The rapid disintegration of projections: The West Antarctic Ice Sheet and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

How and why did the scientific consensus about sea level rise due to the disintegration of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS), expressed in the third Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessment, disintegrate on the road to the fourth? Using ethnographic interviews and analysis of IPCC documents, we trace the abrupt disintegration of the WAIS consensus. First, we provide a brief historical overview of scientific assessments of the WAIS. Second, we provide a detailed case study of the decision not to provide a WAIS prediction in the Fourth Assessment Report. Third, we discuss the implications of this outcome for the general issue of scientists and policymakers working in assessment organizations to make projections. IPCC authors were less certain about potential WAIS futures than in previous assessment reports in part because of new information, but also because of the outcome of cultural processes within the IPCC, including how people were selected for and worked together within their writing groups. It became too difficult for IPCC assessors to project the range of possible futures for WAIS due to shifts in scientific knowledge as well as in the institutions that facilitated the interpretations of this knowledge.

[1]  D. Sarewitz.  The voice of science: let's agree to disagree , 2011, Nature.

[2]  B. Metz.  The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2011 .

[3]  H. McSween.  IS SCIENCE A CONTACT SPORT , 2011 .

[4]  Mike Hulme,et al.  Climate change: What do we know about the IPCC? , 2010 .

[5]  P. N. Edwards.  A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming , 2010 .

[6]  S. Rahmstorf,et al.  Global sea level linked to global temperature , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  I. Velicogna.  Increasing rates of ice mass loss from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets revealed by GRACE , 2009 .

[8]  Martijn Gough.  Climate change , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[9]  Duncan J. Wingham,et al.  Spatial and temporal evolution of Pine Island Glacier thinning, 1995–2006 , 2009 .

[10]  W. Parker.  II—Wendy S. Parker: Confirmation and adequacy-for-Purpose in Climate Modelling , 2009 .

[11]  J. Bamber,et al.  Reassessment of the Potential Sea-Level Rise from a Collapse of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet , 2009, Science.

[12]  Duncan J. Wingham,et al.  Spatial and temporal evolution of Pine Island Glacier thinning , 2009 .

[13]  W. T. Pfeffer,et al.  Kinematic Constraints on Glacier Contributions to 21st-Century Sea-Level Rise , 2008, Science.

[14]  David G. Vaughan,et al.  West Antarctic Ice Sheet collapse – the fall and rise of a paradigm , 2008 .

[15]  Eric Rignot,et al.  Recent Antarctic ice mass loss from radar interferometry and regional climate modelling , 2008 .

[16]  Paul Fields.  The Future of Everything: The Science of Prediction , 2008 .

[17]  Brian C. O'Neill,et al.  The Limits of Consensus , 2007, Science.

[18]  Helen Amanda Fricker,et al.  An Active Subglacial Water System in West Antarctica Mapped from Space , 2007, Science.

[19]  Anthony Patt,et al.  Assessing model-based and conflict-based uncertainty , 2007 .

[20]  S. Rahmstorf.  A Semi-Empirical Approach to Projecting Future Sea-Level Rise , 2007, Science.

[21]  D. Randall,et al.  Climate models and their evaluation , 2007 .

[22]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Global climate projections , 2007 .

[23]  Shardul Agrawala,et al.  Climate change. The limits of consensus. , 2007, Science.

[24]  Bert Bolin,et al.  A History of the Science and Politics of Climate Change: The Role of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[25]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Mitigation from a cross-sectoral perspective , 2007 .

[26]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[27]  Jill Jäger,et al.  Assessments of regional and global environmental risks : designing processes for the effective use of science in decisionmaking , 2006 .

[28]  Annelise Riles,et al.  Documents : artifacts of modern knowledge , 2006 .

[29]  Arthur C. Petersen,et al.  SIMULATION UNCERTAINTY AND THE CHALLENGE OF POSTNORMAL SCIENCE , 2006 .

[30]  Myanna Lahsen,et al.  Seductive Simulations? Uncertainty Distribution Around Climate Models , 2005 .

[31]  S. Jasanoff.  Designs on Nature , 2005 .

[32]  J. H. Mercer.  ANTARCTIC ICE AND SANGAMON SEA LEVEL , 2005 .

