis is central to the climate change research. The present study compares the two well-known algorithms in satellite based carbon assimilation estimation, the Vegetation Photosynthesis Model (VPM) and the MOD 17A2 GPP Model, over the tropical forest types in India for a period of two years (September, 2006-August, 2008). The results indicate that the evergreen forest assimilate carbon at a higher rate while the rate is lower for montane grasslands. The comparison between the model results shows that there are large differences between these estimates, and that the spatial resolution of the input datasets plays a larger role than the algorithms of the models. The comparison exercise will be helpful for the refinement and development of the existing and future GPP models by incorporating the empirical environmental conditions. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. (Less)

[1]  R. Welschen,et al.  Midday depression of net photosynthesis in the tropical rainforest tree Eperua grandiflora: contributions of stomatal and internal conductances, respiration and Rubisco functioning. , 2003, Tree physiology.

[2]  Scott J. Goetz,et al.  Mapping net primary production and related biophysical variables with remote sensing: Application to the BOREAS region , 1999 .

[3]  J. Randerson,et al.  Terrestrial ecosystem production: A process model based on global satellite and surface data , 1993 .

[4]  Xiangming Xiao,et al.  Modeling gross primary productivity for winter wheat―maize double cropping system using MODIS time series and CO2 eddy flux tower data , 2009 .

[5]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  Effects of parameter uncertainties on the modeling of terrestrial biosphere dynamics , 2005 .

[6]  Allison L. Dunn,et al.  A satellite‐based biosphere parameterization for net ecosystem CO2 exchange: Vegetation Photosynthesis and Respiration Model (VPRM) , 2008 .

[7]  A. Huete,et al.  The use of vegetation indices in forested regions: issues of linearity and saturation , 1997, IGARSS'97. 1997 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium Proceedings. Remote Sensing - A Scientific Vision for Sustainable Development.

[8]  Ramakrishna R. Nemani,et al.  Evaluation of remote sensing based terrestrial productivity from MODIS using regional tower eddy flux network observations , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[9]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  CO2 balance of boreal, temperate, and tropical forests derived from a global database , 2007 .

[10]  W. Cohen,et al.  Site‐level evaluation of satellite‐based global terrestrial gross primary production and net primary production monitoring , 2005 .

[11]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  Current status and past trends of the global carbon cycle , 2004 .

[12]  T. A. Black,et al.  Can a satellite-derived estimate of the fraction of PAR absorbed by chlorophyll (FAPARchl) improve predictions of light-use efficiency and ecosystem photosynthesis for a boreal aspen forest? , 2009 .

[13]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Methods in Ecosystem Science , 2000, Springer New York.

[14]  H. Tian,et al.  Effect of interannual climate variability on carbon storage in Amazonian ecosystems , 1998, Nature.

[15]  S. Running,et al.  Global products of vegetation leaf area and fraction absorbed PAR from year one of MODIS data , 2002 .

[16]  Ryosuke Shibasaki,et al.  Evaluating agricultural and nonagricultural carbon fixation over India using remote sensing data , 2003, SPIE Remote Sensing.

[17]  A. Huete,et al.  Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices , 2002 .

[18]  V. K. Dadhwal,et al.  Assessment of Major Pools and Fluxes of Carbon in Indian Forests , 2004 .

[19]  D. Kuang,et al.  Comparison of multiple models for estimating gross primary production using MODIS and eddy covariance data in Harvard Forest , 2010 .

[20]  George Alan Blackburn,et al.  Monitoring conservation effectiveness in a global biodiversity hotspot: the contribution of land cover change assessment , 2009, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[21]  T. Toma,et al.  Limitation of leaf carbon gain by stomatal and photochemical processes in the top canopy of Macaranga conifera, a tropical pioneer tree. , 1999, Tree physiology.

[22]  Lars Eklundh,et al.  Net primary production and light use efficiency in a mixed coniferous forest in Sweden , 2005 .

[23]  C. K. Baru,et al.  Environmental Monitoring Network for India , 2007, Science.

[24]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  A Continuous Satellite-Derived Measure of Global Terrestrial Primary Production , 2004 .

[25]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Modeling and measuring the effects of disturbance history and climate on carbon and water budgets in evergreen needleleaf forests , 2002 .

[26]  V. K. Srivastava,et al.  Spatial interpolation of carbon stock: a case study from the Western Ghats biodiversity hotspot, India , 2010 .

[27]  C. Tucker,et al.  Climate-Driven Increases in Global Terrestrial Net Primary Production from 1982 to 1999 , 2003, Science.

[28]  D. Lobell,et al.  View angle effects on canopy reflectance and spectral mixture analysis of coniferous forests using AVIRIS , 2002 .

[29]  E. Rastetter,et al.  Potential Net Primary Productivity in South America: Application of a Global Model. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[30]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Modeling gross primary production of temperate deciduous broadleaf forest using satellite images and climate data , 2004 .

[31]  S. Running,et al.  Global Terrestrial Gross and Net Primary Productivity from the Earth Observing System , 2000 .

[32]  E. Linacre,et al.  Climate Data and Resources: A Reference and Guide , 2003 .

[33]  Jiyuan Liu,et al.  Characterization of forest types in Northeastern China, using multi-temporal SPOT-4 VEGETATION sensor data , 2002 .

[34]  Cristina Milesi,et al.  User's Guide GPP and NPP (MOD17A2/A3) Products NASA MODIS Land Algorithm , 2003 .

[35]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  The global carbon cycle: integrating humans, climate and the natural world. , 2004 .

[36]  T. Vesala,et al.  Deriving a light use efficiency model from eddy covariance flux data for predicting daily gross primary production across biomes , 2007 .

[37]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Parameterization and Sensitivity Analysis of the BIOME–BGC Terrestrial Ecosystem Model: Net Primary Production Controls , 2000 .

[38]  E. Davidson,et al.  Satellite-based modeling of gross primary production in an evergreen needleleaf forest , 2004 .

[39]  G. Bonan.  Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate Benefits of Forests , 2008, Science.

[40]  Phaedon C. Kyriakidis,et al.  A geostatistical approach for mapping thematic classification accuracy and evaluating the impact of inaccurate spatial data on ecological model predictions , 2001, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[41]  Xiangming Xiao,et al.  Modeling gross primary production of alpine ecosystems in the Tibetan Plateau using MODIS images and climate data , 2007 .

[42]  S. Goward,et al.  Global Primary Production: A Remote Sensing Approach , 1995 .

[43]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  Sensitivity of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) terrestrial primary production to the accuracy of meteorological reanalyses , 2006 .

[44]  S. Frolking,et al.  Satellite-based modeling of gross primary production in a seasonally moist tropical evergreen forest , 2005 .

[45]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  CO2 fluxes over plant canopies and solar radiation: a review , 1995 .

[46]  V K Dadhwal,et al.  Estimation and analysis of terrestrial net primary productivity over India by remote-sensing-driven terrestrial biosphere model , 2010, Environmental monitoring and assessment.