Controlling speed and direction during interception: an affordance-based approach

The coordination of direction and speed of self-motion when intercepting a target moving parallel to the ground plane was examined. Subjects viewed a computer-generated environment comprised of a textured ground plane and a moving target. Turning rate was controlled using a steering wheel and speed was controlled using a foot pedal. It was hypothesized that these two degrees of freedom would be coordinated such that the speed required to intercept the target (i.e., the ideal speed) would be maintained below the subject’s maximum possible speed. As predicted, subjects turned toward the target when ideal speed was less than maximum speed and ahead of the target when ideal speed was greater than maximum speed. When behavior was compared across groups with different maximum speed capabilities, it was found that the ratio of ideal to maximum speed was invariant across groups at critical points of both steering and speed adjustments. Finally, subjects rapidly recalibrated to a sudden increase or decrease in maximum speed. The results suggest that actors coordinate steering and speed during interception in a way that takes into account the limits on their action capabilities. Discussion focuses on the role of calibration and the implications of the present findings for existing models of visually guided interception.

[1]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Hitting moving targets: Co-operative control of 'when' and 'where' , 1996 .

[2]  M. Landy,et al.  Optimal Compensation for Changes in Task-Relevant Movement Variability , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  D. Regan,et al.  Monocular discrimination of the direction of motion in depth , 1994, Vision Research.

[4]  Reinoud J. Bootsma,et al.  Predictive information and the control of action: What you see is what you get. , 1991 .

[5]  Brett R. Fajen.  The scaling of information to action in visually guided braking. , 2005 .

[6]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Visuo-motor coordination and internal models for object interception , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  J. Tresilian,et al.  a moving target: effects of temporal precision constraints and movement amplitude , 2022 .

[9]  W. H. Warren,et al.  Behavioral dynamics of intercepting a moving target , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Seville Chapman.  Catching a Baseball , 1968 .

[11]  E. Todorov.  Optimality principles in sensorimotor control , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  P. Fitts,et al.  INFORMATION CAPACITY OF DISCRETE MOTOR RESPONSES. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  Robert A Jacobs,et al.  Near-Optimal Human Adaptive Control across Different Noise Environments , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  Rik Warren.  Optical Transformation during Movement: Review of the Optical Concomitants of Egomotion , 1982 .

[15]  J. Tresilian,et al.  Manual interception of moving targets in two dimensions: Performance and space-time accuracy , 2009, Brain Research.

[16]  J. Wann,et al.  Steering with or without the flow: is the retrieval of heading necessary? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  E. Reed.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[18]  Claire F. Michaels,et al.  The optics and actions of catching fly balls , 1992 .

[19]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[20]  Geert J P Savelsbergh,et al.  Rate of Change of Angular Bearing as the Relevant Property in a Horizontal Interception Task During Locomotion , 2002, Journal of motor behavior.

[21]  F. C. Bakker,et al.  Catching balls: how to get the hand to the right place at the right time. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  H. Hecht,et al.  Time-to-contact , 2004 .

[23]  P. McLeod,et al.  The generalized optic acceleration cancellation theory of catching. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Brett R. Fajen,et al.  Rapid recalibration based on optic flow in visually guided action , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  Brett R Fajen,et al.  Calibration, information, and control strategies for braking to avoid a collision. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  J. Tresilian.  Study of a Servo-control Strategy for Projectile Interception , 1995 .

[27]  P. McLeod,et al.  Do Fielders Know Where to Go to Catch the Ball or Only How to Get There , 1996 .

[28]  J. Tresilian,et al.  Systematic Variation in Performance of an Interceptive Action with Changes in the Temporal Constraints , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[29]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  Toward a new theory of motor synergies. , 2007, Motor control.

[30]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Independent control of acceleration and direction of the hand when hitting moving targets. , 2002, Spatial vision.

[31]  Emanuel Todorov,et al.  Evidence for the Flexible Sensorimotor Strategies Predicted by Optimal Feedback Control , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  J. Bastin,et al.  Prospective strategies underlie the control of interceptive actions. , 2006, Human movement science.

[33]  J M Flach,et al.  Sources of optical information useful for perception of speed of rectilinear self-motion. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  Gilles Montagne,et al.  Chapter 20 How time-to-contact is involved in the regulation of goal-directed locomotion , 2004 .

[35]  E Brenner,et al.  Perception and action are based on the same visual information: distinction between position and velocity. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[37]  A. Chardenon,et al.  The perceptual control of goal-directed locomotion: a common control architecture for interception and navigation? , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  J. Tresilian,et al.  Constraints on the spatiotemporal accuracy of interceptive action: effects of target size on hitting a moving target , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  Anne-Marie Brouwer,et al.  Hitting moving targets: effects of target speed and dimensions on movement time , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  Brett R Fajen,et al.  Visual Guidance of Intercepting a Moving Target on Foot , 2004, Perception.

[41]  David M Jacobs,et al.  Lateral interception I: operative optical variables, attunement, and calibration. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  Brett R. Fajen,et al.  Affordance-Based Control of Visually Guided Action , 2007 .

[43]  A. Chardenona,et al.  The visual control of ball interception during human locomotion , 2002 .

[44]  R J Bootsma,et al.  Visual information about time-to-collision between two objects. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  Marion A. Eppler,et al.  Development of Visually Guided Locomotion , 1998 .

[46]  W H Warren,et al.  Visual control of braking: a test of the tau hypothesis. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  Brett R Fajen,et al.  Perceiving Possibilities for Action: On the Necessity of Calibration and Perceptual Learning for the Visual Guidance of Action , 2005, Perception.

[48]  William H. Warren,et al.  Visually Controlled Locomotion: 40 years Later , 1998 .