[33]  D. Mosse,et al.  Is Good Policy Unimplementable? Reflections on the Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice , 2004 .

[34]  J. Firor.  Tora Skodvin, Structure and Agency in the Scientific Diplomacy of Climate Change , 2002 .

[35]  R. Mitchell.  Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks, Volume 2: A Comparative History of Social Responses to Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and Acid Rain , 2002 .

[36]  V. Dale,et al.  Science and Decisionmaking , 2002 .

[37]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 2001 : the scientific basis , 2001 .

[38]  Clark A. Miller.  Hybrid Management: Boundary Organizations, Science Policy, and Environmental Governance in the Climate Regime , 2001 .

[39]  D. Guston.  Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction , 2001 .

[40]  David G. Vaughan,et al.  BEDMAP: a new ice thickness and subglacial topographic model of Antarctica , 2001 .

[41]  Au.  Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks: A Comparative History of Social Responses to Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and Acid Rain , 2001 .

[42]  Horritt,et al.  Model Validation: Perspectives in Hydrological Science , 2001 .

[43]  Self-Governance and Peer Review in Science-for-Policy: The Case of the IPCC Second Assessment Report , 2001 .

[44]  Tora Skodvin,et al.  Structure and agent in the scientific diplomacy of climate change : an empirical case study of science-policy interaction in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2000 .

[45]  R. Pielke,et al.  Prediction : science, decision making, and the future of nature , 2000 .

[46]  Anthony Patt,et al.  Assessing extreme outcomes: the strategic treatment of low probability impacts in scientific assessment , 1999 .

[47]  N. Oreskes.  The Rejection of Continental Drift: Theory and Method in American Earth Science , 1999 .

[48]  P. N. Edwards.  GLOBAL CLIMATE SCIENCE, UNCERTAINTY AND POLITICS: DATA-LADEN MODELS, MODEL-FILTERED DATA , 1999 .

[49]  Elizabeth L. Malone,et al.  Human choice and climate change. Volume 1: The societal framework , 1998 .

[50]  D. Dennis,et al.  Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed , 1998 .

[51]  R. Bindschadler,et al.  Changes in the west antarctic ice sheet since 1963 from declassified satellite photography , 1998, Science.

[52]  James C. Scott,et al.  Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed , 1999 .

[53]  The intergovernmental panal on climate change: consensual knowledge and global politics , 1997 .

[54]  S. Shackley,et al.  Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority , 1996 .

[55]  N Oreskes,et al.  Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences , 1994, Science.

[56]  Rachelle D. Hollander,et al.  Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management , 1994 .

[57]  R. Alley,et al.  Changes in the West Antarctic Ice Sheet , 1991, Science.

[58]  S. Jasanoff,et al.  The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. , 1991 .

[59]  Scott D. Sagan,et al.  Inventing Accuracy: A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance, Donald MacKenzie, 1990. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 500 pages. ISBN: 0-262-13258-3. $29.95 , 1990 .

[60]  Douglas R. Macayeal,et al.  Large‐scale ice flow over a viscous basal sediment: Theory and application to ice stream B, Antarctica , 1989 .

[61]  P. Abrams.  Notes on the Difficulty of Studying the State (1977) , 1988 .

[62]  C. Veen.  Response of a marine ice sheet to changes at the grounding line , 1985 .

[63]  J. Titus,et al.  Projecting future sea level rise : methodology, estimates to the year 2100, and research needs , 1983 .

[64]  M. Foucault,et al.  Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison , 2020, On Violence.

[65]  C. Bentley,et al.  A Model for Holocene Retreat of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet , 1978, Quaternary Research.

[66]  R. D'amico.  Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison , 1978, Telos.

[67]  M. Foucault,et al.  Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. , 1978 .

[68]  J. H. Mercer.  West Antarctic ice sheet and CO2 greenhouse effect: a threat of disaster , 1978, Nature.

[69]  T. Hughes.  West Antarctic Ice Streams , 1977 .

[70]  J. Weertman,et al.  Stability of the Junction of an Ice Sheet and an Ice Shelf , 1974, Journal of Glaciology.

[71]  T. Hughes,et al.  Is the west Antarctic Ice Sheet disintegrating , 1973 .